View Single Post
Old 05-01-2008, 07:07 PM   #2
SebC
tromboner
 
SebC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: where the lattes are
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WesternCanadaKing View Post
http://www.canada.com/calgaryherald/...8-b9570a056416

So the government pumped $25 million into an Alberta marketing scheme so people will think the oilsands are environmentally friendly? Why not make them environmentally friendly first?
I'm not a fan our government by any means, but there are some things I think you should know before you criticize this.

First off, Alberta's oil is simply more carbon intensive than conventional oil. It simply takes more energy to extract oil sands than it does to drill a hole into a high-pressure reservoir. There's a thermodynamical limit to the efficiency with which we can process the oil sands, so there's no way to make them less carbon-intensive than conventional oil. Yes we can go further to clean up the oil sands but unless those changes are economically feasible and profitable than they aren't really possible at all. That's the nature of a capitalist society.

Given that the US law proposes that the government not purchase oil that is more carbon intensive than conventional, what the Alberta government is doing is lobbying to have our oil classified as conventional. And really, if we want to keep selling oil to the US government, well, that's really the only thing we can do, for the reasons outlined above.
SebC is offline   Reply With Quote