Quote:
Originally Posted by Locke
No kidding. I agree with you there and I'm aware of the general leveraged situations of most large companies, but the fact remains that the League is trying to mandate less held debt per team.
There has to be a reason.
This seems weird, or perhaps out of date? I know the Redskins are incredibly valuable, but some of those franchise values seem really low and others are higher than I'd imagine.
As for whether or not those values are equivalent to "price tags" on franchises, I'm not sure.
There are a lot of factors to consider when calculating "value" versus "price" or "cost." One of the major differences including possibility of future cashflows and revenues.
If they are right then Katz up in the Chuck got fleeced! |
I think this article was older....and it may be what their assets are worth too, not what the overall company is worth. The rankings are likely legitimate, but I'm with you on the "price tags".