Quote:
Originally posted by Agamemnon+Mar 14 2005, 10:22 AM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Agamemnon @ Mar 14 2005, 10:22 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-moon@Mar 14 2005, 04:21 PM
I am not saying it should be nominated for an academy award by any stretch of the imagination, but it was more entertaining than both Ray and Million dollar baby and isn't that really what a movie should be??
|
I guess that's what you think a movie should be. Hotel Rwanda wasn't 'entertaining', but it was an amazing, fantastic movie. I think the Academy looks a lot more at content, story, and script than special effects and eye-candy, which is what Constantine was. [/b][/quote]
Hotel Rwanda is a movie I really want to see and assume that it would be entertaining. Not fo rhte same reasons that Constatine was.
The reason I found Ray and Miillion dollar baby not entertaining was because I thought the stories were boring for the most part. Not because they didn't blow enough stuff up.
All I am saying is people too often dismiss movies such as Constantine as being crap because they have ridiculous story lines but often these movies are better than movies that are supposed to have such great stories, dialougue etc.