The fact they're equating order with thermodynamics tells me it isn't science.
In your copy/pasted post, there's ONE reference, on the first paragraph. And that reference is to a letter, not a peer reviewed scientific work. And that reference says nothing about order or disorder or anything of the next claims made.
They do not arrive at their answers the same way, look at AiG, DI and the others, they clearly state that their ultimate source of truth is scripture and that their goal is to find science that complies with that scripture, and if it doesn't it must be wrong. That kind of thinking precludes any kind of science.
It's not real science. What's the hypothesis? What tests have been made? What predictions have been confirmed? Name some? Name one!
It's not science, it's simply people sitting back trying to poke holes in things. If it was real science they'd publish their findings.
__________________
Uncertainty is an uncomfortable position.
But certainty is an absurd one.
|