Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community - View Single Post

4X4 · 03-19-2008, 10:52 PM

I think he means that if they did own the stadiums (and therefore the debt) they would have assets (the stadiums) to put up as collateral for the debt.

But yeah, this article sounds like positioning from the league. They're priming. Reminiscent of Bettman's "we need cost certainty" and Goodenow's "we will never accept a salary cap".

03-19-2008, 10:52 PM	#11
4X4 One of the Nine Join Date: Dec 2004 Exp:	I think he means that if they did own the stadiums (and therefore the debt) they would have assets (the stadiums) to put up as collateral for the debt. But yeah, this article sounds like positioning from the league. They're priming. Reminiscent of Bettman's "we need cost certainty" and Goodenow's "we will never accept a salary cap".