NASA admits global warming (for your lefties) or climate change (for your righties) is indeed happening and that it is a result of human industrial activity and acknowledges that something must be done. NATO identifies global warming or climate change as the second greatest security threat to the defense alliance in the next decade. Those are two pretty substantial bodies, with completely different agendas, idenitifying the issue as being a massive threat to our existance and way of life. Isn't that enough?
I'll say this again, because it seems to get lost on people. There is concensus amongst the scientific community that global warming is happening, and that it is a result of human activity. Concensus does not mean unanimity, but does mean that the vast majority of those involved have agreed upon a cause. That cause is CO2 theory. Scientists from all different fields, with different specialities, have compiled their studies and come up with a unified theory. It is this unified theory where there is concensus. Yes, there are other theories out there, but there is no concensus amongst those who promote those other theories. They only concensus amongst those scientists is their belief that CO2 theory is incorrect. They fail to agree on a unified theory to explain what is causing the changes in our planet, which gives them no serious weight to challenge the concensus unified theory. The only reason that they get the press that they do is because of the powerful entities that exist that desire to cloud the issue and maintain status quo, for massive profits and increasing control and power. Until a unified thery can be presented to counter the CO2 theory, the other commentary is noise. Dismissing the theory does nothing if there is no other unified theory to explain the changes.
|