I just started reading this thread tonight and after seeing the back and forth between the two of you, I've reached these conclusions.
A) Reggie doesn't like Jane and the party she's associated with. However, there seems to be a lot of anger and bitterness rather than a disagreement with Jane's views
B) Jane seems to keep apologizing/explaining her responses to Reggie as if he is actually her opponent in the riding. Why waste your time debating someone who just gets off on attacking you regardless of your apologies or explanations.
C) You two keep continuing this endless procession for days which indicates some sort of psychological attachment you two have.
D) As much as people might like the fiscal ideas of WIldrose Alliance. There social views are outdated. Paul Hinman lost all the momentum in the debate when it came to child care and he suggested that Albertans should be focused on family friendly policies. I.E. Man work, woman cook and feed children. Your party actually assumes that the majority of people want to go back into time when there was this supposed "golden era" of humanity. It's a myth and most people actually enjoy the way things or otherwise your party would garner more than the rural vote and the " I hate change" vote.
E) One last thing, I haven't heard of either you or the PC candidate prior to today. Nor should it matter, you vote for a party's platform and policies, not someone's picture on a lawn sign and brochure. Only fools vote for an individual MP. As if that one person is gonna vote against party lines or get the leader to change his government plans. Good grief.
My prediction for your party Jane, WA gets to keep its one seat...maybe.
|