Quote:
Originally Posted by HotHotHeat
This isn't that complicated. Your belief appears to be that if it's not in plain view, it can't be true. Mine is that there's more to dealings like this than we hear about in main stream media. The facts are there to interpret how you may.
It's obvious what I was implying...But you don't seem to be able to read between to lines.
|
Nice change of tune, now we finally get to the heart of the issue.
Thanks for finally admitting that you think there is something underhanded about this deal, I'm not sure why it took so darn long, especially for someone who apparently doesn't care what people think of him.
So why exactly do you think that there is something going on here that isn't above board?
Is it becasue there is a Canadian company involved?
Is it becasue rebuilding a crippled air transit system is a real priority for an industrialized but weakened nation?
Is it because Boeing is the natural choice due to size, and familiarity with their aircraft?
I'll concede that Boeing was probaly given special consideration because they are based in the country that had the most to do with ousting Sadam vs, a country that was opposed to it, but even that seems pretty reasonable.
Your assumption about what I belive is a little presumptuous, and a whole lot wrong.
Is my conclusion that this deal is legitimate and appropriate really an ignorant denial that something sinister is going on, or is it a logical conclusion based on the facts?
You claim I dismiss anything that isn't in plain view? Well maybe we're both looking into the same dark closet, and where you see monsters, I just see some shirts on hangers.