Quote:
Originally Posted by Lanny_MacDonald
The Institute for Creation Research. You don't see the contradiction in that name? I guess not.
|
Don't institutes usually research? Perhaps there's an institute for research on the big bang? I'm sure if there isn't a whole institute on it, there's a lot of scientists who research it anyway...
Quote:
|
Before calling someone a hypocrite, maybe have a better grip on the subject matter, especially what constitutes science. Also better get a grip on your terminology and recognise that "creation" has several different meanings, but a scientist and a theologian would not use the same terms to define "creation" and they likely wouldn't use them in the same context to describe the birth of the universe.
|
My grim is firm, Lanny. In any science, you have a theory, and you try to comfirm or contradict it, and then work from those conclusions. There is more to creation theory than just "and then we're here." There are other ways creation could have happened and only the close minded would fail to see that. The Big Bang is only one of the other theories, and scientists work hard to either confirm or deny plausibility, cause that's just what it is... And if they find something new, they input that data and keep going. You can redefine science so why can't you redefine religion?