Quote:
Originally Posted by Calgaryborn
Yes well I don't think much of you either.
Untrue. You applaud and support the Supreme Court deciding for every American what the Constitution would say regarding when a life begins.
I said it was wrong for the Supreme Court to go beyond the Constitution. I also said it was rightfully the job of the law makers to define when a human life begins. That is what your Constitution says. It's not the job of the courts to make law.
Yes and this was done by law makers. The Supreme Court didn't decide that a black man was a human being. They would rightly interpret the intent of both the law and the amendment to include black men if someone tried to exclude them.
Again it's you who are suggesting a constitutional amendment for gays. I'm suggesting that until the constitution says when life begins it is a matter for the law-makers to define it; Not some activist judges.
It's hypocritical of you to say you embrace the constitution and yet applaud when the Supreme Court supersedes there mandate. I guess your commitment to abortion trumps your commitment to the constitution.
|
Shouldn't you be reading the intelligent design textbook. That young earth theory is absolutely brilliant. I have this strange feeling that if you had it your way Calgaryborn, the bible would be our constitution. Don't hide your true feelings. Jesus needs you to speak freely, so you can put us his heathens in to our proper place.