Quote:
Originally Posted by photon
See, once again you simply make something up and then attack that. How is someone expected to have a rational discussion against that?
|
I've given you plenty to argue about, you snipped it out of your reply and wrote 'stuff'. In fact the only bit of true rational argument I've seen to this point is that 'evidence doesn't lie'. As LM said, that's a two way street as well. You're throwing your support behind a computer model recapture of the event, mine is behind the political motivation that exists.
Quote:
|
See, same thing again. Who said you are crazy? Who said things only in the limits of the norm can be discussed? Which authority is handing out consequences as a result of being challenged?
|
Maybe not you to the same extent, but the sarcasm this thread has been met with makes it pretty clear.
Quote:
|
Again with the black and white that you accused others of; the only two positions aren't agree with you or be part of the authority that's "persecuting" you...
|
Expand on this...I do agree...But what do position do you subscribe to?