View Single Post
Old 02-02-2008, 02:15 PM   #94
CaramonLS
Retired
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Azure View Post

Nobody would have cried foul play had the US simply found chemical or biological agents in Iraq.

And I doubt the US, with all their resources would have had any problem planting that evidence, had Bush really 'lied.'

I mean, if I was going to war knowing that most of my intelligence was cooked, the least I would have done is cover my bases.
Not true.

WMDs have always been the secondary reason for the invasion, with the first being the "Iraq/Al Queda connection"/"Iraq/911", which has never been proven.
CaramonLS is offline   Reply With Quote