Quote:
Originally Posted by Azure
How did they lie?
Every report that Bush and his administration used to orchestrate the war was available to everyone in Congress. Even if Dean wants to say that the intelligence they received was 'corrupt'....nothing was mentioned in the Senate Report in the intelligence gathered on Iraq leading up the war.
Also, Bush and his 'cronies' do not generate intelligence. And like I said earlier, there was almost 100% support from the US intelligence community in regards to the intelligence they found. IIRC, the only thing some had a problem with was the 'nuclear'....side to the whole equation.
So until you provide evidence to prove that Bush lied....you're wrong.
You'll probably be hard-pressed to find it to...considering that nothing in the Senate report mentioned anything about 'lying'.
Nor does it mention anything about falsely generated evidence.
|
There have been numerous books published and interviews given by insiders saying the evidence was at best "hand picked" to fit the agenda. You follow this stuff closely enough to know this is true.
There was not and is not "almost 100% support" from the intelligence folks and there never was. It's quite well known that this "Curveball" character was a loon and a liar from the get-go, and that's only one example.