Quote:
Originally posted by Daradon+Feb 25 2005, 11:57 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Daradon @ Feb 25 2005, 11:57 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-Mean Mr. Mustard@Feb 25 2005, 05:54 PM
"She asserts that when plaintiff 'delivered' his sperm, it was a gift — an absolute and irrevocable transfer of title to property from a donor to a donee," the decision said. "There was no agreement that the original deposit would be returned upon request."
|
Oh, I laughed out loud on that one. Makes a twisted sort of sense too.
Maybe he should argue there were stipulations on the gift? Implied uses? They probably have a better lawyer term.
BUt man o man, I'd be suing for SOMETHING, if not emotional distress. [/b][/quote]
You could probably sue for custody...
