Quote:
Originally posted by Agamemnon+Feb 22 2005, 10:00 AM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Agamemnon @ Feb 22 2005, 10:00 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>
Quote:
Originally posted by 4X4@Feb 22 2005, 08:21 AM
<!--QuoteBegin-I-Hate-Hulse
|
Quote:
@Feb 21 2005, 11:09 PM
What's clear is that O'Malley doesn't give a damn about the kids, but instead sees his trusteeship to advance his own personal agenda.# The Board is spending a lot of it's time that could otherwise have been spent on other issues, and now legal fees to deal with this zealot.
|
The funny thing is that this is part of what he's calling out the board for. He is going on the evening news spinning his side of the story out to make it seem as though he is asking for something that should be a right, and accusing the board of wasting time by arguing with him. I'm not as familiar with the story, but I remember him whining recently that the board was resisting his motion.
Essentially, he was angry that the board did not just do as he asked.
Michael Moore tactics. Goofs like these tarnish thier cause.
|
Sorry, I must be tired. What connection do Michael Moore and Michael O'Malley have aside from same first name?
What are 'Michael Moore' tactics, and how is O'Malley using them? [/b][/quote]
I classify Michael Moore tactics as running around spouting off to microphones alleging things that you have no proof of. Spinning things to make it appear exactly how you want it to, regardless of reality.