View Single Post
Old 12-14-2007, 11:03 AM   #46
Cowboy89
Franchise Player
 
Cowboy89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wookie View Post
Yup
It's also subjective to how one views themselves.

I remember awhile ago someone suggested I try online dating. Went online, three features I checked for my search was
Fit
Muscular
Thin

OMG - the amount of girls who had checked off "fit" hahaha. It was ridiculous. Made my search redundant. I wondered what I would have returned had I checked normal, or average.

But, that's coming from someone who thinks "fit" means you are on par or close to my level of fitness. Which - almost borders on obsessive.

Take one of my buddies who used to be an athlete, he's probably 20lbs overweight by my standards, considers himself an x-athlete, in shape, but not an athlete anymore. My average person, or what the majority of people that checked themselves as fit, would have been his version of fit.
Totally agree. Those who call themsevles 'Muscular' are really butch girls in every sense of the word. They're probably stronger than the average girl, played rugby or field hockey in University/High School and that seems to give them permission in their own minds to call themselves 'Muscular.' Whereas I'm sure you were looking for an average size build girl, who's toned to the point of arms starting to resemble guns (But not in the manly sense) with a flat and cut stomach, runners legs, etc, as opposed to a girl with a build resembling an offensive tackle. That's why self-evaluation without pictures describing what it meant by 'muscular', 'thin', and 'fit' is useless.
Cowboy89 is offline   Reply With Quote