View Single Post
Old 12-12-2007, 05:52 PM   #114
Dan02
Franchise Player
 
Dan02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Question

Quote:
Originally Posted by Muta View Post
Is that so?

Directly from StatsCan:

---------------------DENSITY----------LAND AREA (SQ.KM)---------RATIO
Calgary (City): -----1,360.2/kmē --------------726.5 ---------------1.87
Vancouver(City): ---5,039.0/kmē -------------114.71 ---------------44.0

Calgary's urban sprawl is assumedly MUCH, MUCH bigger. Each Calgarian has approximately 24x as much space as a Vancouverite does, given City boundaries and population.
This is some very bad math.

Quote:
Originally Posted by MaxPower View Post
I'm confused. What does the "ratio" mean? Are the units of the ratio not 1/(km^4).... what is that?

If I want space per person, can I not invert the density to get:

CAL: 1/1360.2 = 0.000735 km^2/person
VAN: 1/5039 = 0.000198 km^2/person

The ratio between these two is 3.70. I would interpret that as each Calgarian having 3.7046 times the space of a Vancouverite, not 24x.
He has the right answer. your answer is the space multiplied by the city size again which is why your answer is 726.5/114.7 larger then his is. You're double multiplying by city size.
Dan02 is offline   Reply With Quote