Quote:
Originally Posted by Ransacko
I don't know what's more amusing, you using Wikipedia to attempt to solidify your stance or the fact that you claim to be of the legal school of thought. First off, Little does not equate to none. Secondly the very idea you attempt to draw a tenuous link between the legal system and the weight of anthropological evidence is incredibly humorous. Give yourself a pat on the back, you've earned the angst-filled, angry immature pseudo-intellectual achievement.
Go continue spouting your wiki-borne knowledge to the masses, and if you truly belong to the law profession in Canada, go take a look at General Tire Canada INC. v. Aylwards LTD. Don't forget since you are a professional your "opinion" does in fact equate to advice. Rational individuals would do better for themselves than to resort to spouting idealogical crap from the mouth of the internet's forum of idiots.
Back up your claims with some relevant legal posturing rather than utilizing oft used argument of how what you claim to be "Hearsay" as entirely unimportant.
But I will congratulate you on one thing, you have made me laugh at how stupid internet "experts" can claim to be. You sir typify the very reason why democracy is so riddled with flaws.
Congrats!
|
Oh come on, it really doesn't matter.