View Single Post
Old 11-22-2007, 11:37 AM   #274
MarchHare
Franchise Player
 
MarchHare's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: YSJ (1979-2002) -> YYC (2002-2022) -> YVR (2022-present)
Exp:
Default

Quote:
I personally don't see that big of a deal with ID being taught at the same time as evolution.
The problem is that creationism/ID is inherently non-scientific. It absolutely should not be taught in a science classroom.

Quote:
But if you force anything that has religious backing out of the schools, then you inevitably end up removing a lot of literature from schools at the same time. Remember that so much of classical and even contemporary literature has it's roots in Christianity.
I don't disagree. I have no problems with the various creation myths of the world's different religions as well as other myths being taught in the proper context, such as a history or social studies class. Where I take issue is when super-natural beliefs are taught alongside scientific theories, as if each should be given equal weight when explaining the natural world. Or when religious activists try to dismiss evolution as "just a theory" (as the Dover school board tried to do by forcing science teachers to read a 1-minute "disclaimer" prior to teaching evolution in their classrooms) on par with creationism, implying that a field of study that has withstood the demands of the scientific method and peer review for over 150 years is non-credible.
MarchHare is offline   Reply With Quote