[Azure]

Originally Posted by MarchHare

Which, of course, is silly. You can't "disprove" the existence of the Flying Spaghetti Monster or the Invisible Pink Unicorn either, but nobody would seriously suggest that anyone should treat them as deities that actually exist. Once again, stating that religious beliefs are valid because God cannot be disproved is a fallacious argument.

Silly to you.

A belief in God is not supposed to be centered around physical truths.

Also, I never said a religious belief is 'valid' because God cannot be disproven. I said people will have a hard time changing their viewpoint because of the fact that God cannot be disproven.

You've never heard of St. Thomas Aquinas's "proofs" for the existence of God? Are you not familiar with the ontological argument for the existence of God?

And?

Whats your point?

Those are just two examples among many more. For centuries philosophers and theologians have been attempting to demonstrate God's existence through arguments that go beyond just faith. Clearly you are ignorant on this subject; here is a good starting point to better educate yourself on this.

Love the ignorance comment.

You have shown me nothing that a belief in God is centered around anything else besides faith. There is no 'physical' proof. Just because you cited two examples where someone 'tried' to provide 'proof' doesn't mean the proof actually exists.

But then again, I'm ignorant on the subject, so what would I know.