Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackEleven
It is a big issue. The point is that is didn't have to be, and shouldn't have been.
There was really no basis to tell her she couldn't wear the longer skirt aside from a strict adherence to the company dress code. If there was some reason it was a safety concern or a hazard, then I think most people would agree the skirt should be not allowed. But as far as I can tell, the only reason to disallow it was to stick to the rules just for the sake of sticking to the rules.
In my opinion, the dangers posed from such rigid and inflexible thinking are a greater threat to society than making small, compassionate exceptions to the rules.
|
I never said it was a safetly issue.....it is simply another errosion of traditional Canadian values. It has been said a few times already but you can stick your head in the sand if you want.
Again, if you want to see what Canada will be like in 30 years....look at the UK now.
http://moderntribalist.blogspot.com/...lturalism.html
http://my.telegraph.co.uk/british_re...its_debits.htm
it's time for Britain to recognize that it is no longer a Christian nation and should embrace multiculturalism, according to a liberal think-tank
http://www.crosswalk.com/news/11558595/
Again, there is nothing wrong with believing in what you want, but the UK is essentially being taken over and estimates have it that by 2050, traditional UK residents will be the minority.