Quote:
Originally Posted by sclitheroe
From the story, she can clearly articulate her reasons for wanting the longer skirt, she is doing her best to accomodate her employer's dress code (she made the thing herself, same fabric, colour, etc. it's not like she is demanding her employer provide something that suits her), and there is no give in the system at all.
I think people who are intolerant of an individual's personal needs, and intolerant of their decision to make use of the legal and governmental framework established in Canada to address them, should move elsewhere.
Stupid rednecks.
-Scott
|
wow nice way to destroy your whole rant..
The bigger issue here, that is already pointed out is where do you draw the line, sure it doesnt seem like a big deal, until she made it a big deal by claiming it somehow voilates her human rights..You give her what she wants, than you are going to have to give everyone else what they wants..The company needs to stick to their policies for much bigger reasons.. the woman who took BC Hydro to the human rights commission because she thought their testing procedures to work as a lineman where discriminating against woman....the sikhs who took the Surrey Schools board to the human rights commisssion because they couldnt wear their kirpans to school..or the soccer official who disqualified a player for wearing a head garment...we cant possibly tailor things for every special interest group that comes along...