Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobblehead
|
More garbage and more spin, not surprised.
"The irony is that discussing intelligent design would not teach any student about any religious belief - the PBS materials, on the other hand, will," he said.
Laugh. When the core of their "theory" centres around a designer (god) and the "hard evidence" is largely from one source (bible) it's not hard to piece together that it is all about religion and not about science.
As a result, the institute is providing its own guide for educators, "The Theory of Intelligent Design," which will help teachers better understand the debate between Darwinian evolution and intelligent design.
Creationists explaining evolution = poop. Here come the straw man arguments or the "what if god designed/guided evolution?" argument and the jars of peanut butter.
"PBS gives a false definition of intelligent design that is a complete straw man argument," Luskin said. "Scientists who support intelligent design seek evidence of design in nature, and argue that such evidence points to intelligent design, based on our historical knowledge of cause and effect."
Wow, creationists saying other people are using straw man arguments. They clearly are grasping at straws. Also I would love to see that "evidence" that shows design in nature that's isn't the "it's too complex" argument or "the banana".
These creationists are doing nothing more than bullying their beliefs unto everyone else.