Quote:
Originally posted by mileflames+Oct 28 2004, 11:30 AM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (mileflames @ Oct 28 2004, 11:30 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>
Quote:
Originally posted by fotze@Oct 28 2004, 06:17 PM
<!--QuoteBegin-Snakeeye
|
Quote:
@Oct 24 2004, 08:07 PM
Well, they figured the Hitmen and Giants would see attendance increases due to the lockout, and they were right.
Calgary Hitmen after 7 home games:
2003 Avg: 6068 ; 2004 Avg: 7665 ; +26.32%
High: 8553 (6941 last year) ; Low: 6431 (4997 last year)
Rank: 1st in WHL
Vancouver Giants after 8 home games:
2003 Avg: 4337 ; 2004 Avg: 6766 ; +56.01%
High: 8864 (5584 last year) ; Low: 5589 (3488 last year)
Rank: 2nd in WHL
And, because I can:
Edmonton Roadrunners after 4 home games:
Avg: 9002 ; High: 16,001# ; Low: 6011
|
By those numbers shouldn't Edmonton be first?
|
You would Think so, BUT
AHL is not the WHL, one is pro players the other is kids!!!!!!! [/b][/quote]
...and to the 'Runners credit, pro hockey is more expensive...
I'm not at all interested in AHL hockey though. WHL all the way.