Quote:
Originally Posted by Iowa_Flames_Fan
I hear what you're saying, but the bolded part is to me the most persuasive counter-argument. I realize that in this case the guy was guilty, but the court has to make the decision on the basis of how reasonable that assumption was, and on whether the suspect's rights were protected, regardless of the actual outcome of the investigation.
Consider this: If he had been innocent, the story would be "Ghanan man Forced to take Dump while Customs Officers Watch." It would be a horrific violation of his rights.
Why don't they do an X-Ray? That's a lot less gross.
|
I would suggest that an x-ray is much more invasive and intrusive than making someone take a dump.