Quote:
Originally Posted by Regorium
How's that an example of a bot though? And your chance of that happening is something like ~1 in 750 so I guess it's not that big of a stretch.
I still think it is rigged. I notice that the first two tournaments I join right after a 2-3 month long hiatus I get ridiculously lucky. Then of course the luck "evens out" and I start doing somewhat poorly again. Seems like they're trying to give me a taste of winning so I stay longer and keep playing.
It's worked 3 times so far, I'd go back, join a $5 sit and go, and win it with no trouble at all even though I've probably gotten worse at poker from not playing as much.
|
This is an example of how I think it's rigged.
They need you to keep coming back. Whether your skill level is
high, medium, or poor. Everyone wins at some point.
The number of factors used is high, how much you login, play, and
deposit is in there.
Like I said before, you can rig it, but still have the stats come out
perfectly fine in the end. This is not difficult.
Now, what is claimed in the Absolute Poker fiasco is completely
different. I just don't understand why a VP and Director of
online gambling companies would risk it over < $4k profit. (I
believe he was in a $1k s&g)
ers
PS. I don't think that any bad beat I've had was a result of cheating.
Maybe a bot, but even then, the odds are all out there.