Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community
Old 12-14-2007, 10:56 AM   #1
Bingo
Owner
 
Bingo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default Projected Standings upate ... 12/14

road trip continues to move the Flames up ....

Now heading towards 85 points with the 8th place team on a 88 point pace ... basically right back in it. Lose the last three on the trip and they clearly fall back though.

Win streak is great, but they have to keep pushing it.

Bingo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2007, 11:01 AM   #2
looooob
Franchise Player
 
looooob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

well even if they take only a handful of points the rest of the roadtrip, they have got/kept themselves in the mix...now really it depends on putting back together a semblance of a home record
looooob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2007, 11:02 AM   #3
The Ditch
Powerplay Quarterback
 
The Ditch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Exp:
Default

Every time I see the list I get depressed a little. All the teams who are currently in a playoff position are good teams. Only semi questionable one I think would be Columbus but as I have been watching them play quite a bit on center ice, they are pretty damn good. Flames need to not let their recent win streak go to their head, they need to continue to play good hockey.
The Ditch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2007, 11:05 AM   #4
foofighter15
Participant
 
foofighter15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Undecided
Exp:
Send a message via AIM to foofighter15
Default

good to see they are moving up. Now if we could just get to a point where we could have a losing streak and fall into 8th. That would be nice
__________________


foofighter15 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2007, 11:05 AM   #5
looooob
Franchise Player
 
looooob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Ditch View Post
Every time I see the list I get depressed a little. All the teams who are currently in a playoff position are good teams. .
fair enough. if the Flames can't be one of the top 3 teams in the NW I figure they don't deserve to go...and I think all 3 ahead of them still have some flaws and could be catchable. obviously Flames have to brush up on their divisional record
looooob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2007, 11:52 AM   #6
Sylvanfan
Appealing my suspension
 
Sylvanfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: I ain't playing nose tackle in a 3-4 defence
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by looooob View Post
obviously Flames have to brush up on their divisional record

Actually Flames just have to brush up on their record against Vancouver. The team has been adequate against the other 3 teams posting a 6-3-2 record. That would project to like 14-7-3 over 24 games and thats a pretty decent mark (especially if all the wins are in regulation) It's that 0-2-1 vs. Vancouver that serves as a kick in the junk.

Last edited by Sylvanfan; 12-14-2007 at 11:56 AM.
Sylvanfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2007, 12:16 PM   #7
Textcritic
Referee
 
Textcritic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Kristiansand, Norway
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sylvanfan View Post
Actually Flames just have to brush up on their record against Vancouver. The team has been adequate against the other 3 teams posting a 6-3-2 record. That would project to like 14-7-3 over 24 games and thats a pretty decent mark (especially if all the wins are in regulation) It's that 0-2-1 vs. Vancouver that serves as a kick in the junk.
And I maintain that it is only a matter of time before that changes. Vancouver won two of those games on bounces, and in the 4–1 victory took advantage of a Flames team that was on its way to rock-bottom. I think that with how the Flames have played in even the last ten games, there is no reason to think that they cannot beat the Canucks.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by woob
"...harem warfare? like all your wives dressup and go paintballing?"
Biblical Texts Older than the Bible
Textcritic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2007, 04:00 PM   #8
driveway
A Fiddler Crab
 
driveway's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Taipei, Taiwan
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Textcritic View Post
And I maintain that it is only a matter of time before that changes. Vancouver won two of those games on bounces, and in the 4–1 victory took advantage of a Flames team that was on its way to rock-bottom. I think that with how the Flames have played in even the last ten games, there is no reason to think that they cannot beat the Canucks.
Even that game was closer than the score indicates. I was at that game and Vancouver's only decent goal was the Naslund-to-Mitchell goal where our defence stood around like those CBE statues.
driveway is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2007, 04:03 PM   #9
moon
Franchise Player
 
moon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lethbridge
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Ditch View Post
Every time I see the list I get depressed a little. All the teams who are currently in a playoff position are good teams. Only semi questionable one I think would be Columbus but as I have been watching them play quite a bit on center ice, they are pretty damn good. Flames need to not let their recent win streak go to their head, they need to continue to play good hockey.
Colorado, Colombus, St. Louis and Minnesota are all teams that are very questionable. I am not saying we aren't either but those are four teams that Calgary should be able to finish higher than.

What concerns me most is that Anaheim is so low right now. With their team now and adding Nieds and Selanne I can't see them finishing out of the play-offs which means we have to probably beat 2 of the four teams mentioned above.
moon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2007, 04:14 PM   #10
Textcritic
Referee
 
Textcritic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Kristiansand, Norway
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by moon View Post
Colorado, Colombus, St. Louis and Minnesota are all teams that are very questionable. I am not saying we aren't either but those are four teams that Calgary should be able to finish higher than.

What concerns me most is that Anaheim is so low right now. With their team now and adding Nieds and Selanne I can't see them finishing out of the play-offs which means we have to probably beat 2 of the four teams mentioned above.
But why limit it to only those four? Dallas and Vancouver should be included among the teams that the Flames can potentially leapfrog as well. 2/6 is not nearly as unreasonable as 2/4.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by woob
"...harem warfare? like all your wives dressup and go paintballing?"
Biblical Texts Older than the Bible
Textcritic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2007, 04:22 PM   #11
Bingo
Owner
 
Bingo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

We can worry about team A and team B and team C until we're blue in the face ... bottom line is Calgary has jumped three teams and have two left to hop for a playoff spot (a big move in team count), and are trending back towards that playoff line (85 points is a nice boost over the 75 from 10 days ago)

Get that trend above 90 and things should sort out well.
Bingo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2007, 04:25 PM   #12
Flames2007FIRE IT UP
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: May 2006
Exp:
Default

I really think aside from Detroit, LA, and Phoenix every other team still has a shot at the playoffs and falling out of the playoffs.

The eigth place team has 34 points, 2nd in the conference is 4 points up at 38 and the 13 seed has 30 points with games in hand. With about 50 games to go, that is very tight. This will likely be a very exciting season right to the end.

As a side note, the amazing thing from watching Detroit this year is the other team is always playing Detroit's style. Will any team be able to force them to play a different type of game?
Flames2007FIRE IT UP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2007, 09:54 PM   #13
McG
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: i,m on ur intarwebs...postin on ur thredz...
Exp:
Default

i think there will be a few surprises about who does and doesn't get in this year.

what is most appealling to me is that we are giving ourselves the chance to get closer and get it done.

after that horrible november...to be in striking distance...especially with the team still learning keenan's system...is promising.

and let's face it...we are trading in the currency of the fan. hope.
__________________
My current biggest fear? We somehow finish 4th, a lottery pick jumps ahead of us, and we pick 5th. Yup, can totally see that.

Cheering for Canes, Avs, and Panthers since we blew it up!
McG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2007, 04:01 AM   #14
krazycanuck
Won the Worst Son Ever Award
 
krazycanuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Sherwood Park
Exp:
Send a message via MSN to krazycanuck
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by driveway View Post
Vancouver's only decent goal was the Naslund-to-Mitchell goal where our defence stood around like those CBE statues.
Naked and Breast-feeding?
krazycanuck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2007, 04:13 AM   #15
driveway
A Fiddler Crab
 
driveway's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Taipei, Taiwan
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by krazycanuck View Post
Naked and Breast-feeding?
That's our defense!
driveway is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2007, 12:27 PM   #16
iamca
First Line Centre
 
iamca's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo View Post
We can worry about team A and team B and team C until we're blue in the face ... bottom line is Calgary has jumped three teams and have two left to hop for a playoff spot (a big move in team count), and are trending back towards that playoff line (85 points is a nice boost over the 75 from 10 days ago)

Get that trend above 90 and things should sort out well.
Another way of stating the same thought and is apropos this time of year, "If "if's" and "but's" were candy and nuts we'd all have a wonderful Christmas".

You can't worry about or control anything this early in the season, but you can do yourself a lot of good by beating teams in your own division and teams in the West.

One could argue that the points up for grabs against St. Louis and Columbus are more important than the previous 4 games against teams in the Eastern conference.
__________________
iamca is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2007, 01:04 PM   #17
Resolute 14
One of many who is too boring; thinks that there should be rules regarding grammar in custom user titles, and also makes moderators wonder if there is a charachter limit here. I mean come on- you would think that would be a limitation in the software
 
Resolute 14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by moon View Post
Colorado, Colombus, St. Louis and Minnesota are all teams that are very questionable. I am not saying we aren't either but those are four teams that Calgary should be able to finish higher than.

What concerns me most is that Anaheim is so low right now. With their team now and adding Nieds and Selanne I can't see them finishing out of the play-offs which means we have to probably beat 2 of the four teams mentioned above.
I really don't see why adding one or two players who have been dormant for half the year suddenly makes Anaheim world beaters. Yeah, we are talking about elite players, but skating and practicing does not get one into game shape. Very often, hold out players take a very long time to get their timing back.
Resolute 14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:12 AM.

Calgary Flames 2012-13
CP Chat!

CPRadio

Today's Hockey
 




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2009