Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community
Old 06-17-2007, 12:40 PM   #1
JiriHrdina
Radio Guy
 
JiriHrdina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Exp:
Default Looking back to the 2003 draft

Eric Francis takes a gander back at the 2003 draft - which of course netted the Flames Dion Phaneuf, but could've landed them another premiere dman.

http://calsun.canoe.ca/Sports/Hockey...67487-sun.html

Looking to add a few more picks, the Flames traded their second rounder (47th) to San Jose for a fourth and fifth rounder.
The Sharks immediately used the pick to grab Matt Carle while the host Predators snared Shea Weber two picks later.
"We had those guys in that range but the bottom line is we didn't take them," said Button yesterday, one week before the entry draft goes in Columbus, Ohio.

Ouch!
__________________
Who has Calgary's best burger? www.burgerquest.ca.

JiriHrdina is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2007, 12:44 PM   #2
KootenayFlamesFan
Commie Referee
 
KootenayFlamesFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Small town, B.C.
Exp:
Default

I didn't know much about Carle at the time, but I had heard of Weber and thought he'd be a decent choice for the Flames.

Although I fully admit I didn't think he'd be this good.

Phaneuf/Weber pairing? Yeah, that would be OK.
KootenayFlamesFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2007, 01:11 PM   #3
OutOfTheCube
First Line Centre
 
OutOfTheCube's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Exp:
Default

Hindsight's ALWAYS 20/20. Wouldn't it have been nice to have Phaneuf and Carle/Weber as our top two defenders for the next decade?
__________________



OutOfTheCube is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2007, 01:13 PM   #4
oldschoolcalgary
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Exp:
Default

yeah...its too bad - accumulating picks isnt' a bad thing, but a second for a 4th and a 5th? Doesn't seem like a move up to me...

a second for a three and 5 or 2 fours seems more even...

I like the spin on Fata too..."highly regarded"? that was a total reach at number 6...DT, went about where he was supposed to go (though samsanov was there too at the time and we passed)...but Fata?!
__________________
oldschoolcalgary is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2007, 01:28 PM   #5
cannon7
Needs More Cowbell
 
cannon7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Mojave Desert
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by oldschoolcalgary View Post
I like the spin on Fata too..."highly regarded"? that was a total reach at number 6...DT, went about where he was supposed to go (though samsanov was there too at the time and we passed)...but Fata?!
No actually Fata was highly regarded, in large part due to his speed. And 6th overall is about where people projected him to go. Infact the only knock on Rico Fata was his hockey sense.
cannon7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2007, 01:54 PM   #6
blankall
Ate 100 Treadmills
 
blankall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Did people bring up this topic for an excuse to say Rico Fata?
blankall is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2007, 01:56 PM   #7
chris lindberg
Franchise Player
 
chris lindberg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Exp:
Default

We could have had Weber instead of Ramholt eh?

I thought Darryl Sutter would pick the WHL defensemen over the Europeon myself.
But I never ever would have thought he would turn out so good either.

Let's all hope Darryl made the right choice in the long run.

Last edited by chris lindberg; 06-17-2007 at 01:58 PM.
chris lindberg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2007, 01:58 PM   #8
Sylvanfan
Appealing my suspension
 
Sylvanfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: I ain't playing nose tackle in a 3-4 defence
Exp:
Default

Yeah the Flames had the potential to grab a lot of good ones that day with picks 9, 39, & 47. But than again Nashville who did eventually get Weber had 2 second round picks before they did grab him. Similar with San Jose and Carle as they passed over him at 43, but did trade to get the 47 pick. Overall after Phaneuf the Flames did not do very well at the 2003 draft given what they had to work with. Still in the end if Ramholt can carve out an average career and you get Phaneuf it would be a successful draft. But no doubt, it could have been a great draft had say Phaneuf, Bergeron, and Weber all been selected.
__________________
"I don't think it's me personally, I really don't,"
Raiders QB JaMarcus Russell
Sylvanfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2007, 02:09 PM   #9
Resolute 14
One of many who is too boring; thinks that there should be rules regarding grammar in custom user titles, and also makes moderators wonder if there is a charachter limit here. I mean come on- you would think that would be a limitation in the software
 
Resolute 14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Exp:
Default

They can't all be like the 84 draft...
__________________

Resolute 14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2007, 02:16 PM   #10
Shawnski
Franchise Player
 
Shawnski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: In the Gin Bin
Exp:
Default

I believe the trade for our 47th pick was actually for Colorado's 97th pick (a third rounder, which we got Ryan Donally) and two San Jose picks (5th round, 143rd, Greg Moore, and 6th round, 173rd, Tyler Johnson).

http://www.usatoday.com/sports/hocke...rade-rdp_x.htm (although in that link, it says we traded with Colorado... doh! Journalists...)

So our local boy, the trained professional that doesn't think bloggers or fan sites are worthy... is once again.... off the mark. You would have thought him indicating we got Donally and Moore would have noticed that they were not from the 4th and 5th rounds respectively.

Nice journalism Erica.
Shawnski is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2007, 02:45 PM   #11
Ranchlander
Scoring Winger
 
Ranchlander's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Exp:
Default

Yea, and what if we grabbed Coburn or Kostitsyn (the two guys above and below Phaneuf) like many were predicting instead of Phaneuf. I'm COMPLETELY satisfied with that draft.

Francis irritates me.
Ranchlander is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2007, 02:52 PM   #12
Southern_Canuck
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Exp:
Default

I found it odd that in a column on Flames drafting, he lists "Flames players that were later-round gems", and only one was drafted by the Flames :


excerpt:
Here's a few Flames players that were later-round gems:
- Miikka Kiprusoff: Fifth round, 116th overall selection by San Jose in 1995.
- Stephane Yelle: Eighth round, 186th overall selection by New Jersey in 1992. - Matthew Lombardi: Third round, 90th overall selection by Flames in 2002.

I don't know the Flames draft history well enough to suggest actual Flames picks he could have listed there instead...

S_C
Southern_Canuck is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2007, 02:59 PM   #13
Resolute 14
One of many who is too boring; thinks that there should be rules regarding grammar in custom user titles, and also makes moderators wonder if there is a charachter limit here. I mean come on- you would think that would be a limitation in the software
 
Resolute 14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Southern_Canuck View Post
I don't know the Flames draft history well enough to suggest actual Flames picks he could have listed there instead...
The Flames haven't been able to pull diamonds from the rough like they used to. David Moss was a 7th round pick, 220th overall though. The only other Flames drafted by this club and playing in Calgary were all top 100 picks.
__________________

Resolute 14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2007, 03:05 PM   #14
Mike F
Franchise Player
 
Mike F's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Djibouti
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Southern_Canuck View Post
I found it odd that in a column on Flames drafting, he lists "Flames players that were later-round gems", and only one was drafted by the Flames :

I don't know the Flames draft history well enough to suggest actual Flames picks he could have listed there instead...

S_C
Well it's too early to peg him as a bona fide NHL regular, but picking Moss with the 220th pick (7th round) looks pretty good right now.
Mike F is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2007, 03:27 PM   #15
albertGQ
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Exp:
Default

We didn't pass up Samsonov for Fata, we passed him up for Tzachuk
albertGQ is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2007, 03:42 PM   #16
Canada 02
Franchise Player
 
Canada 02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Southern_Canuck View Post
I found it odd that in a column on Flames drafting, he lists "Flames players that were later-round gems", and only one was drafted by the Flames :


excerpt:
Here's a few Flames players that were later-round gems:
- Miikka Kiprusoff: Fifth round, 116th overall selection by San Jose in 1995.
- Stephane Yelle: Eighth round, 186th overall selection by New Jersey in 1992. - Matthew Lombardi: Third round, 90th overall selection by Flames in 2002.

I don't know the Flames draft history well enough to suggest actual Flames picks he could have listed there instead...

S_C
Toni Lydman, a 4th rounder, would be the only real good example in the last 10+ years. Some recent picks have a shot, like McElhinney, and Van der Gulik along with the aforementioned Moss.

Juuso Puustinen and Matt Keetley are a couple other recent mid/late rounders that look interesting

Last edited by Canada 02; 06-17-2007 at 03:45 PM.
Canada 02 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2007, 03:44 PM   #17
SebC
Franchise Player
 
SebC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Back in Calgary!
Exp:
Default

Ignore the rest of the article... the thing that interests me the most is that the Flames will not be drafting any goalies this year.

Another Tod Button statement implying that the Flames do not always draft the best player available.
SebC is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2007, 03:45 PM   #18
Resolute 14
One of many who is too boring; thinks that there should be rules regarding grammar in custom user titles, and also makes moderators wonder if there is a charachter limit here. I mean come on- you would think that would be a limitation in the software
 
Resolute 14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Exp:
Default

FWIW, the players the Flames drafted who went on to play in the NHL:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calgary_Flames_draft_picks

That 97 draft was just ugly...
__________________


Last edited by Resolute 14; 06-17-2007 at 03:47 PM.
Resolute 14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2007, 03:47 PM   #19
Sylvanfan
Appealing my suspension
 
Sylvanfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: I ain't playing nose tackle in a 3-4 defence
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SebC View Post

Another Tod Button statement implying that the Flames do not always draft the best player available.
Perhaps it does, but really past a certain cutoff point in the draft the players do become very even where the differences between about 5-6 players becomes a case of pick em.
__________________
"I don't think it's me personally, I really don't,"
Raiders QB JaMarcus Russell
Sylvanfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2007, 03:56 PM   #20
Reggie Dunlop
All I can get
 
Reggie Dunlop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Always right
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SebC View Post
Ignore the rest of the article... the thing that interests me the most is that the Flames will not be drafting any goalies this year.

Another Tod Button statement implying that the Flames do not always draft the best player available.
That's funny, I could've sworn they took some kid named Leland Irving in the first round precisely because he was "best player available."
__________________
Canucks fans are basically bad people.
Reggie Dunlop is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:39 PM.

Calgary Flames 2012-13
CP Chat!

CPRadio

Today's Hockey
 




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2009