It's for real!! OMG so freaking excited!!! : AIR GUITAR :
The only thing that sucks is no Carlin
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MoneyGuy
I look forward to our wager. I'm feeling confident. I'm thinking your signature, should I win, will be something like this:
MoneyGuy is smarter than me 'cause he bet on the Oilers to beat the Flames in the standings. Flames suck!
Of course, if the Flames get lucky and top the Oilers I will put the reverse into my signature, or something else of your creation. What do you think? What sig would you like me to put up?
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Lanny'sDaMan For This Useful Post:
Location: Apparently, on a mighty High Horse. *shrug* Who knew cheering for the Flames to win was bad?
Exp:
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MoneyGuy
I look forward to our wager. I'm feeling confident. I'm thinking your signature, should I win, will be something like this:
MoneyGuy is smarter than me 'cause he bet on the Oilers to beat the Flames in the standings. Flames suck!
Of course, if the Flames get lucky and top the Oilers I will put the reverse into my signature, or something else of your creation. What do you think? What sig would you like me to put up?
Location: Apparently, on a mighty High Horse. *shrug* Who knew cheering for the Flames to win was bad?
Exp:
Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainCrunch
What are the chances of Reeves and Alex Winters doing this. I don't think that Winters has even done much in the last 10 years.
From what I've found on Google they are both 100% in.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MoneyGuy
I look forward to our wager. I'm feeling confident. I'm thinking your signature, should I win, will be something like this:
MoneyGuy is smarter than me 'cause he bet on the Oilers to beat the Flames in the standings. Flames suck!
Of course, if the Flames get lucky and top the Oilers I will put the reverse into my signature, or something else of your creation. What do you think? What sig would you like me to put up?
One of many who is too boring; thinks that there should be rules regarding grammar in custom user titles, and also makes moderators wonder if there is a charachter limit here. I mean come on- you would think that would be a limitation in the software
Join Date: Jan 2003
Exp:
I am having a very hard time picturing a way in which this movie doesn't completely suck. The first two worked because they were basically teen-oriented stoner movies. I don't see how that theme works with stars in their late 40s.
__________________
The Following User Says Thank You to Resolute 14 For This Useful Post:
I am having a very hard time picturing a way in which this movie doesn't completely suck. The first two worked because they were basically teen-oriented stoner movies. I don't see how that theme works with stars in their late 40s.
Cheech and Chong say hi(gh?).
EDIT: For the record I predict a very high amount of suck for this movie.
__________________ Uncertainty is an uncomfortable position.
But certainty is an absurd one.
This is a classic case of a movie being cool back when you first saw it when you were younger.
Go back and watch these movies, they're absolute garbage. I can't even put it in the "so bad, it's good" category. They're just bad and nearly unwatchable.
I am curious to see how this turns out given that they're both in their late 40's.
__________________
Special thanks to Dion for making my new sig.
Can't get enough of my annoying ramblings? Watch me do it in 140 characters or less. Follow me @tmart1040 https://twitter.com/#!/Tmart1040
Last edited by VANFLAMESFAN; 05-23-2012 at 02:44 PM.
Location: Apparently, on a mighty High Horse. *shrug* Who knew cheering for the Flames to win was bad?
Exp:
Quote:
Originally Posted by VANFLAMESFAN
This is a classic case of a movie being cool back when you first saw it when you were younger.
Go back and watch these movies, they're absolute garbage. I can't even put it in the "so bad, it's good" category. They're just bad and nearly unwatchable.
I am curious to see how this turns out given that they're both in their late 40's.
I could not disagree more. I just finished watching both of them this past weekend, and they both hold up very well in my opinion.Almost as well as Goonies.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MoneyGuy
I look forward to our wager. I'm feeling confident. I'm thinking your signature, should I win, will be something like this:
MoneyGuy is smarter than me 'cause he bet on the Oilers to beat the Flames in the standings. Flames suck!
Of course, if the Flames get lucky and top the Oilers I will put the reverse into my signature, or something else of your creation. What do you think? What sig would you like me to put up?
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Lanny'sDaMan For This Useful Post:
I think the big question here is: Does Keanu need the paycheck that badly? Are the Matrix residuals not making him enough? I hope this doesn't suck but a lot of the warning signs are there. They could go for a re-invention perhaps.
__________________
"**** you? Naw, son, I'm going to make you. Mother******* going to be wiping their ass with Johnnie Cochran's memory and carrying your business card in every damn pocket before we done."
I am having a very hard time picturing a way in which this movie doesn't completely suck. The first two worked because they were basically teen-oriented stoner movies. I don't see how that theme works with stars in their late 40s.
As long as they aim it an audience in their 30-40s, this could be hilarious, as long as the jokes are good. It could be like Hot Tub Time Machine with "nostalgic" type jokes aimed an adult audience. Anyways, this is what I'm hoping for. A movie that doesn't take itself seriously with well written jokes.
It's for real!! OMG so freaking excited!!! : AIR GUITAR :
The only thing that sucks is no Carlin
No Clarence Clemons either.
__________________ I wish the heck I could like fish, I just hate the taste of it . . . I wish I could eat one, they look so good . . . - Gil Fisher (The Fishin' Musician):
Bill and ted's 3!!!!!!!
hehe
