2014/2015 Trade Speculation and Rumors

[dammage79]

Andy Strickland ‏@andystrickland 2m2 minutes ago
Report of #Blackhawks player fight is news to some who would certainly know

[Jacks]

Originally Posted by sureLoss

Roy admits the Avs are looking into moving ROR, but says he would be surprised if they traded him.

http://www.nicholsonhockey.com/worth...trades-oreilly

I wouldn't pay much for ROR without having an extension in place and that can't be done until the off season.

[keenan87]

Any chance we can pick up Mike Green for Curtis Glencross+Deryk Engellend?

[Imported_Aussie]

Originally Posted by keenan87

Any chance we can pick up Mike Green for Curtis Glencross+Deryk Engellend?

No

[ForeverFlameFan]

Originally Posted by keenan87

Any chance we can pick up Mike Green for Curtis Glencross+Deryk Engellend?

Do you really need someone answering this for you?

[northcrunk]

Originally Posted by keenan87

Any chance we can pick up Mike Green for Curtis Glencross+Deryk Engellend?

It would be great to see Greener here. Don't be surprised if he signs in the off-season.

[nixon45]

Monday can't come soon enough

[Vinny01]

Originally Posted by northcrunk

It would be great to see Greener here. Don't be surprised if he signs in the off-season.

I heard the opposite and he doesn't have any desire to play here

[flamesfan55]

Originally Posted by Vinny01

I heard the opposite and he doesn't have any desire to play here

That was his dad that indicated that, correct?

[Muffins]

Originally Posted by Vinny01

I heard the opposite and he doesn't have any desire to play here

Probably because Vespa's don't do well in Calgary.

[keenan87]

Originally Posted by ForeverFlameFan

Do you really need someone answering this for you?

He is a UFA and probably not going to sign.. If the Caps pick up a guy like Yandle, maybe he becomes expendable and this deal looks good for them. Relax

[ForeverFlameFan]

Originally Posted by keenan87

He is a UFA and probably not going to sign.. If the Caps pick up a guy like Yandle, maybe he becomes expendable and this deal looks good for them. Relax

Wait, you actually think that deal makes sense for the Caps?

[keenan87]

Originally Posted by ForeverFlameFan

Wait, you actually think that deal makes sense for the Caps?

If you read my post, if they pick up a different d-man, they might not mind Glencross' cheap salary (maybe not include Engellend).

Why do you think that wouldn't make sense?

[ForeverFlameFan]

Originally Posted by keenan87

If you read my post, if they pick up a different d-man, they might not mind Glencross' cheap salary (maybe not include Engellend).

Why do you think that wouldn't make sense?

Because your trade means quantity > quality. Washington loses big time.

[keenan87]

Originally Posted by ForeverFlameFan

Because your trade means quantity > quality. Washington loses big time.

They will potentially be losing Green in a few months anyway. Glencross is the same way (in my last post, I said to maybe take out Engellend)..

If you have a surplus of D-Man (which is another assumption I made) and need a top 6 forward… Why would they not make that deal? Neither player has any term on their contract.

You still haven't given much of a reason for why it wouldn't work for them if Washington picks up a top 4 d-man. Quantity over Quality is not much of a basis for an argument.

[ForeverFlameFan]

Originally Posted by keenan87

They will potentially be losing Green in a few months anyway. Glencross is the same way (in my last post, I said to maybe take out Engellend)..

If you have a surplus of D-Man (which is another assumption I made) and need a top 6 forward… Why would they not make that deal? Neither player has any term on their contract.

You still haven't given much of a reason for why it wouldn't work for them if Washington picks up a top 4 d-man. Quantity over Quality is not much of a basis for an argument.

Green is much more valuable than Glencross. I don't know what else there is to say. Adding in Engelland doesn't even help. You might as well start having the mentality of having Engelland for another 2 years after this one, because no team wants his contract.

[Weitz]

Originally Posted by keenan87

They will potentially be losing Green in a few months anyway. Glencross is the same way (in my last post, I said to maybe take out Engellend)..

If you have a surplus of D-Man (which is another assumption I made) and need a top 6 forward… Why would they not make that deal? Neither player has any term on their contract.

You still haven't given much of a reason for why it wouldn't work for them if Washington picks up a top 4 d-man. Quantity over Quality is not much of a basis for an argument.

Probably because they are looking to go on a run and adding glencross while losing Green likely makes them a worse team.

[Bourque's Twin]

Originally Posted by Weitz

Probably because they are looking to go on a run and adding glencross while losing Green likely makes them a worse team.

Not necessarily. Green is on their 3rd pairing. Glencross could play with Ovi and Backstrom.

[JohnnySkittles]

They can get Glencross for a lot cheaper then giving up Green.

[sureLoss]

@AGrossRecord: Tonight's ARIZ-NYR scouting list: Pens (2), Flames (2), Preds, Blue Jackets, Blackhawks (2), Red Wings, Stars (2), Caps, Sens, Avs.

Flames continue to scout Coyotes