Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-08-2016, 06:43 PM   #41
Finger Cookin
Franchise Player
 
Finger Cookin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Resolute 14 View Post
Avoid it for the next decade because of how bad the current conditions are.

Avoid it for the following decade because of this work.

2036 is going to be an awesome year for a drive!
Only if the 2036 population is the same as the 2016 population. But perhaps that will be addressed in the 2046 plans.
Finger Cookin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2016, 11:45 PM   #42
CroFlames
Franchise Player
 
CroFlames's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Exp:
Default

Build thoroughfares on raised decks, and the boulevard below said decks can have the intersections. Crowchild, TransCanada and Glenmore should all be freeways with no lights on them.

Build light rail transit in tunnels below grade.

Cities all over the world do this. Calgary isn't exactly a poor city. It can be done.
CroFlames is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2016, 06:05 AM   #43
Fuzz
Franchise Player
 
Fuzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Exp:
Default

Raised deck freeways are ugly as hell. I'd rather no freeway than one of those cutting through the area. I can't imagine it would be popular. Cities like Seattle are getting rid of theirs, because they realized how ugly it was and it destroyed their waterfront.
Fuzz is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Fuzz For This Useful Post:
Old 06-09-2016, 07:43 AM   #44
EldrickOnIce
Franchise Player
 
EldrickOnIce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Chicago
Exp:
Default

Montreal knocking down all their raised deck freeways/interchanges that serve Champlain bridge and connectors into highways 40 and 20 as well... before they fall down. 5 year project, but will be so much nicer/better. That was/is some ugly ####
EldrickOnIce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2016, 08:01 AM   #45
DoubleK
Franchise Player
 
DoubleK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Seattle, WA
Exp:
Default

I'm liking the tunnel option.
__________________
It's only game. Why you heff to be mad?
DoubleK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2016, 10:56 AM   #46
rd_aaron
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default

Maybe this was posted elsewhere, but here's the Deerfoot Trail Study. You can add comments/suggestions on the map as you see fit. Looks like this has only been up for a couple weeks. Open houses start mid-June.

http://engage.calgary.ca/deerfoot
rd_aaron is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to rd_aaron For This Useful Post:
Old 09-29-2016, 09:55 AM   #47
Joborule
Franchise Player
 
Joborule's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Exp:
Default

Crowchild study now in the 5th phase and they have posed the draft of the short, medium, and long term recommendations.

http://crowchild.engagingplans.org/c...recommendation
Joborule is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Joborule For This Useful Post:
Old 12-06-2016, 12:26 PM   #48
Bunk
Franchise Player
 
Bunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Exp:
Default

A good overview of the plan for Crowchild Trail.

__________________
Trust the snake.

Last edited by Bunk; 12-06-2016 at 03:12 PM. Reason: I dumb
Bunk is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Bunk For This Useful Post:
Old 12-06-2016, 12:34 PM   #49
Cecil Terwilliger
That Crazy Guy at the Bus Stop
 
Cecil Terwilliger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Springfield Penitentiary
Exp:
Default

They mention two year timeline in the video. Did they mean the entire project? Because that would be amazing.

This is without a doubt the number one infrastructure requirement in the city. Three lanes each way no lights. What a change from 15 years ago when there were lights at every single intersection between tuscany and Bow Trail.
Cecil Terwilliger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2016, 12:55 PM   #50
Kavvy
Self Imposed Exile
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cecil Terwilliger View Post
They mention two year timeline in the video. Did they mean the entire project? Because that would be amazing.

This is without a doubt the number one infrastructure requirement in the city. Three lanes each way no lights. What a change from 15 years ago when there were lights at every single intersection between tuscany and Bow Trail.
I think short term goals are 2 years (if funding approved), long term goals are TBD.

Short term goals include 1 extra lane on the bridge and some improvements to how Bow merges on with memorial, but not 3 lanes all the way through (entire new bridges at multiple locations are needed according to the video).
Kavvy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2016, 02:05 PM   #51
ken0042
Playboy Mansion Poolboy
 
ken0042's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Close enough to make a beer run during a TV timeout
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bunk View Post
Not Ring Road related, but major road related (given lack of another thread)
Moved your post to the Crowchild Trail thread.
ken0042 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to ken0042 For This Useful Post:
Old 12-06-2016, 02:46 PM   #52
Arsenal14
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Arsenal14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kavvy View Post
I think short term goals are 2 years (if funding approved), long term goals are TBD.

Short term goals include 1 extra lane on the bridge and some improvements to how Bow merges on with memorial, but not 3 lanes all the way through (entire new bridges at multiple locations are needed according to the video).
Yeah, on the project website it breaks it down better into short, medium (10+ years) and long term (30+ years). Short term is things like adding another lane across the Bow River, medium term is most of the new interchanges, long term is a new bridge over the Bow River.
Arsenal14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2016, 03:11 PM   #53
Bunk
Franchise Player
 
Bunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ken0042 View Post
Moved your post to the Crowchild Trail thread.
D'oh! Sorry.
__________________
Trust the snake.
Bunk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2016, 06:35 PM   #54
Ducay
Franchise Player
 
Ducay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Exp:
Default

Good overview, but I realllllly dislike they have traffic circles on the off/on ramps in spots.

I don't travel this area often, but from us SW folks who have to deal with the "new" interchange at 37th St & Glenmore, traffic circles are too slow to deal with large volumes of people coming off a thoroughfare. Luckily in this case the interchange is temporary until the ring road connects nearby.
Ducay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2016, 08:00 PM   #55
Canehdianman
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ducay View Post
Good overview, but I realllllly dislike they have traffic circles on the off/on ramps in spots.

I don't travel this area often, but from us SW folks who have to deal with the "new" interchange at 37th St & Glenmore, traffic circles are too slow to deal with large volumes of people coming off a thoroughfare. Luckily in this case the interchange is temporary until the ring road connects nearby.
Only because drivers refuse to nut up.
Canehdianman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2016, 09:35 PM   #56
Coach
Franchise Player
 
Coach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ducay View Post
Good overview, but I realllllly dislike they have traffic circles on the off/on ramps in spots.

I don't travel this area often, but from us SW folks who have to deal with the "new" interchange at 37th St & Glenmore, traffic circles are too slow to deal with large volumes of people coming off a thoroughfare. Luckily in this case the interchange is temporary until the ring road connects nearby.
Those traffic circles along university drive are perfect. It's an odd area to get in and out of, and the traffic there is fairly minimal relative to Crowchild.

This is should be done ASAP IMO. It would instantly turn that area from heavy gridlock to a pretty easy drive in and out of downtown and along Crowchild during rush hour.

One thing I'd like to see is a left-hand exit ramp that went under the bridge and connected to Memorial, as the weaving there is a large part of the issue. But having an extra lane would probably do wonders for it as is.
__________________
Coach is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Coach For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:03 AM.

Calgary Flames
2023-24




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021