Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-23-2017, 04:25 PM   #701
TheScorpion
First round-bust
 
TheScorpion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: speculating about AHL players
Exp:
Default

Bettman on 960: "A 2026 Olympics in Calgary will need a new arena"
__________________
"This has been TheScorpion's shtick for years. All these hot takes, clickbait nonsense just to feed his social media algorithms." –Tuco

TheScorpion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2017, 04:29 PM   #702
jayswin
Celebrated Square Root Day
 
jayswin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheScorpion View Post
Bettman on 960: "A 2026 Olympics in Calgary will need a new arena"
That's correct Gary, the great thing is the city can just use the new Flames arena which will likely be open three to four years before the Olympics.
jayswin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2017, 06:44 PM   #703
Hack&Lube
Atomic Nerd
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

I feel that without a big rebound in the energy sector that these games won't happen.

Correct me if I'm wrong but I remember 1988 and the oil companies going balls out with sponsorships and events and that probably helped the games stay profitable.
Hack&Lube is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2017, 07:31 PM   #704
Rhettzky
Franchise Player
 
Rhettzky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Section 222
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hack&Lube View Post
I feel that without a big rebound in the energy sector that these games won't happen.

Correct me if I'm wrong but I remember 1988 and the oil companies going balls out with sponsorships and events and that probably helped the games stay profitable.
Pretty sure people were walking away from houses in the 80's due to the Oil Glut.

Nevermind, looks like we were recovering around then and that's why we got the Olympics.
__________________
Go Flames Go!!
Rhettzky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2017, 08:09 PM   #705
OldDutch
#1 Goaltender
 
OldDutch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: North of the River, South of the Bluff
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rhettzky View Post
Pretty sure people were walking away from houses in the 80's due to the Oil Glut.

Nevermind, looks like we were recovering around then and that's why we got the Olympics.
I thought we were in the midst of NEP in the early 80s when we got the games. Also late 80s Calgary was recovering from the mid 80s oil price crash but it was far from a boom town.

The Olympic bid was a bold vision to think big amidt tough times in Calgary. Raise civic pride. At least that is how my very young self remembers.
OldDutch is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to OldDutch For This Useful Post:
Old 06-26-2017, 10:08 AM   #706
Frequitude
Franchise Player
 
Frequitude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: 555 Saddledome Rise SE
Exp:
Default

'86 is when people were walking away from their homes. The price of oil dropped from $70 in November 1985 to $23 by March 1986 and interest rates were around 10% (though down from 20% in the early 80's). So definitely right before the Olympics.
Frequitude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2017, 03:56 PM   #707
Tyler
Franchise Player
 
Tyler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Calgary gets more thinking time on 2026 bid from International Olympic Committee

Quote:
Calgary has extra time to mull a possible bid for the 2026 Winter Olympics and Paralympics because the International Olympic Committee has shifted its timelines.

The IOC announced Tuesday in Lausanne, Switzerland, that the "invitation phase" starting in September for 2026 bids will be expanded to a full year to give "cities more time and more help to develop their proposals."

With the winning bid to be announced September, 2019, the formal bid process has been shortened to one year from two which reduces costs, the IOC said in a statement on its website.

"In a nutshell, the candidature process which worked so well in the past has become too expensive and too onerous for this new political reality," IOC president Thomas Bach said.
http://www.sportsnet.ca/olympics/cal...pic-committee/
Tyler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2017, 04:07 PM   #708
jayswin
Celebrated Square Root Day
 
jayswin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

At this point it really feels like the IOC is basically saying "Hey, Calgary, we want and need you, just tell us what you need to make this happen and we'll do it!".
jayswin is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to jayswin For This Useful Post:
Old 07-11-2017, 04:27 PM   #709
RM14
First Line Centre
 
RM14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

IOC might be recognizing the fall election as a bid killer
RM14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2017, 04:31 PM   #710
Violator
On Hiatus
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Calgary Alberta Canada
Exp:
Default

Couple hundred million towards a new arena would be nice of the IOC.
Violator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2017, 04:38 PM   #711
Ozy_Flame

Posted the 6 millionth post!
 
Ozy_Flame's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RM14 View Post
IOC might be recognizing the fall election as a bid killer
I doubt the IOC is extending proposal time to accomodate a Calgary municipal election.
Ozy_Flame is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Ozy_Flame For This Useful Post:
Old 07-11-2017, 04:42 PM   #712
RM14
First Line Centre
 
RM14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ozy_Flame View Post
I doubt the IOC is extending proposal time to accomodate a Calgary municipal election.
I am sure they are aware of it after watching many other government debates end bids in recent years. The might not even get a bid from Calgary if they didn't change the deadline. Leaving the IOC with Switzerland and Austria. Switzerland might be a awesome location..
RM14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2017, 06:51 PM   #713
Senator Clay Davis
Franchise Player
 
Senator Clay Davis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Maryland State House, Annapolis
Exp:
Default

RM14 is pretty much right. When hosting the Olympics has gone to a straight vote, it keeps losing. If they have to submit a bid before the municipal election, it becomes a quasi-plebiscite, and that probably keeps all but the safest councilors from supporting it since it's going to be viewed as a tax (increase) issue. Politicians who feel insulated, like new councilors who have years before the next election, are significantly more likely to support something like this. Though it still doesn't change the federal or provincial equations which are far more important.

It does suggest the IOC is desperate for Calgary to bid, which in turn suggests no one is actually going to bid at this point in time. I continue to hold the belief of letting the IOC sweat this out, don't bid until they get extremely desperate and this might actually work out to Calgary's advantage somehow.
__________________
"Think I'm gonna be the scapegoat for the whole damn machine? Sheeee......."

Last edited by Senator Clay Davis; 07-11-2017 at 06:53 PM.
Senator Clay Davis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2017, 02:32 PM   #714
Tyler
Franchise Player
 
Tyler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Nenshi doubts Calgary will approve 2026 Olympic bid without major changes in IOC contract

Quote:
Calgary will likely reject another Olympic bid or put off its decision until 2018, Mayor Naheed Nenshi said Wednesday.

The mayor said he's "not a big fan" of the cost estimates already presented by the Calgary Bid Exploration Committee, which projects a $2.4-billion shortfall between revenue and costs if the city were to host the Winter Olympics in 2026.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calgar...cite-1.4212755
Tyler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2017, 03:07 PM   #715
Gaudfather
Franchise Player
 
Gaudfather's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Right behind you.
Exp:
Default

Most projections tend to underestimate costs and over estimate revenues. So the shortfall could realistically be closer to $3 billion than $2.4 billion.

I would have no problem with Nenshi telling the IOC to get stuffed!
Gaudfather is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2017, 03:14 PM   #716
Bunk
Franchise Player
 
Bunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Exp:
Default

I take this as a bit of a stress test to see how far the IOC is willing to bend on the revenues side.

It will be interesting to see the messages from the IOC given how willing they've been to talk about flexibility.
__________________
Trust the snake.
Bunk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2017, 03:26 PM   #717
Muta
Franchise Player
 
Muta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Auckland, NZ
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gaudfather View Post
Most projections tend to underestimate costs and over estimate revenues. So the shortfall could realistically be closer to $3 billion than $2.4 billion.

I would have no problem with Nenshi telling the IOC to get stuffed!
Suggesting they're off by $700M, with no evidence or research on your part, is quite presumptive for you to make and say with such a matter-of-fact tone, and dare I say insulting to the committee that's been put together and has crunched the numbers with great scrutiny.
Muta is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Muta For This Useful Post:
Old 07-19-2017, 03:29 PM   #718
Weitz
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Exp:
Default

nm
Weitz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2017, 03:40 PM   #719
Ozy_Flame

Posted the 6 millionth post!
 
Ozy_Flame's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Exp:
Default

I'm starting to think that in order for this to work in Calgary, the IOC is going to have to pony up for most of - if not all of - a new hockey arena. They have boatloads of money and are going to have to convince the City and its people they aren't going to leave town with their traditional parting gift of a scorched earth wake of destruction.
Ozy_Flame is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2017, 03:50 PM   #720
You Need a Thneed
Voted for Kodos
 
You Need a Thneed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Exp:
Default

My suggestion is that the IOC has to give us either 2030 or 2034 on top of 2026.

But perhaps even the revenue from a second Olympics doesn't pay - you would save on Intrastructure, but still have additional security costs, etc.
__________________
My LinkedIn Profile.
You Need a Thneed is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:58 AM.

Calgary Flames
2023-24




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021