Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-30-2024, 09:02 PM   #121
dissentowner
Franchise Player
 
dissentowner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SW Ontario
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aarongavey View Post
He is the best dman I have seen in the OHL since I started watching the OHL in a serious way 7 years ago. Better than Bouchard, better than Drysdale, better than Mintyukov. He is just a complete dman, Pietrangelo is a good comparable, not sure he has Alex’s mean streak yet.
Ya, I will be shocked if he makes it past 5. I could even see him go 2nd.
dissentowner is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to dissentowner For This Useful Post:
Old 03-30-2024, 09:23 PM   #122
Groot
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Groot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

So Parekh is a bonafide top-10 prospect in this draft, and considered a top offensive d-man prospect.

He's only 15 months younger than Brzustewicz and had 4 more points than him this season (Parekh was 1st for D, Brzustewicz was 2nd)

Where would Brzustewicz rank amongst this draft crop?

I think we already have a stud D prospect that took a huge leap forward this year.
Groot is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Groot For This Useful Post:
Old 03-30-2024, 09:26 PM   #123
Jiri Hrdina
Franchise Player
 
Jiri Hrdina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Groot View Post
So Parekh is a bonafide top-10 prospect in this draft, and considered a top offensive d-man prospect.

He's only 15 months younger than Brzustewicz and had 4 more points than him this season (Parekh was 1st for D, Brzustewicz was 2nd)

Where would Brzustewicz rank amongst this draft crop?

I think we already have a stud D prospect that took a huge leap forward this year.
In a redraft he probably goes late first or early second.
He projects as a top 4 guy who also is on your PP
Jiri Hrdina is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2024, 09:28 PM   #124
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jiri Hrdina View Post
In a redraft he probably goes late first or early second.
He projects as a top 4 guy who also is on your PP
I think he's easily a late 1st
Enoch Root is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Enoch Root For This Useful Post:
Old 03-30-2024, 09:30 PM   #125
dissentowner
Franchise Player
 
dissentowner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SW Ontario
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Groot View Post
So Parekh is a bonafide top-10 prospect in this draft, and considered a top offensive d-man prospect.

He's only 15 months younger than Brzustewicz and had 4 more points than him this season (Parekh was 1st for D, Brzustewicz was 2nd)

Where would Brzustewicz rank amongst this draft crop?

I think we already have a stud D prospect that took a huge leap forward this year.
Honestly looking at this draft it's hard to say. If I had to guess anywhere after 20 in the 1st round. I think he would certainly go in round 1. I have seen quite a bit of him this year and he is really really smart. I think his floor is a bottom pairing PP specialist. His ceiling is a guy that could challenge for Norris trophies.
dissentowner is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to dissentowner For This Useful Post:
Old 03-30-2024, 09:33 PM   #126
1qqaaz
Franchise Player
 
1qqaaz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Indiana
Exp:
Default

But really, I'd probably have Brzustewicz around #20 and Honzek around #45 as of now. Brzustewicz and Honzek have almost swapped draft positions in my mind. Moreso Brzustewicz rising than Honzek decreasing.
1qqaaz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2024, 10:18 PM   #127
Sandman
Franchise Player
 
Sandman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Snuffleupagus View Post
Hmmm, I'll ask about that but about 2 weeks ago all I was told he was having trouble gripping his stick
Damn, that ain't good either.
Sandman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2024, 10:24 PM   #128
Sandman
Franchise Player
 
Sandman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Groot View Post
So Parekh is a bonafide top-10 prospect in this draft, and considered a top offensive d-man prospect.

He's only 15 months younger than Brzustewicz and had 4 more points than him this season (Parekh was 1st for D, Brzustewicz was 2nd)

Where would Brzustewicz rank amongst this draft crop?

I think we already have a stud D prospect that took a huge leap forward this year.
Not sure, because I was shocked at how late he was taken in his actual draft, but I would say late 1st. He has a very real shot at being a top-pairing D at some point. I really like the kid.

Last edited by Sandman; 03-30-2024 at 10:27 PM.
Sandman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2024, 10:31 PM   #129
Sandman
Franchise Player
 
Sandman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1qqaaz View Post
Roger McQueen may be the best WHL player available in next year's draft. I wonder how he compares to Lindstrom. He's bigger than Lindstrom and is having better production at the same age. But I haven't seen him play.
I love McQueen. I would say he's not as fast or as mean as Lindstrom, but I think he may have more offensive ability and creativity. He was often dominant at the Hlinka, and he was a younger player there.
Sandman is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Sandman For This Useful Post:
Old 03-31-2024, 12:14 AM   #130
Snuffleupagus
Franchise Player
 
Snuffleupagus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sandman View Post
I love McQueen. I would say he's not as fast or as mean as Lindstrom, but I think he may have more offensive ability and creativity. He was often dominant at the Hlinka, and he was a younger player there.
McQueen is a very smart player with high end puck skills and a good skater, and yes he was very good at the Hlinka even know they played him on the wing, his main problem is he can get rather lazy for long stretches. Good news is he has a year to put the compound W on his warts.
Snuffleupagus is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Snuffleupagus For This Useful Post:
Old 03-31-2024, 01:00 AM   #131
Bourque's Twin
First Line Centre
 
Bourque's Twin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Section 120
Exp:
Default

The Flames look like they’ll be drafting 8-10. I think the players almost guaranteed to be chosen by that spot are Celebrini, Demidov, Levshunov, Dickenson, Catton and Parekh. If any of those guys slide, you have to grab him.

Lindstrom could slide because of injuries.
Silayev could slide because he may have a lesser likelihood of reaching his ceiling.
Eiserman could slide because he’s 1 dimensional.

The Flames will have a choice of whoever slides or Buium, Iginla, Yakemchuk, and Helenius.

I think they should just take Iginla unless one from the top tier lands in their spot.
Bourque's Twin is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2024, 01:45 AM   #132
jg13
Franchise Player
 
jg13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

I have a feeling if we draft 8 Lindstrom will be available due to injuries.
jg13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2024, 02:34 AM   #133
Snuffleupagus
Franchise Player
 
Snuffleupagus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bourque's Twin View Post
The Flames look like they’ll be drafting 8-10. I think the players almost guaranteed to be chosen by that spot are Celebrini, Demidov, Levshunov, Dickenson, Catton and Parekh. If any of those guys slide, you have to grab him.

Lindstrom could slide because of injuries.
Silayev could slide because he may have a lesser likelihood of reaching his ceiling.
Eiserman could slide because he’s 1 dimensional.

The Flames will have a choice of whoever slides or Buium, Iginla, Yakemchuk, and Helenius.

I think they should just take Iginla unless one from the top tier lands in their spot.
Catton > Iginla > or the next top forward regardless, this team needs a highly skilled forward more than a skilled Dman that would likely take 4-5 years to make any impact. as much as I like some of the D available this year the flames already have 3 young offensive defensemen in the pipe, hopefully one or two are ready in 2 years.
Snuffleupagus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2024, 06:15 AM   #134
Aarongavey
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Snuffleupagus View Post
Catton > Iginla > or the next top forward regardless, this team needs a highly skilled forward more than a skilled Dman that would likely take 4-5 years to make any impact. as much as I like some of the D available this year the flames already have 3 young offensive defensemen in the pipe, hopefully one or two are ready in 2 years.
You could take a Kotkaneiemi or a Hayton up front and wait forever for them to make an impact or you could take a Quinn Hughes or an Evan Bouchard and have them make an immediate impact. Quinn Hughes is the most impactful player taken in his draft year (Dahlin probably a close second).

You could take a Turcotte or a Dach up front and wait forever for them to make an impact or you could take a Seider or a Byram on the backend and have them immediately jump in and make an impact. Seider is the most impactful player taken in his draft outside of first overall.

It really depends on whether the Flames need a guy sooner (take the dmen then) or if they have the ability to wait (take the forward).

Last edited by Aarongavey; 03-31-2024 at 06:17 AM.
Aarongavey is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2024, 07:47 AM   #135
TOfan
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Snuffleupagus View Post
Hmmm, I'll ask about that but about 2 weeks ago all I was told he was having trouble gripping his stick
If it’s true that Lindstrom is dealing with some ailment of one kind or another, his performance at the combine should be interesting. I don’t know what all the exercises are, but I assume there would be some that involve some grip/hand/wrist strength. Same goes for any back issues.

I would also add that it seems like the Flames aren’t as concerned about skating as they are other attributes. Monahan and Tkachuck being two prime examples. On the topic of Tkachuck, I’d bet the Canucks passed on him due in large part to skating.

Last edited by TOfan; 03-31-2024 at 07:59 AM.
TOfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2024, 08:40 AM   #136
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bourque's Twin View Post
The Flames look like they’ll be drafting 8-10. I think the players almost guaranteed to be chosen by that spot are Celebrini, Demidov, Levshunov, Dickenson, Catton and Parekh. If any of those guys slide, you have to grab him.

Lindstrom could slide because of injuries.
Silayev could slide because he may have a lesser likelihood of reaching his ceiling.
Eiserman could slide because he’s 1 dimensional.

The Flames will have a choice of whoever slides or Buium, Iginla, Yakemchuk, and Helenius.

I think they should just take Iginla unless one from the top tier lands in their spot.
I think that's optimistic, and setting ourselves up for disappointment. I think they will be drafting 10-12. If it's any better than that, great!
Enoch Root is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2024, 08:42 AM   #137
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TOfan View Post
If it’s true that Lindstrom is dealing with some ailment of one kind or another, his performance at the combine should be interesting. I don’t know what all the exercises are, but I assume there would be some that involve some grip/hand/wrist strength. Same goes for any back issues.

I would also add that it seems like the Flames aren’t as concerned about skating as they are other attributes. Monahan and Tkachuck being two prime examples. On the topic of Tkachuck, I’d bet the Canucks passed on him due in large part to skating.
IIRC, the Canucks were pretty set on taking a defenseman, it was just a guess as to which one they were going to grab.
Enoch Root is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Enoch Root For This Useful Post:
Old 03-31-2024, 08:55 AM   #138
Tkachukwagon
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Tkachukwagon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Exp:
Default

I have a feeling Montreal takes Iginla at #5
Tkachukwagon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2024, 09:05 AM   #139
devo22
Franchise Player
 
devo22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Austria, NOT Australia
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TornBetween2Pucks View Post
I don't think he's been mentioned in this thread, but I hope we take Dickinson. He's a Pieterangelo clone. Maybe not the sexiest pick but St.Louis and Vegas fans will tell you that you win cups with guys like that.
outside of Lindstrom, this the guy I'd want too ... just everything about him screams perennial top pairing defenseman. Like you said, not the sexiest pick, but that's a cornerstone player to build around nonetheless. But I'd be shocked if he made it out of the top 5.
devo22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2024, 09:17 AM   #140
Tbull8
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tkachukwagon View Post
I have a feeling Montreal takes Iginla at #5
I think they MAYBE go Iginla if Catton and Lindstrom are both gone
Tbull8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:51 PM.

Calgary Flames
2023-24




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021