Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-11-2016, 01:26 PM   #1
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default Vegas names: [Desert/Golden/Silver] Knights

http://sinbin.vegas/report-name-selected-one-three/

Quote:
According to a report from the world guru on logos and team names, Chris Creamer of Sportslogos.net, the Las Vegas NHL team will be named Nighthawks, Desert Hawks, or Red Hawks.

There are three names the team appears to be moving forward with: the Desert Hawks, the Red Hawks, and the Nighthawks. These names were all registered as several different domain names by Black Knight IP Holding Company, LLC, the company owned by Las Vegas hockey owner Bill Foley within the last few weeks. -Chris Creamer
9th
sureLoss is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to sureLoss For This Useful Post:
Old 08-11-2016, 01:27 PM   #2
GreenLantern2814
Franchise Player
 
GreenLantern2814's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default

Nighthawks is the best of the three.

Desert Hawks is lame.

Red Hawks is... I dunno.

Why does the NHL need two 'hawk' based teams? It's the Roughriders all over again.
GreenLantern2814 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to GreenLantern2814 For This Useful Post:
Old 08-11-2016, 01:27 PM   #3
DomeFoam
Scoring Winger
 
DomeFoam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Kelowna
Exp:
Default

Chicago wont be happy
DomeFoam is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to DomeFoam For This Useful Post:
Old 08-11-2016, 01:27 PM   #4
polak
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Exp:
Default

Why not just "hawks" if you're going to copy Chicago.
polak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2016, 01:29 PM   #5
underGRADFlame
Lives In Fear Of Labelling
 
underGRADFlame's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Exp:
Default

underGRADFlame is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to underGRADFlame For This Useful Post:
Old 08-11-2016, 01:30 PM   #6
Locke
Franchise Player
 
Locke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Income Tax Central
Exp:
Default

Aw...I dont like any of those. Nighthawks is probably the best.

If hawks were the deal-breaker I know what would have been better.

NSFW!
__________________
The Beatings Shall Continue Until Morale Improves!

This Post Has Been Distilled for the Eradication of Seemingly Incurable Sadness.

If you are flammable and have legs, you are never blocking a Fire Exit. - Mitch Hedberg
Locke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2016, 01:31 PM   #7
SportsJunky
Uncle Chester
 
SportsJunky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Exp:
Default

I thought the talk was it was going to be Knights? I don't like these three new ones.
SportsJunky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2016, 01:32 PM   #8
Coach
Franchise Player
 
Coach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

Booooo.
__________________
Coach is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2016, 01:33 PM   #9
Hockeyguy15
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Exp:
Default

Hockeyguy15 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Hockeyguy15 For This Useful Post:
Old 08-11-2016, 01:34 PM   #10
drewtastic
First Line Centre
 
drewtastic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: So Long, Bannatyne
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GreenLantern2814 View Post
Nighthawks is the best of the three.

Desert Hawks is lame.

Red Hawks is... I dunno.

Why does the NHL need two 'hawk' based teams? It's the Roughriders all over again.
Except in the CFL that was awesome.

(Incidentally, it was "Roughriders" and "Rough Riders"--two completely different things )
drewtastic is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to drewtastic For This Useful Post:
Old 08-11-2016, 01:34 PM   #11
underGRADFlame
Lives In Fear Of Labelling
 
underGRADFlame's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Exp:
Default

Maybe the Las Vegas Lockheed Martin Desert Hawks?

Spoiler!
underGRADFlame is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2016, 01:34 PM   #12
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SportsJunky View Post
I thought the talk was it was going to be Knights? I don't like these three new ones.
It won't be the Knights because of trademark issues.

Specifically the London Knights trademark in Canada would prevent the name from being used and Foley said that it wasn't economical to obtain the rights (in other words the London Knights wanted a sh*t ton of money for it)
sureLoss is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to sureLoss For This Useful Post:
Old 08-11-2016, 01:36 PM   #13
GreenLantern2814
Franchise Player
 
GreenLantern2814's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by drewtastic View Post
Except in the CFL that was awesome.

(Incidentally, it was "Roughriders" and "Rough Riders"--two completely different things )
I think that's why Red Hawks is two words.

And come to think of it, the operative part of "Nighthawks" could be viewed as a synonym for Blackhawks.

#### this.
GreenLantern2814 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to GreenLantern2814 For This Useful Post:
Old 08-11-2016, 01:36 PM   #14
Cecil Terwilliger
That Crazy Guy at the Bus Stop
 
Cecil Terwilliger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Springfield Penitentiary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by polak View Post
Why not just "hawks" if you're going to copy Chicago.
pfft.

Clearly they are ripping off Nipawin.

I mean, look at these beauties...

Cecil Terwilliger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2016, 01:37 PM   #15
zyzz
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: YYC
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss View Post
It won't be the Knights because of trademark issues.

Specifically the London Knights trademark in Canada would prevent the name from being used and Foley said that it wasn't economical to obtain the rights (in other words the London Knights wanted a sh*t ton of money for it)
Why not just do something like this?

zyzz is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to zyzz For This Useful Post:
Old 08-11-2016, 01:38 PM   #16
Hatter
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Hatter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

I know the NHL is concerned about the gambling connotations, but Las Vegas Aces is by far the best name. Bluebirds would also be acceptable.
Hatter is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Hatter For This Useful Post:
Old 08-11-2016, 01:38 PM   #17
Phaneufenstein
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Jah Chalgary
Exp:
Default

This is ridiculous....
Can they not pick another animal or a bird that hasn't already been used in the same freaking league?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Champion View Post
The Oilers don't need a Giordano. They have a glut of him.
Phaneufenstein is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2016, 01:39 PM   #18
GreenLantern2814
Franchise Player
 
GreenLantern2814's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss View Post
It won't be the Knights because of trademark issues.

Specifically the London Knights trademark in Canada would prevent the name from being used and Foley said that it wasn't economical to obtain the rights (in other words the London Knights wanted a sh*t ton of money for it)
Yet it's cheaper to knock off the Chicago Blackhawks.
GreenLantern2814 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2016, 01:39 PM   #19
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SportsJunky View Post
I thought the talk was it was going to be Knights? I don't like these three new ones.
It was Black Knights (because of the Army connection) but I think that Army had an issue with that. Dunno why they couldn't just go "Knights" - I liked the double meaning. Maybe they didn't.
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to GioforPM For This Useful Post:
Old 08-11-2016, 01:40 PM   #20
Cecil Terwilliger
That Crazy Guy at the Bus Stop
 
Cecil Terwilliger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Springfield Penitentiary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Phaneufenstein View Post
This is ridiculous....
Can they not pick another animal or a bird that hasn't already been used in the same freaking league?
There aren't many left that also make sense for the team and region they are from.
Cecil Terwilliger is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:22 AM.

Calgary Flames
2023-24




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021