Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-22-2017, 12:59 PM   #21
Cantrader
Crash and Bang Winger
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Exp:
Default

Hope we are not dangling Bennett for Harmonic...
Cantrader is offline  
Old 06-22-2017, 01:00 PM   #22
AC
Resident Videologist
 
AC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason14h View Post
Is he worth the kind of rumored assets NYI want? Heck no
Which are?
I haven't seen anything mentioned.
AC is offline  
Old 06-22-2017, 01:01 PM   #23
SuperMatt18
Franchise Player
 
SuperMatt18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

I feel like we should just go after Demers and take the full cap hit off Florida's hands.

Probably comes a lot cheaper.
SuperMatt18 is offline  
Old 06-22-2017, 01:01 PM   #24
Roof-Daddy
Franchise Player
 
Roof-Daddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cantrader View Post
Hope we are not dangling Bennett for Harmonic...
Zero chance IMO
Roof-Daddy is offline  
Old 06-22-2017, 01:01 PM   #25
Flames Draft Watcher
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason14h View Post
Harmonic is quickly becoming the most overated D in the league.

I actually wonder how many people have ever watched him play!

Is he above average? Sure. Would he be great as a 4th D? Sure. Is he worth the kind of rumored assets NYI want? Heck no
Top 4 dmen are worth boatloads in trade. Especially when they are signed for reasonable prices.

Dmen in general are worth a ton in trades. Look at every trade deadline.

You'd have to think Treliving won't give up more for Hamonic than he gave up for Hamilton.
Flames Draft Watcher is offline  
Old 06-22-2017, 01:03 PM   #26
Sylvanfan
Appealing my suspension
 
Sylvanfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Just outside Enemy Lines
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flames Draft Watcher View Post
Like I said in the trade rumours thread, adding Methot/Hamonic and Stone would give us one of the best defences in the league. Don't know exactly how feasible it is. But I do like the names being mentioned. Ideally we'd add two #4 defensemen who are more the physical, defensive defensemen types. That allows us to work in an Andersson or Kulak as the 6th dman and have a nice balance of puck moving, skating, physicality, strength, etc.
These so called `Super' defense units with too many top 3-4 guys seldom seem to work out.

Nashville works well because they have a clearly established top 4, and a third pair that they can play for 12 minutes a night. Tying to shuffle 5 guys for top 4 ice time just seems to result in a unit that lacks cohesiveness.

Really I thought Stone was a nice addition last year because him and Brodie did play well together and the Flames had a top 4 they could put out for 48 minutes a night. The players all seemed to know what their role was, and were able to play that role.

I think you want to have that top 4, and emerging guys on the bottom pair who can take a bit more when injuries hit. But if you try to play an entire season with 5 top 4 guys...I think the unit as a whole doesn't seem to find it's stride.

So once they find a true number 4, I'd be looking to the bargain bin for another 5-6-7 guy come in and compete with the lower end depth.
__________________
"Some guys like old balls"
Patriots QB Tom Brady
Sylvanfan is offline  
Old 06-22-2017, 01:03 PM   #27
DallasFlamesFan
Draft Pick
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Default

I'm not sure that Hamonic will be good value right now and I'm just as happy signing Stone and going after a top 6RW. With that said, he could be a nice addition if he could be had for something around 1st + Wotherspoon/Poirier/Klimchuk or possibly 1st + Kulak/Shinkaruk. Doesn't sound like those get it done though and we shouldn't be paying any more.
DallasFlamesFan is offline  
Old 06-22-2017, 01:04 PM   #28
getbak
Franchise Player
 
getbak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
getbak is online now  
Old 06-22-2017, 01:05 PM   #29
Erick Estrada
Franchise Player
 
Erick Estrada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
Exp:
Default

I would rather use the 16th pick on a skill player than use it in a package for one of these guys. Seems to be a little early in the rebuild to abandon the draft/develop process and trade first round picks especially for an older player like Methot.
Erick Estrada is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to Erick Estrada For This Useful Post:
Old 06-22-2017, 01:05 PM   #30
Roof-Daddy
Franchise Player
 
Roof-Daddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Exp:
Default

Giordano - Hamilton
TJ Brodie - Hamonic
Kylington - Stone

Pretty balanced D. A lot of cap into it with Stone signed at $3.5 or so but its deep, well balanced and 5 of them are 27 or under.
Roof-Daddy is offline  
Old 06-22-2017, 01:05 PM   #31
TheScorpion
First round-bust
 
TheScorpion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: speculating about AHL players
Exp:
Default

@Erick Estrada: Hamonic is 26...
__________________
"This has been TheScorpion's shtick for years. All these hot takes, clickbait nonsense just to feed his social media algorithms." –Tuco

TheScorpion is offline  
Old 06-22-2017, 01:06 PM   #32
Erick Estrada
Franchise Player
 
Erick Estrada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roof-Daddy View Post
Giordano - Hamilton
TJ Brodie - Hamonic
Kylington - Stone

Pretty balanced D. A lot of cap into it with Stone signed at $3.5 or so but its deep, well balanced and 5 of them are 27 or under.
I think there's at least two or maybe three defensemen ahead of Kylington in the organizational depth chart.
Erick Estrada is offline  
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Erick Estrada For This Useful Post:
Old 06-22-2017, 01:07 PM   #33
Erick Estrada
Franchise Player
 
Erick Estrada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheScorpion View Post
@Erick Estrada: Hamonic is 26...
@TheScorpion: Please re-read my post..... I realize Hamonic isn't old but I still don't like the team going for it this early.
Erick Estrada is offline  
Old 06-22-2017, 01:08 PM   #34
Roof-Daddy
Franchise Player
 
Roof-Daddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada View Post
I think there's at least two or maybe three defensemen ahead of Kylington in the organizational depth chart.
I would assume Andersson goes the other way in a Hamonic trade but yeah go ahead and put Kulak or Wotherspoon in place of Kylington as it IMO it would be those three battling for the 6 and 7 spots along with Bartkowsi.
Roof-Daddy is offline  
Old 06-22-2017, 01:09 PM   #35
Street Pharmacist
Franchise Player
 
Street Pharmacist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Salmon with Arms
Exp:
Default

Noooooooo on methotrexate pls
Street Pharmacist is offline  
Old 06-22-2017, 01:09 PM   #36
CaptainCrunch
Norm!
 
CaptainCrunch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Exp:
Default

__________________
My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;

Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!
CaptainCrunch is offline  
Old 06-22-2017, 01:13 PM   #37
devo22
Franchise Player
 
devo22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Austria, NOT Australia
Exp:
Default

Hamonic makes 3.87m until 2020. That's a pretty sweet deal for a legitimate top 4 defenseman in his mid 20s, I thought he'd make more. In terms of cap, the Flames could easily trade for Hamonic, re-sign Stone and take care of their RFAs.
devo22 is offline  
Old 06-22-2017, 01:15 PM   #38
Vinny01
Franchise Player
 
Vinny01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

I am certainly pro Hamonic. He replaces a lot of what Engellend did butnisnyounger and better. His contract is appealing as he does not even make $4M per. Trade for him and give Stone a 3 year deal the Flames blueline would be among the most formidable in the league for the next 3 years.

No to trading Bennett, Jankowski, Anderson, Parsons. I am okay with other prospects and picks being in the deal.

Do this and sign a decent winger in free agency like a Marleau for 2 years and the team is shaping up nicely.
Vinny01 is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to Vinny01 For This Useful Post:
Old 06-22-2017, 01:22 PM   #39
IgiTang
Self-Retired
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Exp:
Default

If Hamonic was acquired, there is a serious log jam for our D prospects, one would have to be going the other way.

I'll play the trade game

To NYI - 2017 1st, Kylington, Kulak

To YYC - Hamonic, 2018 2nd Rd pick
IgiTang is offline  
Old 06-22-2017, 01:23 PM   #40
djsFlames
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flames Draft Watcher View Post
Like I said in the trade rumours thread, adding Methot/Hamonic and Stone would give us one of the best defences in the league. Don't know exactly how feasible it is. But I do like the names being mentioned. Ideally we'd add two #4 defensemen who are more the physical, defensive defensemen types. That allows us to work in an Andersson or Kulak as the 6th dman and have a nice balance of puck moving, skating, physicality, strength, etc.
If they can pick up Methot/Hamonic and re-sign Stone then I think they should just roll with what they have at that point.

Would probably be too difficult to add a top RW with the money tied up on D and Stajan and Bouma contracts still on the books for a year, but the Flames offence with the current crop over the past 3 seasons has still been in the upper half of the league. So if you can really beef up the blue line, just go with the same forwards, add a Jankowski and see what Gaudreau, Monahan, Bennett and Tkachuk can do with another year of maturation.

I'd see a team similar to Nashville if they can really bolster the 4-6 positions on defence.
djsFlames is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to djsFlames For This Useful Post:
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:22 AM.

Calgary Flames
2023-24




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021