Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-27-2017, 02:41 PM   #81
Bourque's Twin
First Line Centre
 
Bourque's Twin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Section 120
Exp:
Default

If Jankowski is better than Bennett for the 3rd line C role, then the Flames are going to be in great shape. Bennett would have to move to the wing.

Gaudreau - Monahan - Ferland
Tkachuk - Backlund - Frolik
Bennett - Jankowski - Versteeg
Hathaway - Lazar - Brouwer
xStajan, F. Hamilton
Bourque's Twin is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Bourque's Twin For This Useful Post:
Old 07-27-2017, 03:28 PM   #82
Calgary4LIfe
Franchise Player
 
Calgary4LIfe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Exp:
Default

If Jankowski makes the squad, that 4th line will be interesting to watch as it shapes.

Lazar, Stajan, Brouwer, Hathaway - a combination of those 3 players should really help with depth scoring, and allows Gulutzan to roll 4 lines without much care.
Calgary4LIfe is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Calgary4LIfe For This Useful Post:
Old 07-27-2017, 03:36 PM   #83
Gaudfather
Franchise Player
 
Gaudfather's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Right behind you.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Calgary4LIfe View Post
If Jankowski makes the squad, that 4th line will be interesting to watch as it shapes.

Lazar, Stajan, Brouwer, Hathaway - a combination of those 3 players should really help with depth scoring, and allows Gulutzan to roll 4 lines without much care.
Having a fourth line that is so effective it is forcing GG to bump their minutes from the normal 10-11 mins per night, would be a great problem to have.
Gaudfather is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2017, 05:05 PM   #84
Flames Draft Watcher
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flash Walken View Post
What I like about Bennett and Brouwer with Janko is the ability to have them able to take draws on their respective strong sides. Takes a bit of the burden off Jankowski as a first-year in the faceoff circle. Lets him maybe cheat a bit knowing if he gets waived out the team can still win.

It's a small thing, but I also think Bennett and Brouwer are similar styled players in an offensive capacity. Lots of net front play, short passes and board work.
Jankowski was strong in face offs in college and I think held his own in the minors this year. He may actually be better than Bennett at the moment in that particular facet of the game.

Your description fits Tkachuk as well. In fact you could make a whole line of players of that style with Tkachuk-Bennett-Brouwer. I wouldn't be opposed to trying that line out in preseason as I think they could really mesh and create another threat line. The Flames will be really hard if not nearly impossible to shut down if we've got a triple threat of lines.

If Jankowski doesn't make the team I think

Gaudreau-Monahan-Ferland
Tkachuk-Bennett-Brouwer
Frolik-Backlund-Versteeg/Foo
Stajan-Lazar-Hathaway

Would give us an amazing set of top three lines (and the fourth line ain't too shabby either). Tkachuk-Bennett-Brouwer would be such a greasy, gritty but skilled line with powerforwards who can dish and finish. Tkachuk and Bennett's antics may help keep Brouwer fired up and involved as well

Last edited by Flames Draft Watcher; 07-27-2017 at 05:14 PM.
Flames Draft Watcher is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Flames Draft Watcher For This Useful Post:
Old 07-27-2017, 05:19 PM   #85
calgaryblood
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Hmmmmmmm
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Calgary4LIfe View Post
If Jankowski makes the squad, that 4th line will be interesting to watch as it shapes.

Lazar, Stajan, Brouwer, Hathaway - a combination of those 3 players should really help with depth scoring, and allows Gulutzan to roll 4 lines without much care.
Honest question, how would Lazar, Stajan and Hathaway help with depth scoring? Are they going to become different players? Brouwer I can see helping on the 4th line but that's not a foursome I'd consider even average at helping the depth scoring. You could probably put 4 random 4th liners in a blender and all combinations will be just as good or not better.
calgaryblood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2017, 05:29 PM   #86
Flames Draft Watcher
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by calgaryblood View Post
Honest question, how would Lazar, Stajan and Hathaway help with depth scoring? Are they going to become different players? Brouwer I can see helping on the 4th line but that's not a foursome I'd consider even average at helping the depth scoring. You could probably put 4 random 4th liners in a blender and all combinations will be just as good or not better.
Some would say Stajan and Lazar have the skill to be playing 3rd line on teams with thinner forward ranks. Therefore having them on our 4th line gives us a higher potential 4th line. Hathaway meanwhile has shown some scoring touch in the minors. Im a huge fan of his but think he's a prototypical 4th line grinder. I don't expect a lot of scoring out of him but you may get more than just some random 4th line plug that we've had in years past. Overall I'd say Stajan-Lazar-Hathaway would definitely be an above average 4th line league wide. Therefore they help with depth scoring.
Flames Draft Watcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2017, 05:57 PM   #87
calgaryblood
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Hmmmmmmm
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flames Draft Watcher View Post
Some would say Stajan and Lazar have the skill to be playing 3rd line on teams with thinner forward ranks. Therefore having them on our 4th line gives us a higher potential 4th line. Hathaway meanwhile has shown some scoring touch in the minors. Im a huge fan of his but think he's a prototypical 4th line grinder. I don't expect a lot of scoring out of him but you may get more than just some random 4th line plug that we've had in years past. Overall I'd say Stajan-Lazar-Hathaway would definitely be an above average 4th line league wide. Therefore they help with depth scoring.

Two guys who couldn't crack the NHL last season (albeit Hathaway deserved to be an NHLer) make up 2/3 of an above average 4th line? lazar definitely hasn't proven a single thing and Stajan while being a good team guy isn't much of a scorer.

Lazar is a 4th line plug until he proves he isn't. He could very well be one of the 4th line plugs you allude to in a few years.
calgaryblood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2017, 07:02 PM   #88
Bourque's Twin
First Line Centre
 
Bourque's Twin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Section 120
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by calgaryblood View Post
Two guys who couldn't crack the NHL last season (albeit Hathaway deserved to be an NHLer) make up 2/3 of an above average 4th line? lazar definitely hasn't proven a single thing and Stajan while being a good team guy isn't much of a scorer.

Lazar is a 4th line plug until he proves he isn't. He could very well be one of the 4th line plugs you allude to in a few years.
Lazar is not a 4th line plug.

He had 20 points in 76 games in his sophomore season.

Bennett had 26 points in 81 games in his sophomore season.

Is Bennett a 4th line plug as well?
Bourque's Twin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2017, 07:48 PM   #89
Macindoc
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bourque's Twin View Post
Lazar is not a 4th line plug.

He had 20 points in 76 games in his sophomore season.

Bennett had 26 points in 81 games in his sophomore season.

Is Bennett a 4th line plug as well?
I would say that Stajan's 23 points make him more than a 4th line plug, as well, particularly since those points came on 4th line minutes. He could be a 3rd line C on many NHL teams. I would agree that we will have among the best 2nd-4th lines in the league.
Macindoc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2017, 11:04 PM   #90
Flames Draft Watcher
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by calgaryblood View Post
Two guys who couldn't crack the NHL last season (albeit Hathaway deserved to be an NHLer) make up 2/3 of an above average 4th line? lazar definitely hasn't proven a single thing and Stajan while being a good team guy isn't much of a scorer.

Lazar is a 4th line plug until he proves he isn't. He could very well be one of the 4th line plugs you allude to in a few years.
Lazar had mono last season, it was mostly a write-off. Can't really judge him based on that. Look at his scouting report when he was drafted IMO.

Here's Redline Report's scouting report on from 2003
"22. Curtis Lazar - C
Playing on deep championship club has allowed him to focus on play away from the puck, working toward a more complete game. Great first step explosion and has the speed to turn the corner on defenders using great puck protection. Has a clean, powerful stride and his strength on skates is a major asset - never gets knocked off the puck. Highly agile with great edging. Constantly involved in the physical aspect of the game and can dominate play down low. Determined and relentless in puck pursuit, creating space and opportunities for linemates. Crashes the net with intensity and hunger. Gets great torque on powerful shot. Tends to get tunnel vision with the puck in tight. Already plays a no-nonsense pro style — keeps things simple and avoids mental lapses. Big game player can elevate his level
Projection: Two-way 2nd line pivot on a good club.
Style compares to: Ryan O’Reilly"

Here's ISS's
12. CURTIS LAZAR
Position: C

Report Card
Size/Strength - Average
Skating - Very Good
Puck Skills - Very Good
Shot - Excellent
Offensive Play - Very Good
Defensive Play - Very Good
Physical Play - Good
Competitiveness - Very Good
Hockey Sense - Very Good

Strengths
1. Laser release on shot
2. Very good work ethic
3. Shows up when needed most

Weaknesses:
1. Needs to get stronger
2. Needs to put up more consistent offensive numbers

Skill: Very good two-way player with good fire in his game and good offensive capabilities.

Scouting Report:
It’s been an up and down season for Lazar in terms of his prospect status. He can be simply dominant and the best player on the ice at times, but he can also fall into long lapses where the offensive potential is nowhere to be found. Even so, he is consistently an effective player, who plays with good determination and high skill. He can grind with players much larger than himself, has very good smooth hands and can shoot the lights out from almost anywhere on the ice. He’s not the biggest kid, but he plays without fear or trepidation. The big knock so far has been in high exposure events (such as CHL TP game and Canada U18 evaluation camp) he has looked very average.
NHL Potential: 2nd/3rd line player with PP potential, could evolve into top line sniper."

Here's FC's
"No. 17
CURTIS LAZAR
POSITION: Centre
STRENGTHS: Lazar is a defensively strong forward with good speed and goal scoring ability. He possesses good quickness out the gate, has good mobility and turning ability, even at top speed. He’s a dynamic skater who has powerful legs and pretty solid acceleration. Lazar uses a wide balanced stance when protecting the puck and is hard to knock off stride and while he won’t blow the doors off of anyone, is tough to knock off the puck. He gets himself in good position to shoot, finding holes offensively, where he can unleash both a hard wrist or slap shot. He also has a very quick backhand in his shooting arsenal as well as a deadly one-timer. Is a killer from the slot-in with his great release and knows when, where and how to put pucks on net. Lazar isn’t afraid to deke to finish off plays from in close, either. He’s not just a shooter as his puck distribution and vision are superb and makes some excellent passes including quick cross-crease dishes on the backhand in tight to the net, multi-zone stretch passes from his own zone and soft saucer passes to streaking linemates. His passes have good velocity and are usually right on the tape. While he does have pretty good hands, he is not a real flashy puck dangling forward who will try to go end-to-end much if at all. He’s gritty, plays very physical when the situation calls for it and is versatile in that he can play on a skilled line as well as on a line with two very big and physical players. He bangs and crashes regularly along the walls, takes hits to make plays and shows the leadership and smarts that is rare for a player this age. He’s a true hockey player and a leader. He’ll be a glue guy in the NHL and a good guy in the room as a heart and soul player. He shows great inner drive, is a hard worker and displays great character, serving as an assistant captain as a 17-year-old on a veteran team. He will one day do that at the NHL level. Lazar plays with high energy and good intensity each and every shift. He has his head on a swivel each and every shift and his positioning in his own zone and in the neutral zone is fantastic. He is very good at reading the play and taking away lanes with his body and stick. Lazar will be one of the safest bets to make the Show out of this draft class as he is almost a guarantee to make an impression in one way or another.
WEAKNESSES: Lazar is a total defensive first player who does not take risks in the name of offense or to generating a scoring chance. While that is not necessarily a bad thing, it does reflect in his offensive numbers in junior and his perceived NHL offensive upside. He has not really shown much in the way of offensive creativity but instead just taking what he is given to produce opportunities. Is he a very good third line shutdown centre who can play your PK as well as add a little offense to your team or is he a great two-way second line center who can do it all and boost his offensive contributions?
SCOUTS QUOTE: “Some label Lazar as a great second or third liner, which tends to come with a negative stigma when people think first round talent. But, if by second or third liner, you mean a guy that can score 20-plus goals consistently, be a devastating weapon on the forecheck, and play well in all areas of the ice? Sure, I’ll take him in the first round any day of the week.”
NHL POTENTIAL: Top Nine Two-Way Forward"

So his upside when drafted was as a 2nd/3rd line centre. Sure he was rushed to the NHL and had mono last year but his skill didn't disappear off the planet. He may only project as a 3rd liner now but to call him a 4th line plug is pretty ignorant IMO. Perhaps you are not very informed on Lazar and reading too much into his early NHL seasons especially the year he had mono? Surely you must know that not all forwards have shown their complete offensive upside by his age. Look at one Mr. Backlund as proof of that. He wasn't even an NHL regular at Lazar's age now. Methinks you underrate his upside quite a bit. I'd suggest reading up on him a bit more and informing yourself.

Last edited by Flames Draft Watcher; 07-27-2017 at 11:44 PM.
Flames Draft Watcher is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Flames Draft Watcher For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:16 AM.

Calgary Flames
2023-24




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021