Shot Luck

[Yeah_Baby]

Would a shot luck part be less fun if their were strippers

[J pold]

Originally Posted by alltherage

I think that discussion would improve if people stopped trying to start fights rather than debates. See, I love to debate, but people never understand that and get into juvinile arguments instead.

Fair enough but it take two people to argue be it juvenile or otherwise.

[alltherage]

Originally Posted by J pold

Fair enough but it take two people to argue be it juvenile or otherwise.

Yeah, but I said instigate, not engage.

And Yeah Baby, you know, I'm coming around to the stripper thing. I think I was more pissed that they wouldn't do the party the way I wanted. I don't care anymore.

[FireFly]

Originally Posted by J pold

Fair enough but it take two people to argue be it juvenile or otherwise.

No it doesn't, poo-poo head.

[J pold]

Originally Posted by FireFly

No it doesn't, poo-poo head.

Stop quoting me or I'll get cooties.

[J pold]

Originally Posted by alltherage

Yeah, but I said instigate, not engage.

Come on now, you're going to tell me that you have never engaged in a juvinelle argument on Puck? I don't think one of theregular posters could make such a claim, expect Cowperson.

[alltherage]

Originally Posted by J pold

Come on now, you're going to tell me that you have never engaged in a juvinelle argument on Puck? I don't think one of theregular posters could make such a claim, expect Cowperson.

Oh of course I have. Mostly with you, actually. But it's usually because like I said, I like to debate. Usually these delinquent arguments come up because someone purposely ignores a point to make some funny comment or burn... but a part of my brain just doesn't want to skip my perfectly valid argument.

For example:

Me: I don't want strippers at my bachelor party. Is this party for me or for my friends?

You: Stop being a pansy and check out the titties.

That's not what I was asking. I want to have a conversation, not a flame war. The frustration comes from the fact that someone says some inflammatory comment and I want to get things back on track, so I throw my own little jab, try to "right the ship" if you will, but it usually doesn't work that way.

Now all of a sudden I'm defending my morals and my opinions against being a pansy or whipped or something... when in reality, what I really was asking is, should my wishes be respected at my bachelor party?

Then I start to realise that someone is just egging me on, trying to get a rise out of me, or how you so transparently put it "trying to get me banned" for your own entertainment. That's just dumb. I think your more likely to get yourself banned from that kind of thing.

Bottom line is, a lot of people are sick of this kind of posting. I know of about 4 or 5 people who honeslty do this for shats and giggles, when really the vast majority of us want healthy discussion, not flame wars.

If you want this place to be more like the Canucks forum, keep posting this way. I facking hate that board though.

[Bobblehead]

The old "I want to get back on topic and take the last shot" strategy? I'm not sure that is part of a "perfectly valid argument". Pretty tricky one to pull off.

If you want this place to be more like the Canucks forum, keep posting this way.

Ooohhhhh there it is; trying to get in a final shot.

It is obvious you are familiar with Canuck board practices; if they bother you so much you should just leave them on the canucks board.

[alltherage]

Originally Posted by Bobblehead

The old "I want to get back on topic and take the last shot" strategy? I'm not sure that is part of a "perfectly valid argument". Pretty tricky one to pull off.
Ooohhhhh there it is; trying to get in a final shot.

It is obvious you are familiar with Canuck board practices; if they bother you so much you should just leave them on the canucks board.

Thats not a shot at J pold, its a shot at people who post that way.

Also, I do think a shot for shot is pretty valid. If someone walks up to me and smacks me in the face, he's going to get it back.

[Bobblehead]

Originally Posted by alltherage

Thats not a shot at J pold, its a shot at people who post that way. Also, I do think a shot for shot is pretty valid.

Not if you are trying to get the thread back on topic.

If you want to go shot for shot then you may as well abandon the original topic. Even if you can do both you probably lose a lot of the people who would be interested in the debate.

Take the high road, ignore the shot, and if the person you are debating takes another shot they look like the ######.

[alltherage]

Originally Posted by Bobblehead

Not if you are trying to get the thread back on topic.

If you want to go shot for shot then you may as well abandon the original topic. Even if you can do both you probably lose a lot of the people who would be interested in the debate.

Take the high road, ignore the shot, and if the person you are debating takes another shot they look like the ######.

OK that's valid. I just feel like usually it's the same people over and over. It's something where I just want to shut them up, but I guess that's not really easy to do over teh interwebs.

[Esoteric]

Originally Posted by Bobblehead

ignore the shot

I thought the whole thread was about shots?

[Jordan!]

Who mixes shots like that?

[Clarkey]

Originally Posted by Reaper

I have never thrown a hissy fit in my life.

However we are all men, we know the consequences. If we touch someone without their permission then be prepared to fight. period.

I wouldn't try to avoid the "Buck Taffy". I'd simply beat the shat out of anyone who did it to me. A beatdown is a form of accountability for those brave enough to "Buck Taffy" me.

BTW, Buck Taffy is an idiotic term. The correct term is "he got chiefed." I made it clear to everyone I knew that if they were thinking of chiefing me that the consequences would be 100x worse than whatever they could think of.

What if the guy that did it could beat the shat out of you? Oh wait you're invincible.

[FireFly]

Originally Posted by J pold

Stop quoting me or I'll get cooties.

So you don't like girl cooties? Well you've got them now!

[alltherage]

Mmmm.... I'm going to drink wine tonight. I love wine. We should have a delicious wine thread.

[GreenTeaFrapp]

Originally Posted by alltherage

Mmmm.... I'm going to drink wine tonight. I love wine. We should have a delicious wine thread.

Malbec FTW

[alltherage]

Originally Posted by GreenTeaFrapp

Malbec FTW

PKNT is a really good chilean wine. Its a sweeter wine.. but no more so than a 1 or 2. It finishes smooth... sooooo good with red meats and pasta. Or just to drink.

I like the merlot personally.