Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-01-2013, 11:53 AM   #1
Dr. Doom
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Dr. Doom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Exp:
Thumbs down Calgary Flames: Clueless and Pointless (Damien Cox)

Nails it, from a city where they have a history of seeing similar crap:

http://thestar.blogs.com/thespin/201...pointless.html
Dr. Doom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2013, 11:56 AM   #2
dino7c
Franchise Player
 
dino7c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

Trying to get ROR is not going for it now...he is 22. That move alone is not an issue
dino7c is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to dino7c For This Useful Post:
Old 03-01-2013, 12:01 PM   #3
Flashpoint
Not the 1 millionth post winnar
 
Flashpoint's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Even worse, Sportsnet.ca is reporting that if the Flames had successfully landed O'Reilly, they likely never would have got him in uniform because he would have had to go on waivers first after playing in the KHL on Jan. 23rd.
Yikes.
__________________
"Isles give up 3 picks for 5.5 mil of cap space.

Oilers give up a pick and a player to take on 5.5 mil."
-Bax
Flashpoint is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2013, 12:02 PM   #4
TorqueDog
Franchise Player
 
TorqueDog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Calgary - Centre West
Exp:
Default

After watching Damien Cox on the TSN panel, I'm pretty sure the "Clueless and Pointless" bit refers to him.
__________________
-James
GO
FLAMES GO.
TorqueDog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2013, 12:02 PM   #5
FlameZilla
First Line Centre
 
FlameZilla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Exp:
Default

Feaster tried to get a centre again & failed again. Not really a huge deal.
FlameZilla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2013, 12:02 PM   #6
oldschoolcalgary
Franchise Player
 
oldschoolcalgary's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Exp:
Default

anyone that thinks a 50 pt two way center should be compensated at 6.5 million dollars is insane.

another bullet dodged by Feaster, but its pretty clear he going to do something stupid and cripple this franchise further...
oldschoolcalgary is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to oldschoolcalgary For This Useful Post:
Old 03-01-2013, 12:03 PM   #7
zukes
Nostradamus
 
zukes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: London Ont.
Exp:
Default

Ugh, please don't use Cox as support for anything. That guy doesn't have an opinion, just tries to generate page hits by spinning a story to aggravate people. The name of his little blog there is called, "The Spin" FFS.
__________________
agggghhhhhh!!!
zukes is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to zukes For This Useful Post:
Old 03-01-2013, 12:04 PM   #8
Tinordi
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Exp:
Default

Sad and depressing. The worst is that you're powerless to affect change. You can only watch these clowns dance around the bonfire.
Tinordi is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Tinordi For This Useful Post:
Old 03-01-2013, 12:07 PM   #9
Mightyfire89
And I Don't Care...
 
Mightyfire89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: The land of the eternally hopeful
Exp:
Default

Like him or not, there's not much wrong with what he stated in that article.

This organization is gong show city right now.
__________________
Mightyfire89 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Mightyfire89 For This Useful Post:
Old 03-01-2013, 12:08 PM   #10
polak
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Exp:
Default

Surely this much hysteria and riddicule is too much for the ownership to ignore?
polak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2013, 12:10 PM   #11
Five-hole
Franchise Player
 
Five-hole's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: The C-spot
Exp:
Default

What a terrible article.

First, he argues the Flames need to step back and rebuild, insinuating that we should capitalize on a high draft pick. Then he criticizes the team for bolstering a division rival. Which is it, Cox?

Next he talks about setting the price for an RFA center at $6.5 million. That's not how it works. Is the price for RFA defencemen $12 million thanks to Tyler Myers? No, it's set by the cap average of the contract, you dummy. Thirdly, does anyone use offer sheet totals as arbitration figures or comparables? Highly unlikely. Everybody knows its a distortion of value.

I don't disagree with the general premise -- that the organization is perhaps deluding itself at present -- but his points are just wrong or contradictory.
Five-hole is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2013, 12:11 PM   #12
Stampede2TheCup
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Stampede2TheCup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: lower mainland
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dino7c View Post
Trying to get ROR is not going for it now...he is 22. That move alone is not an issue
I also think the Cammalleri move isn't all about short term as he argues. He misconstrues it by describing it without Bourque or Ramo involved. There's enough evidence to support his point otherwise so it seems pretty dumb to be trying to stretch the truth just to go further.
Stampede2TheCup is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2013, 12:13 PM   #13
Flash Walken
Lifetime Suspension
 
Flash Walken's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: The Void between Darkness and Light
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tinordi View Post
Sad and depressing. The worst is that you're powerless to affect change. You can only watch these clowns dance around the bonfire.
That's the worst part for me.

I'm not a hockey genius, but I'm seeing it happen in slow motion.
Flash Walken is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2013, 12:39 PM   #14
oldschoolcalgary
Franchise Player
 
oldschoolcalgary's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Five-hole View Post
What a terrible article.

First, he argues the Flames need to step back and rebuild, insinuating that we should capitalize on a high draft pick. Then he criticizes the team for bolstering a division rival. Which is it, Cox?

Next he talks about setting the price for an RFA center at $6.5 million. That's not how it works. Is the price for RFA defencemen $12 million thanks to Tyler Myers? No, it's set by the cap average of the contract, you dummy. Thirdly, does anyone use offer sheet totals as arbitration figures or comparables? Highly unlikely. Everybody knows its a distortion of value.

I don't disagree with the general premise -- that the organization is perhaps deluding itself at present -- but his points are just wrong or contradictory.
the point was setting the market for a 50 pt two way centerman (with one good year under his belt) at 6.5 million. That's the number he'll be qualified at.
oldschoolcalgary is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2013, 12:42 PM   #15
Five-hole
Franchise Player
 
Five-hole's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: The C-spot
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by oldschoolcalgary View Post
the point was setting the market for a 50 pt two way centerman (with one good year under his belt) at 6.5 million. That's the number he'll be qualified at.
Still doesn't matter what he's qualified at, even if he accepts the QO. The "market being set" is not some mathematical rule that people have to follow in negotiations.
Five-hole is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2013, 12:56 PM   #16
oldschoolcalgary
Franchise Player
 
oldschoolcalgary's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Five-hole View Post
Still doesn't matter what he's qualified at, even if he accepts the QO. The "market being set" is not some mathematical rule that people have to follow in negotiations.
Not often you see agents going for less money unless its a hometown discount or a ridiculously long contract term though.

No one is obligated to follow any precedent set in other player negotiations. But they do.
oldschoolcalgary is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2013, 01:00 PM   #17
Cali Panthers Fan
Franchise Player
 
Cali Panthers Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Boca Raton, FL
Exp:
Default

Damien Cox writes for the Star...

'nuff said.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by ResAlien View Post
If we can't fall in love with replaceable bottom 6 players then the terrorists have won.
Cali Panthers Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Cali Panthers Fan For This Useful Post:
Old 03-01-2013, 02:06 PM   #18
Split98
Franchise Player
 
Split98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Ontario
Exp:
Default

I'd still do that Cammalleri trade over and over again. Was an absolutely fantastic trade that we won without question.

Cammalleri back? Check
Cammalleri still has years left and is incredibly talented? Check
Cammalleri is fantastic in the locker room we hope to fill with young talent? Check
Bourque is gone? Check
We have a goalie prospect to potentially replace Kipper? Check

What'd we lose to return all this? Patrick Holland (5G 11A 51GP in the A) and a 2nd (we did also gain a 5th)

IMO... still a fleecing.

I also agree with above. There is no way ROR is a 'win now' player. He's an asset that can contribute immediately and fits right in with the age group we are hoping to attain moving forward. He would have been a long-term pivot (if he ever made it here).

I also don't agree that our 1st is in play. Clearly Feaster saw ROR as a better player than what we'd pick with our (currently) 5th overall. Debatable for sure (I don't agree) but that was his valuation. I definitely don't see this as a sign that he's set to mortgage our future to win now.

Last edited by Split98; 03-01-2013 at 02:11 PM.
Split98 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Split98 For This Useful Post:
Old 03-01-2013, 02:13 PM   #19
madmike
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Exp:
Default

I don't love Cox, but where is he wrong? I'll give Feaster some credit for drafting decently, but this O'Reilly move is absurd.

Let's face it - if the deal had gone through and O'Reilly had hit waivers, Feaster would already be gone.
madmike is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to madmike For This Useful Post:
Old 03-01-2013, 02:17 PM   #20
CliffFletcher
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2006
Exp:
Default

Damien Cox is a dolt. However, his assessment of the Flames is on target.
CliffFletcher is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to CliffFletcher For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:41 AM.

Calgary Flames
2023-24




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021