06-18-2017, 09:19 AM
|
#81
|
Scoring Winger
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: A glass case of emotion
|
Pitts choosing to go 8 + 1 to protect Shultz who is a UFA. Leaves Rust exposed.
|
|
|
06-18-2017, 09:20 AM
|
#83
|
Franchise Player
|
definitely some solid players available for Vegas to pick when you add in some of the surprise names, it seems like they should be able to field a competitive team...luckily teams can only lose 1 guy...
there's definitely a number of guys i wish Calgary was in on in those lists...
|
|
|
06-18-2017, 09:21 AM
|
#84
|
Franchise Player
|
Prediction on how many 1st round picks Vegas will have? I say that will end up with 5. I think the rumors already have them with 3?
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Geeoff For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-18-2017, 09:24 AM
|
#85
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Geeoff
Prediction on how many 1st round picks Vegas will have? I say that will end up with 5. I think the rumors already have them with 3?
|
I will say 6.
|
|
|
06-18-2017, 09:26 AM
|
#86
|
In the Sin Bin
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jaydub74
There are definitely some good players being left exposed, I'm surprised LV is so willing to make side deals to Not take player x from these rosters. Rumours out there have LV collecting a lot of 1st round picks in exchange for not taking these players, but why? The player LV drafts is essentially a lotto ticket, when some of these players are sure things... I don't really understand. I would be more inclined to take the player (especially if they have term) rather than take a mid to high first round pick in exchange.
That said, perhaps they're looking to compile picks and move up the draft, but that only gets them one player. Its not like the top picks are generational or anything..
|
If you're building a team from scratch what's the most important thing you need for the long term? Young players, picks and prospects. You wanna build the young foundation of your team.
Don't understand why you'd think they'd rather have players now. The most important assets to a new team are young players, prospects and picks. They're smart to accumulate 1st rounders.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Flames Draft Watcher For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-18-2017, 09:26 AM
|
#87
|
In the Sin Bin
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by devo22
they'd be mad not to. Look at Columbus, they gave them a 1st and LV is still walking away with Murray. From an asset point of view, it's a no-brainer to make a few of those kind of deals.
|
Murray was protected it looks like
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Flames Draft Watcher For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-18-2017, 09:27 AM
|
#88
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Calgary
|
Did I read right that Arizona protected Johnson and exposed Domingue?... What was the point of getting a free agent Johnson in the Smith trade?... Basically gives Johnson zero value in the trade (I had assumed the whole reason he was included was so they didn't have to expose Domingue)
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Icon For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-18-2017, 09:28 AM
|
#89
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Par
Totally agree with you, , if Vegas is told by the Ducks not to Vatanen and Manson, than Vegas is getting a massive return.
On a side note with Fleury, Mrazek, Raanta and Grubauer all available, Vegas has better goaltending and goaltending depth than the Calgary Flames
|
Not necessarily.
First of all, Vegas can't afford to keep all those goalies - they may pick them and then trade them, but they can't hold 4 NHL goalies into the season. And they can't send any of them to the AHL because they wouldn't clear waivers.
Second, they still have no goalie prospects.
Right now (and assuming they sign Johnson, or an equivalent backup), the Flames' goaltending depth is:
Smith
Johnson
Gillies
Rittich
Parsons (maybe the best goalie prospect on the planet)
MacDonald
They will have Gillies and (likely) Rittich playing in the AHL, and they will (likely) have Parsons playing in the ECHL.
Vegas has nothing like that, and won't for at least 3 years.
Unless... they trade a couple of the guys you listed for prospects. How about a post expansion trade of Grubrauer for Gillies - would both teams do that? Vegas will need some prospects for their organizational depth.
|
|
|
06-18-2017, 09:28 AM
|
#90
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Indiana
|
It's funny how none of the 7 Canadian teams really exposed any good players.
|
|
|
06-18-2017, 09:29 AM
|
#91
|
Scoring Winger
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: A glass case of emotion
|
I think a lot of people thought that. PHX is obviously up to something with Vegas and a goalie.
|
|
|
06-18-2017, 09:30 AM
|
#92
|
In the Sin Bin
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Icon
Did I read right that Arizona protected Johnson and exposed Domingue?... What was the point of getting a free agent Johnson in the Smith trade?... Basically gives Johnson zero value in the trade (I had assumed the whole reason he was included was so they didn't have to expose Domingue)
|
Johnson was included because they had to protect a goalie just like they had to expose one. After the Smith trade they had no goalie to protect. Johnson was included so they could protect him and meet the protection/exposure rules. Domingue was always being exposed by them because he was the goalie that met the exposure requirements. Johnson could not meet the exposure requirements as he is not under contract.
Yes Johnson did basically have zero value in the trade, he's UFA
Last edited by Flames Draft Watcher; 06-18-2017 at 09:33 AM.
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Flames Draft Watcher For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-18-2017, 09:30 AM
|
#93
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Peterborough, ON
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Icon
Did I read right that Arizona protected Johnson and exposed Domingue?... What was the point of getting a free agent Johnson in the Smith trade?... Basically gives Johnson zero value in the trade (I had assumed the whole reason he was included was so they didn't have to expose Domingue)
|
They needed a goaltender that met the requirements to be protected I believe.
|
|
|
06-18-2017, 09:30 AM
|
#94
|
Some kinda newsbreaker!
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Icon
Did I read right that Arizona protected Johnson and exposed Domingue?... What was the point of getting a free agent Johnson in the Smith trade?... Basically gives Johnson zero value in the trade (I had assumed the whole reason he was included was so they didn't have to expose Domingue)
|
They had to get Johnson because by the expansion draft rules they NEED to have 1 goalie to protect AND 1 goalie to expose. If they didn't get Johnson, they only had 1 goalie (Dominigue) in the organization that could fill either spot.
Since Johnson was not signed to a contract he had to be used in the protection slot, he could not be used in the exposed slot. Dominigue was likely going to get exposed anyways if Smith had stayed.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to sureLoss For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-18-2017, 09:31 AM
|
#95
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: F*** me. We're so f***ing good, you check the f***ing standings? Lets f***ing go! F***ing practice!
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hey Connor, It's Mess
Mrazek left unprotected...? That's a bit of a headscratcher.
|
I've watched a lot of Wings games over the last two seasons and Mrazek has really been left to his own devices in the majority of his starts. Detroit's defense has been horrible.
That said, Jimmy Howard really did have an amazing season behind the same team, although he only played 26 games.
Although it seems unlikely with the Smith trade, if the Flames could somehow acquire Petr Mrazek out of all this I would do freaking cartwheels.
__________________
Backlund for Selke 2017 2018
Oilers suck.
|
|
|
06-18-2017, 09:31 AM
|
#96
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Geeoff
Prediction on how many 1st round picks Vegas will have? I say that will end up with 5. I think the rumors already have them with 3?
|
4...
i don't know... reviewing those lists, it sure seems like there are guys that are better and in the NHL currently than taking a draft pick, esp in this year's draft...
like the NYI for example, where there is a rumored deal... does that pick (15th overall?) prevent them from picking Nelson or deHaan? (Edit - the rumor says prevents them from choosing a fwd). because, personally, i think either will be better than the guy at 15...or at least there's some certainty of getting a very good player...
i don't know whether i'd take lottery tickets over young, solid, NHL players if i were vegas
Last edited by oldschoolcalgary; 06-18-2017 at 09:42 AM.
|
|
|
06-18-2017, 09:31 AM
|
#97
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada
It appears they may end up icing a better team than the Canucks.
|
It's actually looking like Vegas may be better than both the canucks and the yotes.
Looking at the available players, i wouldn't be shocked if they finish ahead of both those teams in the standings next year.
|
|
|
06-18-2017, 09:32 AM
|
#98
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1qqaaz
It's funny how none of the 7 Canadian teams really exposed any good players.
|
Ottawa exposed Marc Methot.
|
|
|
06-18-2017, 09:33 AM
|
#99
|
Retired
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Back in Guelph
|
Nm
|
|
|
06-18-2017, 09:33 AM
|
#100
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hey Connor, It's Mess
Mrazek left unprotected...? That's a bit of a headscratcher.
|
Sub .900 sv% for a season and a half now.
Not as surprising when you consider that.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:31 PM.
|
|