Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-25-2017, 03:50 PM   #121
jayswin
Celebrated Square Root Day
 
jayswin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Marleau would be a neat add. Not sure how much he's got left in the tank but I'm sure he'd contribute a decent season.
jayswin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2017, 03:53 PM   #122
Gaudfather
Franchise Player
 
Gaudfather's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Right behind you.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FlamesAddiction View Post
I could see the Flames interested in Bobby Ryan. Burke was pumping his tires not that long ago.

Of course, the Sens would need to take back a contract or retain some salary.
He must of learned how to spell "intense" and so now is in Burke's good books!
Gaudfather is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Gaudfather For This Useful Post:
Old 06-25-2017, 04:01 PM   #123
slcrocket
Backup Goalie
 
slcrocket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Lakebay, WA
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jayswin View Post
Bobby Ryan? Geez, that's really the kind of contract you want to avoid. Of course he would be a great compliment to our first line, but still, I'd only do it for Stajan and Bouma off our books. But then why would Ottawa do that?
We can just offer them all of our second round picks through 2027.
slcrocket is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2017, 04:24 PM   #124
Yanda
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Yanda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Exp:
Default

I would like to see Frolik back on the left Side with Brouwer and Backlund, I think that could really help Brouwer get better value while freeing up Tkachuk to play with Bennett and either a UFA RW or Versteeg in a chippy Finesse style line.
Yanda is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Yanda For This Useful Post:
Old 06-25-2017, 04:30 PM   #125
FlamesAddiction
Franchise Player
 
FlamesAddiction's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jayswin View Post
Bobby Ryan? Geez, that's really the kind of contract you want to avoid. Of course he would be a great compliment to our first line, but still, I'd only do it for Stajan and Bouma off our books. But then why would Ottawa do that?
I could see Ottawa doing it because Ryan doesn't really fit on the top line there anymore. The contract is terrible, but more terrible for them than it would be for the Flames as they have RWers ahead of him on their depth chart. For us, he would be plugging a pretty big hole. Just to get rid of the contract would be a win for them.

He wouldn't be my first choice, but the acquisition cost would probably be low. But it would have to be contingent on them either keeping some salary or taking a bad contract back.
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."

Last edited by FlamesAddiction; 06-25-2017 at 04:39 PM.
FlamesAddiction is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2017, 04:34 PM   #126
TheScorpion
First round-bust
 
TheScorpion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: speculating about AHL players
Exp:
Default

I would take Ryan at 33% retained for Klimchuk, McDonald, Stajan, and Bouma.

But I'd rather acquire Cammalleri with some retained salary.
__________________
"This has been TheScorpion's shtick for years. All these hot takes, clickbait nonsense just to feed his social media algorithms." –Tuco

TheScorpion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2017, 05:16 PM   #127
Rick M.
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FlamesAddiction View Post
I could see Ottawa doing it because Ryan doesn't really fit on the top line there anymore. The contract is terrible, but more terrible for them than it would be for the Flames as they have RWers ahead of him on their depth chart. For us, he would be plugging a pretty big hole. Just to get rid of the contract would be a win for them.

He wouldn't be my first choice, but the acquisition cost would probably be low. But it would have to be contingent on them either keeping some salary or taking a bad contract back.
His last good season was 5 years ago. Pass.
Rick M. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2017, 05:21 PM   #128
dammage79
Franchise Player
 
dammage79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rick M. View Post
His last good season was 5 years ago. Pass.
That's not true. He was in pure beast mode for Ottawa in the playoffs this year. His impact on their run was full value of his contract. That alone IMO , is worth taking him on. We have the team to get him to the playoffs. If anything, I'd rank him 3rd on my wish list behind Kovalchuk and maybe Marleau
dammage79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2017, 06:10 PM   #129
Fire
Franchise Player
 
Fire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dammage79 View Post
That's not true. He was in pure beast mode for Ottawa in the playoffs this year. His impact on their run was full value of his contract. That alone IMO , is worth taking him on. We have the team to get him to the playoffs. If anything, I'd rank him 3rd on my wish list behind Kovalchuk and maybe Marleau
That's the type of contract that could kill the Flames chances of winning the Cup. 25 points in 62 games last season. His good playoffs doesn't make up for that.
__________________

Fire is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2017, 06:20 PM   #130
Roof-Daddy
Franchise Player
 
Roof-Daddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Exp:
Default

Does anybody really see Treliving making a big splash for a winger?

Could be wrong, but I sure don't.
Roof-Daddy is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Roof-Daddy For This Useful Post:
Old 06-25-2017, 06:34 PM   #131
Split98
Franchise Player
 
Split98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Ontario
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jayswin View Post
Bobby Ryan? Geez, that's really the kind of contract you want to avoid. Of course he would be a great compliment to our first line, but still, I'd only do it for Stajan and Bouma off our books. But then why would Ottawa do that?
I agree on Bobby having a contract you want to avoid. $7,250,000 is an enormous amount of money for what he's been producing lately.

But I wouldn't rule out guys like Stajan and Bouma being wants on other teams (not to say Ottawa is one of them). As much as I want to make room for guys like Hathaway, a good soldier like Stajan on the 4th is pretty invaluable.

If Ottawa retained a good chink of salary, I could see him being worth the gamble of a resurgence here.

Would be a deal full of retained salaries, conditional picks and a good prospect going their way though.
Split98 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2017, 06:40 PM   #132
Split98
Franchise Player
 
Split98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Ontario
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roof-Daddy View Post
Does anybody really see Treliving making a big splash for a winger?

Could be wrong, but I sure don't.
And unless Brouwer is going the other way, I hope he doesn't.

Ferland played very well there, and Johnny+Mony played very well with him on that line. It wasn't a short stint either -- 6 or so weeks is a long time to demonstrate this isn't just a fluke. If we called that our 2nd line, most around here should be pretty happy with how that was looking. We certainly have a very productive 1st line that doesn't get the moniker.

Brouwer (4,500,000) / Ferland (2,000,000?) / Frolik (4,300,000) is a decent chunk of change tied into RW already. Depending on Brouwer's rebound, the Johnny+Mony line will be an option for him. At the very least, he'll have an opportunity to prove himself as a good (albeit overpaid) 3rd liner with Bennett.

Hope he keeps his ears open for opportunities, but I'd hope he isn't going to just pile someone else on and logjam our forwards.
Split98 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2017, 06:41 PM   #133
FlamesAddiction
Franchise Player
 
FlamesAddiction's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fire View Post
That's the type of contract that could kill the Flames chances of winning the Cup. 25 points in 62 games last season. His good playoffs doesn't make up for that.
He was only 9th on his team for ice time among forwards last season - basically their version of Alex Chiasson. He was also only 5th for PP time among forwards.

If he was given 1st line ice time, I suspect he would produce a lot more again.
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."
FlamesAddiction is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2017, 06:47 PM   #134
Fire
Franchise Player
 
Fire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FlamesAddiction View Post
He was only 9th on his team for ice time among forwards last season - basically their version of Alex Chiasson. He was also only 5th for PP time among forwards.

If he was given 1st line ice time, I suspect he would produce a lot more again.
You have to question why he got so little ice time and if you would want to risk taking that contract for a 30+ year old player.
__________________

Fire is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2017, 06:54 PM   #135
DJones
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Exp:
Default

I'm happy with Ferland but I also want Ferland with Bennett. Getting that 3rd line going is key.

Tkachuk, Jankowski, Bennett, and Ferland.

Putting Brouwer with Backlund or Monahan would solve a lot of problems
DJones is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2017, 07:35 PM   #136
Vinny01
Franchise Player
 
Vinny01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roof-Daddy View Post
Does anybody really see Treliving making a big splash for a winger?

Could be wrong, but I sure don't.
I don't think Treliving is overly concerned about finding a top winger. From the sounds of it signing Mike Stone or another number 5 D is the next priority.

Here is the current lineup for next year.

Gaudreau-Monahan-Ferland(RFA)
Tkachuk-Backlund-Frolik
Lazar(RFA)-Bennett(RFA)-Brouwer
Bouma-Stajan-Chiasson(RFA)

With Versteeg(UFA), Jankowski, Hathaway, and any other prospect in the mix.

I think the Flames try and find room for Jankowski and it wouldn't shock me to see them shop Stajan for a late round pick. They could open up a couple more spots by burying Bouma and walking away from Chiasson. That way they could keep Versteeg and potentially get another top line winger (Marleau would be a great fit)
Vinny01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2017, 07:41 PM   #137
oldschoolcalgary
Franchise Player
 
oldschoolcalgary's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Exp:
Default

Bobby Ryan?

Well, I mean he has potential...but at 7.25/year?

Not only is that contract a lot to take on, but he suddenly jumps guys like Mony, Johnny and Gio...

I don't think that's a good idea to bring a guy on with that kind of contract based on what his production has been...and he immediately goes to the top of the food chain

Now if you can get them to take Brouwer on and eat some of that contract so it's less than the other guys on the team, it might be possible...

Last edited by oldschoolcalgary; 06-25-2017 at 07:43 PM.
oldschoolcalgary is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2017, 07:58 PM   #138
Machiavelli
Franchise Player
 
Machiavelli's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Exp:
Default

Far too many years left on that Ryan contract, no thanks
__________________
KNOWLEDGE IS POWER. I love power.
Machiavelli is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Machiavelli For This Useful Post:
Old 06-25-2017, 08:25 PM   #139
IrishSpring2013
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Exp:
Default

bobby ryan...??
i certainly hope anyone who hates troy brouwer either before or after the signing isn't wanting to get this bum...

they both had 13 goals and 25 points last season.. and in the four seasons since Ryan joined the ducks brouwer has OUT SCORED ryan by one goal... 77 to 76..

i wouldnt do brouwer for ryan one-for-one in a deal.
IrishSpring2013 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2017, 08:50 PM   #140
Goriders
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Exp:
Default

Go get Jagr on a 1 year contract.

That would be awesome.

Monahan would score 70 goals between him and Johnny.
Goriders is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:50 AM.

Calgary Flames
2023-24




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021