Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-06-2017, 09:47 AM   #101
BloodFetish
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Coquitlam, BC
Exp:
Default

Adding California would be too much. I can see nibbling away slowly by adding Washington then letting a decade pass to work out the inevitable issues. Once that experience is gained and the merger is proved successful then if Oregon and/or Alaska wished to join it would be much easier.

IMO, of all the western states Washington is the jewel in the crown IF the major employers there (Boeing, Microsoft for example) don't pick up stakes and move.
BloodFetish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2017, 11:16 AM   #102
burn_baby_burn
Franchise Player
 
burn_baby_burn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Chiefs Kingdom, Yankees Universe, C of Red.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by driveway View Post
The question of whether a State can secede from the Union or not was settled in the 1860's.
The Republicans did squash the rebellion. However, Jefferson Davis was released from prison after two years and not charged with treason. The federal government wasn't confident that it would get a conviction and that it would legitimize the legality of the secessionist movement.

So militarily it was settled, but legally it wasn't. However, I don't think anyone wants to go through what the Confederate states went through.
__________________
burn_baby_burn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2017, 11:57 AM   #103
REDVAN
Franchise Player
 
REDVAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Thunderball View Post
He's right.

Once you open up the constitution to add new provinces, all bets are off. Things like Quebec's status within the nation, the grandfathering of rights and privileges to the Maritimes, equalization, bilingualism (or trilingualism as Spanish becomes #2 if California were to ever join), CPP, etc.... all of that comes up for discussion.

Does Quebec want to become 10% of a new nation, do AB, BC and SK find a better deal with the West Coast going solo, or a better deal as part of a greater whole, where do the FN slot in, does Ontario except no longer being #1?

There's a reason why when Turks and Caicos was being discussed, Nova Scotia was considering annexing it in order to avoid a new province scenario.

In my view, Canada stays as it is, or splinters... we're not bringing in new provinces or territories. Too many underlying fault lines in Confederation held together by the fact that change is difficult and unpredictable.
Agree with what you're saying, and I think in the next 50 years this might become a reality (with all the political stuff happening worldwide right now-Brexit, Trump, etc, how long until Quebec wants out here? If that happens, I can see BC/AB/SK saying "forget the rest of you guys").

But I also think in the USA this will happen. I doubt CA, OR, WA would join Canada, but I can see them splitting off from the union, especially if things become more and more polarized between rural/urban type class warfare.

Many are correct in saying the western states have a lot of social issues. HOWEVER, they also have huge economies and a good liberal populace, so those issues should be able to get sorted out.
__________________
REDVAN!

Last edited by REDVAN; 02-06-2017 at 11:59 AM. Reason: clarification
REDVAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:51 AM.

Calgary Flames
2023-24




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021