10-23-2016, 07:55 PM
|
#21
|
#1 Goaltender
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Calgary
|
A long time ago I could do the math that would tell you what the probability is that this six game sample is representative of the whole season, but I seem to recall that the odds of a winning team having a 1-4-1 stretch over 7% of a season are pretty low.
Election results are called on lower percentages of reporting districts. If SportsClubStats says 29%, I'd say that is the best chance they have. Would love to be proven wrong.
__________________
GO FLAMES GO
|
|
|
10-23-2016, 07:59 PM
|
#22
|
Franchise Player
|
Playoffs!?... playoffs??
|
|
|
10-23-2016, 08:00 PM
|
#23
|
Franchise Player
|
SportsClubStats has the probabilities at 29.7% using it's weighted method (taking the opponents record and home field advantage into account when randomly picking scores), and at 41.4% using the 50/50 coin flip method. Weighting the results after 6 games seems premature.
|
|
|
10-23-2016, 08:03 PM
|
#24
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Thunder Bay Ontario
|
I say we have a better chance at getting Nolan Patrick then making the playoffs.
__________________
Fan of the Flames, where being OK has become OK.
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Poe969 For This Useful Post:
|
|
10-23-2016, 08:04 PM
|
#25
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Finger Cookin
SportsClubStats has the probabilities at 29.7% using it's weighted method (taking the opponents record and home field advantage into account when randomly picking scores), and at 41.4% using the 50/50 coin flip method. Weighting the results after 6 games seems premature.
|
Not to mention if the Flames win their next game, the percentages change dramatically.
|
|
|
10-23-2016, 08:07 PM
|
#26
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Barthelona
|
23%
But if Monahan continues to ghost, 13%
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by snipetype
k im just not going to respond to your #### anymore because i have better things to do like #### my model girlfriend rather then try to convince people like you of commonly held hockey knowledge.
|
|
|
|
10-23-2016, 08:08 PM
|
#27
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Kelowna
|
I'd say 50/50 at this point, but if the losing ways go past 5 games less than 10%
|
|
|
10-23-2016, 08:12 PM
|
#28
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by edn88
A long time ago I could do the math that would tell you what the probability is that this six game sample is representative of the whole season, but I seem to recall that the odds of a winning team having a 1-4-1 stretch over 7% of a season are pretty low.
Election results are called on lower percentages of reporting districts. If SportsClubStats says 29%, I'd say that is the best chance they have. Would love to be proven wrong.
|
The Penguins did it last year. Went 1-6-1 and lost 4 in a row a separate time.
http://www.hockey-reference.com/team...016_games.html
I would disagree that the odds of it happening are that low but am too lazy to calculate. I suspect at least 25% of playoff teams have 6 game stretches of 1-4-1 or worse
Edit: sharks did to 1-5-0 after a 4 game win streak to start the season, so did Tampa, so did Chicago.
Of the 5 teams I've checked only St Louis didn't have a 1-4-1 6 game segment or worse and they had a 1-3-1.
Last edited by GGG; 10-23-2016 at 08:20 PM.
|
|
|
10-23-2016, 08:16 PM
|
#29
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Calgary
Exp:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashasx
Not to mention if the Flames win their next game, the percentages change dramatically.
|
Mine would not change after 1 win. Unless perhaps if they won 10-1 blowout again'st Chicago. If they win 1-0 in an overtime game but were out shot by Chicago 40-15, I would not change my prediction at all.
We have a small sample size. Based more than just on wins and loses, but on how the team is playing and the systems employed, I'd stick with 10%
|
|
|
10-23-2016, 08:17 PM
|
#30
|
First Line Centre
|
Zero chance of the playoffs at this point.... I would be happy if they at least entertain us now
|
|
|
10-23-2016, 08:21 PM
|
#31
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: May 2011
Location: in the belly of the beast.
|
its early yet but the effort so far lacking its not lookin good to go anywhere
|
|
|
10-23-2016, 08:23 PM
|
#32
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: CGY
|
Let's remember, in the first 6 six games last season, the Ducks went 1-4-1 as well and we all know how that went. Still lots of hockey to be played.
__________________
Sam "Beard" Bennett
|
|
|
10-23-2016, 08:25 PM
|
#33
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: F*** me. We're so f***ing good, you check the f***ing standings? Lets f***ing go! F***ing practice!
|
50-50 at this point.
Things have to change. We know how these guys can play and they haven't been close to it yet.
__________________
Backlund for Selke 2017 2018
Oilers suck.
|
|
|
10-23-2016, 08:28 PM
|
#34
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Cape Breton Island
|
5%
|
|
|
10-23-2016, 08:35 PM
|
#35
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Calgary
|
100℅
__________________
"May those who accept their fate find happiness. May those who defy it find glory."
|
|
|
10-23-2016, 08:36 PM
|
#36
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Resurrection
5%
|
You are too kind... The jets, my other favourite team have about 5% after getting smeared at home, in a big outdoor national event..
|
|
|
10-24-2016, 05:37 AM
|
#37
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Boca Raton, FL
|
It was always about 50/50 going into the season. Improvements and changes were made to both the roster and coaching staff, but based on last year's results, there was a long way to go even if things went well.
Now, with the rough start of our star players and the inability of the coaching staff to get the team to play a cohesive game, I would drop those chances to around 20%.
Not because I think a season is lost just a few games in, but more because the team will be too far behind by the time they get things figured out...if they ever do.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by ResAlien
If we can't fall in love with replaceable bottom 6 players then the terrorists have won.
|
|
|
|
10-24-2016, 06:16 AM
|
#39
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Calgary
|
90%
This team is deeper than Arizona, Los Angeles, and Vancouver at a minimum and over 82 games, they should be better than each of them. The McDavid factor is a question mark.
Three teams make it, two should be in (SJ + ANA)
So it could come down to a battle of Alberta for the last spot. Not sure the Pacific will get a wild card spot.
__________________
Fireside Chat - The #1 Flames Fan Podcast - FiresideChat.ca
|
|
|
10-24-2016, 06:36 AM
|
#40
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
There is a small mathematical chance but the reality is this the run the team would need to go on isnt going to happen. .700 or better for the remainder of the season? The team isnt that good on paper if you even imagine everyone having career seasons.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:24 PM.
|
|