Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-28-2015, 02:53 PM   #1581
CaptainCrunch
Norm!
 
CaptainCrunch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Exp:
Default

This sounds a lot like the Chinese during the Korean war and the Russians' during the Korean war, when suddenly Chinese and Russian "Volunteers" started showing up in theatre.

People were screaming about the involvement of the Russians and Chinese who would shrug and say that they "Couldn't control their people's freedom of choice to participate in the struggle against the West"

To me this doesn't sound like a prelude to an all out Russian offensive as much as they are augmenting Ukrainian irregulars with equipment and trained troops.

to me there is no doubt that the more sophisticated weapons that take years of training to operate like advanced anti aircraft systems and advanced battle tanks are being operated by Sovi-err Russian troops.

But unless American or other intelligence agencies start keeping count on troops and tanks on the Russian side and can track their activities in the Ukraine, the Russians who have removed numbering and unit tags can simply say "Prove it was us".

The natural response from NATO is one or two or three things

!) They can petition the UN to intercede and place a Peace keeping force in there, however the Russians, and their now close buddies the Chinese will use their veto. (Plus we all know what I think of the UN).

2) NATO can get involved directly, put troops and heavy armor and artillery formation on the ground and try to bluff the Russians to back down. Which I don't like because the Russian's and their allies there have had time to dig in, have a short logistical line and have a strong force on fore advantage.

3) NATO can start supplying more weapons, and logistical support, however this will lead to bloodier battles and a lot more deaths on both sides.
__________________
My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;

Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!
CaptainCrunch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2015, 02:55 PM   #1582
Weitz
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blankall View Post
Don't know if this has been brought up already, but the Superbowl Ring theft scandal is ridiculous.

Basically, the gist of what happened:

Putin asks Robert Kraft, of the Patriot's, if he can see his Superbowl ring. He then pockets it and walks out, while surrounded by body guards. Putin initially denies any knowledge of the ring, but then later claims it as a gift after it shows up in a museum.

http://www.theguardian.com/world/201...-patriots-ring

He did it just because he could.
Not gonna lie, that's a pretty boss move. And Robert Kraft is a tool so good for Putin.
Weitz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2015, 03:00 PM   #1583
Locke
Franchise Player
 
Locke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Income Tax Central
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blankall View Post
Don't know if this has been brought up already, but the Superbowl Ring theft scandal is ridiculous.

Basically, the gist of what happened:

Putin asks Robert Kraft, of the Patriot's, if he can see his Superbowl ring. He then pockets it and walks out, while surrounded by body guards. Putin initially denies any knowledge of the ring, but then later claims it as a gift after it shows up in a museum.

http://www.theguardian.com/world/201...-patriots-ring

He did it just because he could.
I dont know what to say to that. In its own way its evil yet somehow awesome?
__________________
The Beatings Shall Continue Until Morale Improves!

This Post Has Been Distilled for the Eradication of Seemingly Incurable Sadness.

If you are flammable and have legs, you are never blocking a Fire Exit. - Mitch Hedberg
Locke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2015, 03:03 PM   #1584
FlamesAddiction
Franchise Player
 
FlamesAddiction's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nik- View Post
NATO should support another Islamic insurgency against Russia?

Umm, let's learn some lessons, shall we?
Afghanistan was different. It was not within Russian borders.

Besides, not all of the separatist groups in Russia are Islamic in nature, although granted they are likely ones with the most will to fight.
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."
FlamesAddiction is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2015, 04:15 PM   #1585
FlameOn
Franchise Player
 
FlameOn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainCrunch View Post

People were screaming about the involvement of the Russians and Chinese who would shrug and say that they "Couldn't control their people's freedom of choice to participate in the struggle against the West"

To me this doesn't sound like a prelude to an all out Russian offensive as much as they are augmenting Ukrainian irregulars with equipment and trained troops.
So in an ideal international framework, at what point do we start labeling countries as aggressors? What point do we stop calling these pro-Russia rebels and just Russian 'irregular' troops fighting a proxy battle? There just seems to be no way to stop Russia from doing this without some kind of large bloody Western presence in the area.

Russia also just outlawed reporting of Russian troop casualties. All deaths tolls are consider state secrets and reporters will be prosecuted under state secret laws.
http://www.theguardian.com/world/201...-state-secrets
FlameOn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2015, 04:36 PM   #1586
CaptainCrunch
Norm!
 
CaptainCrunch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Exp:
Default

The big question is how can you track the equipment and soldiers back to Russia?

On the equipment side of things the Russians seem to be very careful in removing identifying marks from the equipment they're sending in. No unit badges, no unit numbers, I'm betting the serial numbers have been removed. So the Russians can say

1) Hey we sold a lot of equipment to the Ukrainians, the stuff that the rebels are using probably came from their war stocks.

2) We have a black market problem here, we've had a lot of equipment stolen, its criminals and arms dealers supplying the rebels and not us.

With the soldiers, its just as easy

1) They're not wearing our unit badges, and not wearing our uniforms, so even if they're Russians and former members of our armed forces, they could be volunteers that traveled to join them, kind of like ISIS. I'm betting anything that anyone that goes into the Ukraine is either recently demobilized or officially AWOL. Which is a nice twist because if one of them is captured, they merely have to say, this guy is AWOL so he should be placed into our custody for punishment.

Frankly the only way to deal with this is to treat the entire Ukrainian rebel militia as insurgents and not under the protection of the Geneva Convention.

The International Courts can't do anything because they don't have strong evidence that the Russians as a country are doing this.

The UN can't do anything because China or Russia will veto anything that hits the UN Security Council.

Nato could do something, and are really obligated to do it under the deal that the Ukraine made years ago in giving up their Nuclear stock pile. But the Russians have more tanks, planes, artillery, soldiers, ships and a shorter logistics trail then Nato does. If Nato does go in and attack the rebel held areas where a lot of Russian declared civilians live, the Russians will claim justification in going in to protect them.

As much as Putin is crazy, he knows all the moves here.
__________________
My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;

Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!
CaptainCrunch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2015, 06:19 PM   #1587
FlameOn
Franchise Player
 
FlameOn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainCrunch View Post
The big question is how can you track the equipment and soldiers back to Russia?

On the equipment side of things the Russians seem to be very careful in removing identifying marks from the equipment they're sending in. No unit badges, no unit numbers, I'm betting the serial numbers have been removed. So the Russians can say

1) Hey we sold a lot of equipment to the Ukrainians, the stuff that the rebels are using probably came from their war stocks.

2) We have a black market problem here, we've had a lot of equipment stolen, its criminals and arms dealers supplying the rebels and not us.

As much as Putin is crazy, he knows all the moves here.
With the soldiers and equipment it's been easy to spot. Soldiers have been spotted with scopes and arms that are Spetznaz specific kit. As all the old Russian old war stock (that is cold war era and similar to what Ukraine has) is destroyed by Ukrainian forces, the new stuff Russian has been shipping in is new, as in brand new, tank and APC variants that no one but the Russians have. They have been numerous pictures of these as well as transport markings that are specific to the Russian rail system.

Unfortunately like you say, Russia could still claim black market so the ICC can't touch him. Putin is a sly one, though I wonder when the Russian oligarchs that back him will get fed up with how much he's screwed over the Russian economy.
FlameOn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2015, 10:28 AM   #1588
undercoverbrother
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Sylvan Lake
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FlameOn View Post
With the soldiers and equipment it's been easy to spot. Soldiers have been spotted with scopes and arms that are Spetznaz specific kit. As all the old Russian old war stock (that is cold war era and similar to what Ukraine has) is destroyed by Ukrainian forces, the new stuff Russian has been shipping in is new, as in brand new, tank and APC variants that no one but the Russians have. They have been numerous pictures of these as well as transport markings that are specific to the Russian rail system.

Unfortunately like you say, Russia could still claim black market so the ICC can't touch him. Putin is a sly one, though I wonder when the Russian oligarchs that back him will get fed up with how much he's screwed over the Russian economy.
Can you please post some sources for this?

It isn't that I don't believe you, I am interested in reading it.

Cheers
undercoverbrother is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2015, 11:23 AM   #1589
CaptainCrunch
Norm!
 
CaptainCrunch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FlameOn View Post
With the soldiers and equipment it's been easy to spot. Soldiers have been spotted with scopes and arms that are Spetznaz specific kit. As all the old Russian old war stock (that is cold war era and similar to what Ukraine has) is destroyed by Ukrainian forces, the new stuff Russian has been shipping in is new, as in brand new, tank and APC variants that no one but the Russians have. They have been numerous pictures of these as well as transport markings that are specific to the Russian rail system.

Unfortunately like you say, Russia could still claim black market so the ICC can't touch him. Putin is a sly one, though I wonder when the Russian oligarchs that back him will get fed up with how much he's screwed over the Russian economy.
I don't know dude, I'm not current anymore on European arms.

But I believe that the Ukrainians use the T-84 which is similar to the T-80 Russian main battle tank. Russia primarily uses the T-90 MBT, however when they retired their T-80s, about 4000 of them, they put them into storage, I'm betting if we saw satellite pictures of the Russian forces gathering on the border you'd see some T-80s

The Ukrainians use mainly the BTR-4 APC/AFV, which is pretty similar in appearance to the Russian BTR-90

The Ukraines also have a health number of BTR-94's which are a modification of the Russian BTR-80 which the Russians still have in service.

The standing personal weapons that the Spetznaz uses have been imported all over the world, they're not exclusive to Russia, so Russia's argument remains the same, we sell thousands of these weapons to other countries, how they end up in the hands of Ukrainian fighters is beyond our control.

Hell the Ukrainian military uses a lot of the same anti aircraft and artillery as the Russian military including the Buk systems.

Its going to be difficult to prove Russian intentions or involvement unless you capture someone that can prove that he's taking orders from Russia while wearing Russian unit identifiers and driving equiptment that they can prove comes from Russian active war stocks.
__________________
My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;

Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!
CaptainCrunch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2015, 11:26 AM   #1590
FlameOn
Franchise Player
 
FlameOn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by undercoverbrother View Post
Can you please post some sources for this?

It isn't that I don't believe you, I am interested in reading it.

Cheers
Lots of these were previously mentioned in the thread. When things started hitting the fan all the "rebels" showed up, it was immediately clear that they were using Russian Spetznaz kit. Weapons analysis here of the supposed "rebels" at the time from my previous post:
http://forum.calgarypuck.com/showpos...&postcount=283
Every piece of these rebel's equipment were direct issue from Russian special forces and far far better than what regular Russian or Ukrainian regular grunts would be using. Ukrainians don't use any of this equipment.

Tanks and equipment that rebels are using are all Russian variants and modernizations with French optics and they still even have the fresh Russian railway transport markers.
http://forum.calgarypuck.com/showpos...postcount=1386

Modern Russian Anti-aircraft system used by the "rebels" that the Ukrainians don't have at all. Evidence provided by MI6.
http://forum.calgarypuck.com/showpos...postcount=1451

Artillery attack analysis from Bellingcat (respected British investigative journalists) analyzed the artillery attack patterns for the supposed "rebel" fire support from commercial satellite imagery/Russian social media and they all came from within Russia.
https://www.bellingcat.com/news/uk-a...llery-attacks/

Conclusion: "rebels" are at best Ukrainians with very very extensive Russian training and almost all equipment provided by Russia (though that well trained in a month to start of hostilities is a really long stretch). Far more likely, (given the training, organization and coordination against Ukrainian troops + support), they are mostly VDV/Spetznaz special forces acting as "rebels" fighting the Ukrainian military. How else is it within a month you'd have entire regiments of "rebels" that know how to operate the tanks, artillery AND long range self-propelled anti-aircraft missile launchers used effectively against Ukrainian army. Putin admitted as much at least in Crimea, but hasn't yet for Eastern Ukraine.

Last edited by FlameOn; 05-29-2015 at 10:18 PM.
FlameOn is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to FlameOn For This Useful Post:
Old 05-29-2015, 11:35 AM   #1591
FlameOn
Franchise Player
 
FlameOn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainCrunch View Post
I don't know dude, I'm not current anymore on European arms.

But I believe that the Ukrainians use the T-84 which is similar to the T-80 Russian main battle tank. Russia primarily uses the T-90 MBT, however when they retired their T-80s, about 4000 of them, they put them into storage, I'm betting if we saw satellite pictures of the Russian forces gathering on the border you'd see some T-80s

The Ukrainians use mainly the BTR-4 APC/AFV, which is pretty similar in appearance to the Russian BTR-90

The Ukraines also have a health number of BTR-94's which are a modification of the Russian BTR-80 which the Russians still have in service.

The standing personal weapons that the Spetznaz uses have been imported all over the world, they're not exclusive to Russia, so Russia's argument remains the same, we sell thousands of these weapons to other countries, how they end up in the hands of Ukrainian fighters is beyond our control.

Hell the Ukrainian military uses a lot of the same anti aircraft and artillery as the Russian military including the Buk systems.

Its going to be difficult to prove Russian intentions or involvement unless you capture someone that can prove that he's taking orders from Russia while wearing Russian unit identifiers and driving equipment that they can prove comes from Russian active war stocks.
There is a lot of overlap, but what are the chances that so many coincidences happen with all the equipment being used lining up directly with Russian military/special forces, with such regularity in exactly the same combinations. Also the modernized T-72B3s (circa 2013) and the SA-22 systems I mentioned in my last post were a dead giveaway as Russian supplied. How do entire regiments of weapons disappear from inventory without someone hiring up not investigating this.

Unless someone subscribes to the Soviet/NK propaganda departments, it is pretty clear where this stuff is coming from just with inferred evidence. Just I don't think there is strong enough of a case for prosecution, like you said, without some leaked Russian order papers and non-retroactively discharged soldiers being captured and ratting out the whole system to the ICC/press.

Last edited by FlameOn; 05-29-2015 at 11:50 AM.
FlameOn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2015, 11:48 AM   #1592
shermanator
Franchise Player
 
shermanator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blankall View Post
Don't know if this has been brought up already, but the Superbowl Ring theft scandal is ridiculous.

Basically, the gist of what happened:

Putin asks Robert Kraft, of the Patriot's, if he can see his Superbowl ring. He then pockets it and walks out, while surrounded by body guards. Putin initially denies any knowledge of the ring, but then later claims it as a gift after it shows up in a museum.

http://www.theguardian.com/world/201...-patriots-ring

He did it just because he could.
I never thought the following situation in The Simpsons could ACTUALLY happen.

* Mr Burns flashes a trillion dollar bill in front of Fidel Castro *

"May I see"
"Look with your eyes, not with your hands"
"Please, we are all amigos here"
"Mr Burns, I think we can trust the President of Cuba"
"Now give it back"
"Give what back?"

__________________

shermanator is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to shermanator For This Useful Post:
Old 05-30-2015, 11:05 AM   #1593
Itse
Franchise Player
 
Itse's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Exp:
Default

I thought this was pretty funny. From around the Russian Victory Day celebration.



There's of course also a less funny side to the official denial, even for the Russian soldiers themselves.

http://in.reuters.com/article/2015/0...0O723I20150522

Quote:
Two Russian men captured by Ukrainian forces fighting pro-Russian rebels have told a newspaper they were in Ukraine on a mission for the Russian military, contradicting Moscow's official line.

Speaking from a hospital bed in Kiev, one of the men, Alexander Alexandrov, became tearful when his interviewer told him his relatives had told Russian state media that he had quit the Russian military before heading to Ukraine.

"Why are they turning their backs on me?" he was quoted as saying by the Russian weekly Novaya Gazeta. "There was an order. I gave my oath to the motherland ... There was an order and, as a military man, I carried it out."

Ukraine's military said the two men had been wounded in a firefight in eastern Ukraine, and were being treated for their injuries. Authorities in Kiev have said they will be charged with "terrorist acts".
Quote:
But by insisting that any Russian fighters in the area are merely volunteers, Moscow finds itself unable to follow its own code of honour by standing up for servicemen who are captured.
Itse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2015, 11:26 AM   #1594
simmonjam1
Crash and Bang Winger
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: #### off
Exp:
Default

There was a documentary on Vice recently about Russia's 'Ghost' Army.

https://news.vice.com/video/russias-...ne-full-length
simmonjam1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2015, 01:08 PM   #1595
Language
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Exp:
Default

Another excellent bit of investigative journalism by Vice's Simon Ostrovsky on Russia's military involvement in Ukraine.

Language is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2017, 08:44 AM   #1596
undercoverbrother
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Sylvan Lake
Exp:
Default

While this is no longer flavour of the week, it still rages on

http://www.reuters.com/article/ukrai...-idUSR4N1FC024
__________________
Captain James P. DeCOSTE, CD, 18 Sep 1993

Corporal Jean-Marc H. BECHARD, 6 Aug 1993

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sliver View Post
Just ignore me...I'm in a mood today.
undercoverbrother is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to undercoverbrother For This Useful Post:
Old 01-31-2017, 09:53 AM   #1597
peter12
Franchise Player
 
peter12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Exp:
Default

Missed this during the summer, but Canada has pulled our remaining TOWs out of storage to be reintroduced to regular infantry battalions as part of an effort to beef up our presence in Eastern Europe.

Not sure how many of the launchers or missiles we still have, but as far as I know, TOW remains among the best anti-tank systems in the world.
peter12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2017, 10:07 AM   #1598
undercoverbrother
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Sylvan Lake
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by peter12 View Post
Missed this during the summer, but Canada has pulled our remaining TOWs out of storage to be reintroduced to regular infantry battalions as part of an effort to beef up our presence in Eastern Europe.

Not sure how many of the launchers or missiles we still have, but as far as I know, TOW remains among the best anti-tank systems in the world.
TOW is an absolute thing of beauty.

As good TOW can be absolutely deadly.

I wonder if the ordnance has kept up with the technology in armour.
__________________
Captain James P. DeCOSTE, CD, 18 Sep 1993

Corporal Jean-Marc H. BECHARD, 6 Aug 1993

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sliver View Post
Just ignore me...I'm in a mood today.
undercoverbrother is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2017, 10:41 AM   #1599
CaptainCrunch
Norm!
 
CaptainCrunch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by undercoverbrother View Post
TOW is an absolute thing of beauty.

As good TOW can be absolutely deadly.

I wonder if the ordnance has kept up with the technology in armour.
I'm confused, because I thought that Canada had sold most of its Tow 2 stock to the US marines 2 years ago,

I guess it depends on how many we have left, the 2A is designed as a pure armor penetrater, and is supposed to be effective against modern main battle tanks with reactive armor. the 2B is probably the better weapon as it attacks tanks from above where the armor is thinner.

I don't know how the Tow would do against the newer main battle tanks. the T-90''s are suppossed to have three levels of protection. A very heavy armor a second armor skin that's reactive and their Shtora counter measures suite that can alert the crew of the tank being panted to they can turn the turret and fire on the enemy position before they get a shot off.

If the Russians have T-14 Armata's in the field and suppossedly they've built over 100 of them, I really don't know how well the Tow would do. the T-14 has duel reactive armor and the Aghanit missile interception system, this system has a duel passive/active defense. The passive is designed to jam the missile guidance system. The active fires a penetrator at the missile destroying it far away. This system is designed to defeat the latest generation of anti-tank missiles, so I would assume that missiles like the Hellfire, the Tow and Brimstone for example wouldn't be as effective.

As well the T-14 has an unmanned turret so its cross section is lower, and its coated with radar defeating material and thermal defeating technology.

Its considered a next generation up from the M1 tank, and countries like Germany are working on developing bigger main guns to combat the T14's armor and defensive capabilities.

Right now, just looking it up the Russians have over 100 of the T-14's in active units and about 600 of the T90's upgraded.



__________________
My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;

Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!
CaptainCrunch is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to CaptainCrunch For This Useful Post:
Old 01-31-2017, 10:54 AM   #1600
nik-
Franchise Player
 
nik-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Exp:
Default

The Russians certainly still love their tanks.
nik- is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
corruption , dictatorship , historyrepeats , pinkocommies , protest , putinomics , soviet expansion


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:11 PM.

Calgary Flames
2023-24




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021