Quote:
Originally Posted by wooohooo
I'm curious why you say this. From my knowledge they're mainly trained in the states and their training is equivalent to medical doctors and often go to the same schools but specializing in the foot instead. This was of course talking to family in the medical field (not podiatrists).
|
I say this for a number of reasons:
There is no way their training is even close to that of a foot and ankle surgeon. Even if the quality of study is comparable (nope), the length of time invested in training is certainly not. A foot & ankle surgeon has 10-12 years of accredited post secondary training before they'll even get a sniff of employment in a big city, and this is not including any degrees obtained before medical school.
The proof is reflected in the scope of practice, as podiatrists have a very limited list of procedures they can do, and its essentially centered around bunions, hallux valgus, orthotics and diabetic foot surveillance. A foot & ankle surgeon could do anything like reconstruct an entire traumatized limb while maintaining functionality, prosthetic arthroplasties, amputations, tendon transfers, ligament repairs...etc.
Talk to any foot and ankle surgeon for their opinion. One of them tells me of a US colleague where 50% of his practice is fixing podiatrist f-ups, particularily crappy bunionectomies where they indiscriminately shave off the bone and part of the joint causing premature osteoarthritis.
The evidence for bunion preventative measures and "fixing" them is garbage, with outcomes essentially boiling down to cosmetics and being able to cram your foot into a high heel shoe. OK that's important to some people, but the whole cottage industry is deceptively touted by podiatrists as being so much more. Don't even get me started on Orthotics.