03-07-2014, 12:14 PM
|
#41
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Da_Chief
Next years projection (obviously way early)
30. Buffalo
29. Islanders
28. Flames
27. Oilers
26. Canucks
25. Panthers
We will have a real good shot at McDavid or Eichel.
|
Assuming NYI defer their first round pick they have to give us to next year, that would give Buffalo something like a 60% chance of drafting McDavid AND Eichel. Omg.
|
|
|
03-07-2014, 12:25 PM
|
#42
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by OutOfTheCube
Assuming NYI defer their first round pick they have to give us to next year, that would give Buffalo something like a 60% chance of drafting McDavid AND Eichel. Omg.
|
Garth Snow is a certified idiot. Wouldn't rule it out.
__________________
Until the Flames make the Western Finals again, this signature shall remain frozen.
|
|
|
03-07-2014, 12:35 PM
|
#43
|
Some kinda newsbreaker!
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Da_Chief
Don't worry we won't intentionally tank but this team will not be better next year and we're 4th last right now.
What's going to make it better next year? I don't see anything, only see things that wil make it even a longer year next year.
-Cammi will be gone so thats even less offence.
-I can see Glencross dealt at the draft not like he cares, he checked out when Gio got the C.
-We'll just have more rookies up front with Monahan likely struggling with sophomore slump.
-Gio has played way above his normal self, he will be good but hard to imagine he will have the energy to keep playing as hard as he has next year.
Ramo and Ortio will/should gain bit more consistency though.
Buffalo will still be brutal.
Vancouver will join the bottom but with them keeping Sedin I don't think they'll be all out tank mode.
Edmonton will still be crap but should improve a bit no? like seriously.
Florida with Lou and some good young pieces upfront will be better imo
Islanders? no goalie will still suck
Next years projection (obviously way early)
30. Buffalo
29. Islanders
28. Flames
27. Oilers
26. Canucks
25. Panthers
We will have a real good shot at McDavid or Eichel.
|
Real good shot as in 14.2%?
Assuming the Flames finish 28th overall. And McDavid/eichel are consensus 1 and 2. Only way Flames get either is to win the lottery
Even if they finish 29th overall, there is a 56.2% chance they won't get either.
Only way to get a guaranteed shot at one of them is to finish 30th and given this season and the fact there is more incentive for teams to tank next year, that won't be easy?
|
|
|
03-07-2014, 12:49 PM
|
#44
|
#1 Goaltender
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Back in Calgary!!
|
This whole McDavid thing sometimes keeps me awake at night. The fact that this is as close as this franchise could be to having a generational talent in 10 years or more, and we likely won't get him. I don't even like to think about it.
Yet when you look at Pittsburgh, with arguably 2 generational talents. They only have 1 cup.
For every Pittsburgh, there is a Boston, Carolina, Chicago, even Colorado.
It would be supremely awesome to get McDavid. But I don't think its necessary.
|
|
|
03-07-2014, 12:53 PM
|
#45
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by H2SO4(aq)
what is with everyone saying stuff like this? Does everyone think Burke only wants bottom six muckers or something? I think if we are drafting top 10, he will be aiming at adding some high end scoring to our prospect pool.
|
I was thinking more of the 2nd round.
At the time I made that post, Konecny was projected as bottom-1st (could likely trade for at 2015 deadline) or early 2nd (where we'd be finishing at anyways) and McKenzie was projected as a late 2nd.
Both have recently risen in draft standings.
__________________
Until the Flames make the Western Finals again, this signature shall remain frozen.
|
|
|
03-07-2014, 12:55 PM
|
#46
|
Franchise Player
|
Oh and the Isles would be smart to cut their loses and give them the pick this year instead of giving them a generational talent next year.
Snow should be fired.
|
|
|
03-07-2014, 12:58 PM
|
#47
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sa226
This whole McDavid thing sometimes keeps me awake at night. The fact that this is as close as this franchise could be to having a generational talent in 10 years or more, and we likely won't get him. I don't even like to think about it.
Yet when you look at Pittsburgh, with arguably 2 generational talents. They only have 1 cup.
For every Pittsburgh, there is a Boston, Carolina, Chicago, even Colorado.
It would be supremely awesome to get McDavid. But I don't think its necessary.
|
Crosby is the closest thing to a generational talent this generation, but I don't know if he is that head and shoulders above everyone else. The gap between him and other players isn't nearly as big as it was when looking at "generational" players like Gretzky and Orr. I am not even sure if I would put him in Lemieux territory in terms of where he is relative to his peers.
It is of course partly because the whole upper tier of talent is more competitive now than it used to be. The whole notion of a "generational" talent is becoming obsolete.
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."
Last edited by FlamesAddiction; 03-07-2014 at 01:03 PM.
|
|
|
03-07-2014, 12:59 PM
|
#48
|
I believe in the Jays.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sa226
This whole McDavid thing sometimes keeps me awake at night. The fact that this is as close as this franchise could be to having a generational talent in 10 years or more, and we likely won't get him.
|
Yeah, probably not... but then no one is likely to get him. Even the worst team in the league (whomever that ends up being) only has a 25% chance.
Fact is that once we spend what we have to spend to get to the cap floor the total team talent likely lands right about where we are this year. Even so, as nice as McDavid or Eichel would be, the 2015 draft is deep... I certainly wouldn't sneeze at adding a Barzal/Hanifin to the ranks.
|
|
|
03-07-2014, 01:03 PM
|
#49
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by OutOfTheCube
Assuming NYI defer their first round pick they have to give us to next year, that would give Buffalo something like a 60% chance of drafting McDavid AND Eichel. Omg.
|
I think you might be bad at math.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to IamNotKenKing For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-07-2014, 01:12 PM
|
#50
|
I believe in the Jays.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by IamNotKenKing
I think you might be bad at math.
|
Heh.
Sorry cube he's right... it'd be a max 43.8% chance (assuming that both the Sabres and Islander finish in the dead bottom of the league). Personally I think the Islanders finish better then that. Uninjured Tavaras + Young guys getting a year closer to their prime + a lot of decent goalies up as UFA's + No incentive to finish low.
|
|
|
03-07-2014, 01:18 PM
|
#51
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Thunder Bay Ontario
|
I think ideally the isles would give the sabres this years pick, the sabres get 1 and 2 in this years pick and trade one of them to the Flames so we can pick Ekblad. The isles keep next years pick and end up in 9th. Flames finish 30th next year and get McDavid.
I can dream can't I?
__________________
Fan of the Flames, where being OK has become OK.
|
|
|
03-07-2014, 01:24 PM
|
#52
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Poe969
I think ideally the isles would give the sabres this years pick, the sabres get 1 and 2 in this years pick and trade one of them to the Flames so we can pick Ekblad. The isles keep next years pick and end up in 9th. Flames finish 30th next year and get McDavid.
I can dream can't I?
|
Never hurts to dream big, but who the heck would they want for 1st or 2nd overall? Gio+?
__________________
Until the Flames make the Western Finals again, this signature shall remain frozen.
|
|
|
03-07-2014, 01:26 PM
|
#53
|
Powerplay Quarterback
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gaskal
Never hurts to dream big, but who the heck would they want for 1st or 2nd overall? Gio+?
|
Well if Cammy is worth Drouin then certainly the negotiating rights to Cammy has to be worth 1st or 2nd overall doesn't it?
|
|
|
03-07-2014, 01:26 PM
|
#54
|
Posted the 2 millionth post!
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gaskal
Never hurts to dream big, but who the heck would they want for 1st or 2nd overall? Gio+?
|
Maybe our 1st 2014 + 2nd 2014 + ____ for Buffalo 1st 2014?
It would have to be something similar to that I assume.
|
|
|
03-07-2014, 01:29 PM
|
#55
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Thunder Bay Ontario
|
I'm thinking if we finish bottom 5 we could send our first + someone like Sven or a prospect or later pick (avs 2nd) to move up a few spots.
As for 2015, I don't think they'll be a chance any team moves that #1 pick.
__________________
Fan of the Flames, where being OK has become OK.
|
|
|
03-07-2014, 01:33 PM
|
#56
|
Franchise Player
|
I don't really watch junior hockey but why is McDavid considered to be such a generational talent? I've seen some hilight reels but his numbers really don't look amazing.
51 games - 22 goals - 86 points
When I think "generational talent" I think of Gretzky, Lemieux, Crosby.
Gretzky 2nd year in junior: 64 games - 70 goals - 182 points
Lemieux 2nd year in junior: 66 games - 84 goals - 184 points
Lemieux's 3rd year was amazing 70 games - 133 goals - 282 points
Crosby 2nd year in junior: 62 games - 66 goals - 168 points
Not trying to dump on the kid but what am I missing here?
|
|
|
03-07-2014, 01:36 PM
|
#57
|
#1 Goaltender
|
John Tavares had better number than that as well. http://www.hockeydb.com/ihdb/stats/p....php?pid=89823
There was a bit of generational player talk around Tavares, but not nearly as much as there is around McDavid.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by JobHopper
The thing is, my posts, thoughts and insights may be my opinions but they're also quite factual.
|
|
|
|
03-07-2014, 01:45 PM
|
#58
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Parallex
Heh.
Sorry cube he's right... it'd be a max 43.8% chance (assuming that both the Sabres and Islander finish in the dead bottom of the league). Personally I think the Islanders finish better then that. Uninjured Tavaras + Young guys getting a year closer to their prime + a lot of decent goalies up as UFA's + No incentive to finish low.
|
Exactly.
43.8% is a far cry from 60%. It's a difference of just under 37%.
(For the mathematically challenged:
60-43.8 = 16.2.
16.2/43.8 = .3698.
So, 16.2 is 36.98% of 42.8).
|
|
|
03-07-2014, 01:51 PM
|
#59
|
Powerplay Quarterback
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GoFlamesGo1989
I know it's is a ways away but I don't think there has been a better looking prospect draft class.
Connor Mcdavid
Jack Eichel
Dylan Strome
Mathew Barzal
All 4 of these are generational talents. Eichel and McDavid are going to be the absolute superstars. Whoever gets one of these guys is going to be set for 10-15 years. It's so exciting to watch.
I'm most intrigued by Eichel have never seen a player with his type of skill set. His first two steps are unbelievable. So strong on his feet with a fantastic passing ability. If he was Canadian he would be getting just as much press as Connor McDavid.
|
Even better than Hall, Yak, and RNH? I find that hard to believe.
|
|
|
03-07-2014, 04:28 PM
|
#60
|
Franchise Player
|
A 44% chance of drafting the two best prospects in ten years is still pretty awesome. 100% chance of getting at least one is great too. Assuming everything falls into place (which it rarely does).
I didn't google the numbers, just took a stab in the dark. Close enough, dorks!
Last edited by OutOfTheCube; 03-07-2014 at 04:30 PM.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to OutOfTheCube For This Useful Post:
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:30 AM.
|
|