Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-07-2014, 12:14 PM   #41
OutOfTheCube
Franchise Player
 
OutOfTheCube's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Da_Chief View Post

Next years projection (obviously way early)
30. Buffalo
29. Islanders
28. Flames
27. Oilers
26. Canucks
25. Panthers

We will have a real good shot at McDavid or Eichel.
Assuming NYI defer their first round pick they have to give us to next year, that would give Buffalo something like a 60% chance of drafting McDavid AND Eichel. Omg.
OutOfTheCube is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2014, 12:25 PM   #42
Gaskal
Franchise Player
 
Gaskal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by OutOfTheCube View Post
Assuming NYI defer their first round pick they have to give us to next year, that would give Buffalo something like a 60% chance of drafting McDavid AND Eichel. Omg.
Garth Snow is a certified idiot. Wouldn't rule it out.
__________________
Until the Flames make the Western Finals again, this signature shall remain frozen.
Gaskal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2014, 12:35 PM   #43
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Da_Chief View Post
Don't worry we won't intentionally tank but this team will not be better next year and we're 4th last right now.

What's going to make it better next year? I don't see anything, only see things that wil make it even a longer year next year.

-Cammi will be gone so thats even less offence.
-I can see Glencross dealt at the draft not like he cares, he checked out when Gio got the C.
-We'll just have more rookies up front with Monahan likely struggling with sophomore slump.
-Gio has played way above his normal self, he will be good but hard to imagine he will have the energy to keep playing as hard as he has next year.

Ramo and Ortio will/should gain bit more consistency though.

Buffalo will still be brutal.
Vancouver will join the bottom but with them keeping Sedin I don't think they'll be all out tank mode.
Edmonton will still be crap but should improve a bit no? like seriously.
Florida with Lou and some good young pieces upfront will be better imo
Islanders? no goalie will still suck

Next years projection (obviously way early)
30. Buffalo
29. Islanders
28. Flames
27. Oilers
26. Canucks
25. Panthers

We will have a real good shot at McDavid or Eichel.
Real good shot as in 14.2%?

Assuming the Flames finish 28th overall. And McDavid/eichel are consensus 1 and 2. Only way Flames get either is to win the lottery

Even if they finish 29th overall, there is a 56.2% chance they won't get either.

Only way to get a guaranteed shot at one of them is to finish 30th and given this season and the fact there is more incentive for teams to tank next year, that won't be easy?
sureLoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2014, 12:49 PM   #44
sa226
#1 Goaltender
 
sa226's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Back in Calgary!!
Exp:
Default

This whole McDavid thing sometimes keeps me awake at night. The fact that this is as close as this franchise could be to having a generational talent in 10 years or more, and we likely won't get him. I don't even like to think about it.

Yet when you look at Pittsburgh, with arguably 2 generational talents. They only have 1 cup.

For every Pittsburgh, there is a Boston, Carolina, Chicago, even Colorado.

It would be supremely awesome to get McDavid. But I don't think its necessary.
sa226 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2014, 12:53 PM   #45
Gaskal
Franchise Player
 
Gaskal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by H2SO4(aq) View Post
what is with everyone saying stuff like this? Does everyone think Burke only wants bottom six muckers or something? I think if we are drafting top 10, he will be aiming at adding some high end scoring to our prospect pool.
I was thinking more of the 2nd round.

At the time I made that post, Konecny was projected as bottom-1st (could likely trade for at 2015 deadline) or early 2nd (where we'd be finishing at anyways) and McKenzie was projected as a late 2nd.

Both have recently risen in draft standings.
__________________
Until the Flames make the Western Finals again, this signature shall remain frozen.
Gaskal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2014, 12:55 PM   #46
Da_Chief
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2007
Exp:
Default

Oh and the Isles would be smart to cut their loses and give them the pick this year instead of giving them a generational talent next year.

Snow should be fired.
Da_Chief is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2014, 12:58 PM   #47
FlamesAddiction
Franchise Player
 
FlamesAddiction's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sa226 View Post
This whole McDavid thing sometimes keeps me awake at night. The fact that this is as close as this franchise could be to having a generational talent in 10 years or more, and we likely won't get him. I don't even like to think about it.

Yet when you look at Pittsburgh, with arguably 2 generational talents. They only have 1 cup.

For every Pittsburgh, there is a Boston, Carolina, Chicago, even Colorado.

It would be supremely awesome to get McDavid. But I don't think its necessary.
Crosby is the closest thing to a generational talent this generation, but I don't know if he is that head and shoulders above everyone else. The gap between him and other players isn't nearly as big as it was when looking at "generational" players like Gretzky and Orr. I am not even sure if I would put him in Lemieux territory in terms of where he is relative to his peers.

It is of course partly because the whole upper tier of talent is more competitive now than it used to be. The whole notion of a "generational" talent is becoming obsolete.
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."

Last edited by FlamesAddiction; 03-07-2014 at 01:03 PM.
FlamesAddiction is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2014, 12:59 PM   #48
Parallex
I believe in the Jays.
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sa226 View Post
This whole McDavid thing sometimes keeps me awake at night. The fact that this is as close as this franchise could be to having a generational talent in 10 years or more, and we likely won't get him.
Yeah, probably not... but then no one is likely to get him. Even the worst team in the league (whomever that ends up being) only has a 25% chance.

Fact is that once we spend what we have to spend to get to the cap floor the total team talent likely lands right about where we are this year. Even so, as nice as McDavid or Eichel would be, the 2015 draft is deep... I certainly wouldn't sneeze at adding a Barzal/Hanifin to the ranks.
Parallex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2014, 01:03 PM   #49
IamNotKenKing
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by OutOfTheCube View Post
Assuming NYI defer their first round pick they have to give us to next year, that would give Buffalo something like a 60% chance of drafting McDavid AND Eichel. Omg.
I think you might be bad at math.
IamNotKenKing is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to IamNotKenKing For This Useful Post:
Old 03-07-2014, 01:12 PM   #50
Parallex
I believe in the Jays.
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IamNotKenKing View Post
I think you might be bad at math.
Heh.

Sorry cube he's right... it'd be a max 43.8% chance (assuming that both the Sabres and Islander finish in the dead bottom of the league). Personally I think the Islanders finish better then that. Uninjured Tavaras + Young guys getting a year closer to their prime + a lot of decent goalies up as UFA's + No incentive to finish low.
Parallex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2014, 01:18 PM   #51
Poe969
Franchise Player
 
Poe969's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Thunder Bay Ontario
Exp:
Default

I think ideally the isles would give the sabres this years pick, the sabres get 1 and 2 in this years pick and trade one of them to the Flames so we can pick Ekblad. The isles keep next years pick and end up in 9th. Flames finish 30th next year and get McDavid.

I can dream can't I?
__________________
Fan of the Flames, where being OK has become OK.
Poe969 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2014, 01:24 PM   #52
Gaskal
Franchise Player
 
Gaskal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Poe969 View Post
I think ideally the isles would give the sabres this years pick, the sabres get 1 and 2 in this years pick and trade one of them to the Flames so we can pick Ekblad. The isles keep next years pick and end up in 9th. Flames finish 30th next year and get McDavid.

I can dream can't I?
Never hurts to dream big, but who the heck would they want for 1st or 2nd overall? Gio+?
__________________
Until the Flames make the Western Finals again, this signature shall remain frozen.
Gaskal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2014, 01:26 PM   #53
FakenHaken
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gaskal View Post
Never hurts to dream big, but who the heck would they want for 1st or 2nd overall? Gio+?
Well if Cammy is worth Drouin then certainly the negotiating rights to Cammy has to be worth 1st or 2nd overall doesn't it?
FakenHaken is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2014, 01:26 PM   #54
ClubFlames
Posted the 2 millionth post!
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gaskal View Post
Never hurts to dream big, but who the heck would they want for 1st or 2nd overall? Gio+?
Maybe our 1st 2014 + 2nd 2014 + ____ for Buffalo 1st 2014?

It would have to be something similar to that I assume.
__________________

ClubFlames is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2014, 01:29 PM   #55
Poe969
Franchise Player
 
Poe969's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Thunder Bay Ontario
Exp:
Default

I'm thinking if we finish bottom 5 we could send our first + someone like Sven or a prospect or later pick (avs 2nd) to move up a few spots.

As for 2015, I don't think they'll be a chance any team moves that #1 pick.
__________________
Fan of the Flames, where being OK has become OK.
Poe969 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2014, 01:33 PM   #56
Jacks
Franchise Player
 
Jacks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default

I don't really watch junior hockey but why is McDavid considered to be such a generational talent? I've seen some hilight reels but his numbers really don't look amazing.

51 games - 22 goals - 86 points

When I think "generational talent" I think of Gretzky, Lemieux, Crosby.
Gretzky 2nd year in junior: 64 games - 70 goals - 182 points
Lemieux 2nd year in junior: 66 games - 84 goals - 184 points
Lemieux's 3rd year was amazing 70 games - 133 goals - 282 points
Crosby 2nd year in junior: 62 games - 66 goals - 168 points

Not trying to dump on the kid but what am I missing here?
Jacks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2014, 01:36 PM   #57
saillias
#1 Goaltender
 
saillias's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Exp:
Default

John Tavares had better number than that as well. http://www.hockeydb.com/ihdb/stats/p....php?pid=89823

There was a bit of generational player talk around Tavares, but not nearly as much as there is around McDavid.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by JobHopper View Post
The thing is, my posts, thoughts and insights may be my opinions but they're also quite factual.
saillias is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2014, 01:45 PM   #58
IamNotKenKing
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Parallex View Post
Heh.

Sorry cube he's right... it'd be a max 43.8% chance (assuming that both the Sabres and Islander finish in the dead bottom of the league). Personally I think the Islanders finish better then that. Uninjured Tavaras + Young guys getting a year closer to their prime + a lot of decent goalies up as UFA's + No incentive to finish low.
Exactly.
43.8% is a far cry from 60%. It's a difference of just under 37%.

(For the mathematically challenged:
60-43.8 = 16.2.
16.2/43.8 = .3698.
So, 16.2 is 36.98% of 42.8).
IamNotKenKing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2014, 01:51 PM   #59
Buck Murdock
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Buck Murdock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GoFlamesGo1989 View Post
I know it's is a ways away but I don't think there has been a better looking prospect draft class.

Connor Mcdavid
Jack Eichel
Dylan Strome
Mathew Barzal

All 4 of these are generational talents. Eichel and McDavid are going to be the absolute superstars. Whoever gets one of these guys is going to be set for 10-15 years. It's so exciting to watch.

I'm most intrigued by Eichel have never seen a player with his type of skill set. His first two steps are unbelievable. So strong on his feet with a fantastic passing ability. If he was Canadian he would be getting just as much press as Connor McDavid.
Even better than Hall, Yak, and RNH? I find that hard to believe.
Buck Murdock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2014, 04:28 PM   #60
OutOfTheCube
Franchise Player
 
OutOfTheCube's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Exp:
Default

A 44% chance of drafting the two best prospects in ten years is still pretty awesome. 100% chance of getting at least one is great too. Assuming everything falls into place (which it rarely does).

I didn't google the numbers, just took a stab in the dark. Close enough, dorks!

Last edited by OutOfTheCube; 03-07-2014 at 04:30 PM.
OutOfTheCube is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to OutOfTheCube For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:30 AM.

Calgary Flames
2023-24




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021