Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-24-2015, 11:14 AM   #1
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default NHL to formally start expansion process (only LV and QC submit applications)

http://www.sportsnet.ca/hockey/nhl/n...nsion-process/

Quote:
Bettman is expected to leave the process open-ended: The NHL is ready to entertain bids, but won't commit to a specific number of teams. It will likely end up being two, but no guarantees will be made.
sureLoss is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to sureLoss For This Useful Post:
Old 06-24-2015, 11:18 AM   #2
Weitz
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Exp:
Default

Ugh. The watering down of the NHL continues.
Weitz is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Weitz For This Useful Post:
Old 06-24-2015, 11:19 AM   #3
OILFAN #81
Everyone's Favorite Oilfan!
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: San Jose, California
Exp:
Default

I love it. Vegas will be one for sure and the second team I'd put in Quebec City. When a team relocates they can go to Seattle. Ideally I'd have the two expansion teams be in Seattle and Quebec City to begin with but Vegas is a done deal it seems like with the arena and season ticket drive.
OILFAN #81 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2015, 11:20 AM   #4
ComixZone
Franchise Player
 
ComixZone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Exp:
Default

So Vegas wins one of the bids undoubtedly...but where that 2nd team ends up though...who knows...
ComixZone is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2015, 11:23 AM   #5
CroFlames
Franchise Player
 
CroFlames's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Exp:
Default

Whoopie! Vegas baby!!!!
CroFlames is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to CroFlames For This Useful Post:
Old 06-24-2015, 11:25 AM   #6
Kavvy
Self Imposed Exile
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

This is so dumb with Phoenix struggling...

Ensure all of your markets are at least semi-healthy prior to taking on expansion teams.
Kavvy is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Kavvy For This Useful Post:
Old 06-24-2015, 11:26 AM   #7
getbak
Franchise Player
 
getbak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Vegas is probably a shoe-in unless they screw something up badly.

Seattle, Portland, Milwaukee, Houston, Kansas City... Any or all of them could bid. If they bid, any of them could be successful. All of them have at least one question mark, mostly about the existence of willing local ownership.

Then, of course, there is the possibility of Toronto2, Hamilton, or Quebec City.
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
getbak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2015, 11:26 AM   #8
codynw
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Exp:
Default

Terrible. I have no other words.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by CroFlames View Post
Before you call me a pessimist or a downer, the Flames made me this way. Blame them.
codynw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2015, 11:27 AM   #9
polak
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Weitz View Post
Ugh. The watering down of the NHL continues.
You wanted to increase scoring, there you go.
polak is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to polak For This Useful Post:
Old 06-24-2015, 11:31 AM   #10
Weitz
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by polak View Post
You wanted to increase scoring, there you go.
I never said that did I? Or you just using that as an example?
Weitz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2015, 11:32 AM   #11
handgroen
First Line Centre
 
handgroen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Exp:
Default

why does this surprise anyone. 32 teams is the holy number for bracket playoff leagues.
1 in every 2 teams makes the playoffs, 1 in every 4 makes the second round 1 in every 8 makes the third and 1 in every 16 makes the final. it's perfectly balanced. No reason to think the NHL wouldn't pursue this.
__________________


is your cat doing singing?
handgroen is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to handgroen For This Useful Post:
Old 06-24-2015, 11:32 AM   #12
guzzy
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Exp:
Default

I disagree with the watering down comments. There are more people playing worldwide. There is more talent than there ever has been. 80's hockey was brutal to watch compared to the skill of today. Messier would skate over the blue line and score with a wrist shot from the top of the circle everytime. That goal doesn't happen anymore because the players are better.
Yes, systems, goalie equipment etc have caused a downturn of scoring but it isn't due to lack of talent.
With the recent rise of US hockey and the annual increase of Draft picks coming from US, the game is getting bigger and skill is better.
guzzy is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 18 Users Say Thank You to guzzy For This Useful Post:
Old 06-24-2015, 11:34 AM   #13
CroFlames
Franchise Player
 
CroFlames's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by getbak View Post
Vegas is probably a shoe-in unless they screw something up badly.

Seattle, Portland, Milwaukee, Houston, Kansas City... Any or all of them could bid. If they bid, any of them could be successful. All of them have at least one question mark, mostly about the existence of willing local ownership.

Then, of course, there is the possibility of Toronto2, Hamilton, or Quebec City.
Seattle is still missing a rink unfortunately.

I think something none of us saw coming will happen, and some big shot from Toronto will put up a bid the BOG can't refuse, and another club will need to move back to the west. Probably the BJs.
CroFlames is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2015, 11:34 AM   #14
Reggie Dunlop
All I can get
 
Reggie Dunlop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Vegas gets one.

Southern Ontario will get the second.

Sorry Quebec City, no NHL for you!
Reggie Dunlop is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Reggie Dunlop For This Useful Post:
Old 06-24-2015, 11:35 AM   #15
polak
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Weitz View Post
I never said that did I? Or you just using that as an example?
I meant the overall "you". Not singling you out.
polak is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to polak For This Useful Post:
Old 06-24-2015, 11:35 AM   #16
codynw
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by handgroen View Post
why does this surprise anyone. 32 teams is the holy number for bracket playoff leagues.
1 in every 2 teams makes the playoffs, 1 in every 4 makes the second round 1 in every 8 makes the third and 1 in every 16 makes the final. it's perfectly balanced. No reason to think the NHL wouldn't pursue this.
On paper it's an okay idea. My issue is that they're expanding while there are multiple teams failing to make money with ownership that isn't willing to spend money to be competitive.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by CroFlames View Post
Before you call me a pessimist or a downer, the Flames made me this way. Blame them.
codynw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2015, 11:35 AM   #17
CroFlames
Franchise Player
 
CroFlames's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Reggie Dunlop View Post
Vegas gets one.

Southern Ontario will get the second.

Sorry Quebec City, no NHL for you!
I think Panthers move to QC. Tampa stays.
CroFlames is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2015, 11:39 AM   #18
getbak
Franchise Player
 
getbak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CroFlames View Post
Seattle is still missing a rink unfortunately.
Obviously, the lack of a suitable rink is one of the question marks around a Seattle team.

Keep in mind that Minnesota and Columbus didn't have rinks when they were awarded expansion teams. Their arenas both broke ground a year after the teams were announced.
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
getbak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2015, 11:40 AM   #19
codynw
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by getbak View Post
Obviously, the lack of a suitable rink is one of the question marks around a Seattle team.

Keep in mind that Minnesota and Columbus didn't have rinks when they were awarded expansion teams. Their arenas both broke ground a year after the teams were announced.
If they get a team, would Seattle just play in the Thunderbirds' arena until they get a new one?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by CroFlames View Post
Before you call me a pessimist or a downer, the Flames made me this way. Blame them.
codynw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2015, 11:45 AM   #20
GreenLantern
One of the Nine
 
GreenLantern's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Space Sector 2814
Exp:
Default

The Saskatchewan Smooth Riders!!!!
__________________
"In brightest day, in blackest night / No evil shall escape my sight / Let those who worship evil's might / Beware my power, Green Lantern's light!"
GreenLantern is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to GreenLantern For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:09 PM.

Calgary Flames
2023-24




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021