Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-26-2015, 04:49 PM   #61
NuclearFart
First Line Centre
 
NuclearFart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Matata View Post
Math attack:

Combustion efficiency, EV = (Coal Plant combustion efficiency)*(Line losses)*(engine efficiency)
Combustion efficiency, EV = (95%)*(50%)*(95%) = 45%

I figure 95% efficiency for the coal plant and car engine is close enough for estimates.

Combustion efficiency, typical car = 85% (again, just a reasonable guess)

Factor in that coal burns dirtier than gasoline and the Tesla comes out as a pretty nasty piece of work for emissions. The key difference being that you have several steps between combustion and the application of useful energy, whereas it is a one step process in a combustion engine. There are a ton of factors I haven't considered in my calculations (cost of transporting fuel might shake things up a bit), but I can't envision the Tesla's being a low emission vehicle in Alberta.
I think you are waaay off here. Combustion engines arent even close to halfway efficient. There is alot of energy lost as heat during the combustion itself, completely wasted energy on the piston upstroke, and then you lose alot of energy from the friction of all the moving parts.

Unless you meant the human body which operates around 90-95% efficiency.
NuclearFart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2015, 04:52 PM   #62
zamler
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Matata View Post
Combustion efficiency, typical car = 85% (again, just a reasonable guess)
I'm curious where you got this number from? Or why you considered it a reasonable guess, honest question. The absolute best gas burner on the road has a thermal efficiency of 40% (the Prius) which is amazing actually. But it needs a battery pack and electric motors to do it.

Well to wheel efficiency is actually surprisingly complex, depending on the source you will get different numbers but I'd say the general consensus is an electric is at least 70% efficient a petrol car less than 20%. Remember that a fuel burner has zero chance ever becoming green, it will always pollute. An electric has options. From what I've read you can extract enough energy to drive a Tesla about 10,000 miles/year with a moderate solar panel setup, I don't know about cost however but buying a Tesla right now certainly isn't about saving money.
zamler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2015, 04:57 PM   #63
polak
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Exp:
Default

Are you guys including power lost through the rest of the powertrain too?

That's another 10-20% depending on the drivetrain.
polak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2015, 05:13 PM   #64
zamler
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Exp:
Default

It's calculated by how much energy it takes to move the vehicle a certain distance. It's pretty easy to see that the 4-5x efficiency of the electric is true, it costs $7-10 to fully charge a Tesla and you can drive 270 miles. In most vehicles that would cost you $50. Not a perfect comparison by any stretch because we are going only on energy cost but it tracks fairly closely.
zamler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2015, 03:33 PM   #65
Matata
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Exp:
Default

As it has been brought to my attention that my numbers were lazy garbage (sorry folks, I reeeeeeally didn't want to do any research, but now I've embarrassed myself). Updates:

I said 'Line losses' when I should have said 'Distribution losses', still 50% (line losses range from 5-20%)
20% combustion efficiency for a car is a much better estimate.
70% engine efficiency for an EV car is a much better estimate (I can't get a good handle on this number, but it looks like it's around 50-70%)
33% is a better guess for coal plant efficiency.

Combustion efficiency, EV = (Coal Plant combustion efficiency)*(Distribution losses)*(engine efficiency)
Combustion efficiency, EV = (33%)*(50%)*(70%) = 11.55%

Which is still well below the combustion engine (same 2:1 ratio as my original calcs, my half-assing skills are next level).

Quote:
Originally Posted by zamler View Post
It's calculated by how much energy it takes to move the vehicle a certain distance. It's pretty easy to see that the 4-5x efficiency of the electric is true, it costs $7-10 to fully charge a Tesla and you can drive 270 miles. In most vehicles that would cost you $50. Not a perfect comparison by any stretch because we are going only on energy cost but it tracks fairly closely.
Earlier, I worked out the cost of fuel being nearly equivalent, but if we are then comparing the car engine at 20% and the Tesla engine at 50-70%, then the Tesla does come out as significantly more cost effective despite being much worse for emissions.
Matata is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2015, 09:26 AM   #66
GGG
Franchise Player
 
GGG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Exp:
Default

It appears your are ignoring extraction and transportation emissions from your analysis which is significant.
GGG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2015, 02:14 AM   #67
combustiblefuel
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Nanaimo
Exp:
Default

Owning a I.c.e powered vechile just seems like such a money pit to me now. My Emoto and ebikes only use $ 20 dollars (Emoto) and $5 (Ebikes combined) a month to "Refuel". My hub motors are 80% to 85% efficent and the mid drive motor I use on my emoto is 89 to 92% efficient. It typically costs me 76 cents to recharge a 8.7 kw batterypack for 3 hours.

I'm just in the beginning stages of converting my 1981 300d into an electric retrofit. Hopefully thatwill be done mid summer 2016.

Last edited by combustiblefuel; 11-29-2015 at 02:24 AM.
combustiblefuel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2015, 07:01 AM   #68
ernie
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Exp:
Default

A couple years old.

http://www.greencarreports.com/news/...re-than-an-suv

As more grids add more and more cleaner power the I expect the comparison will get more and more favorable for electric calls.

Last edited by ernie; 11-29-2015 at 07:03 AM.
ernie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2015, 08:44 AM   #69
Sliver
evil of fart
 
Sliver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by combustiblefuel View Post
Owning a I.c.e powered vechile just seems like such a money pit to me now. My Emoto and ebikes only use $ 20 dollars (Emoto) and $5 (Ebikes combined) a month to "Refuel". My hub motors are 80% to 85% efficent and the mid drive motor I use on my emoto is 89 to 92% efficient. It typically costs me 76 cents to recharge a 8.7 kw batterypack for 3 hours.

I'm just in the beginning stages of converting my 1981 300d into an electric retrofit. Hopefully thatwill be done mid summer 2016.
What are you rockin for an ebike? I've been looking at them and it seems you're spending $2k if you want something decent. Are there any deals to be had anywhere? I'd want a fast one...
Sliver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2015, 08:48 AM   #70
ernie
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Exp:
Default

Saw several Tesla's when i was in Stockholm for a week in September. Gorgeous cars. Just can't afford them.
ernie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2015, 10:01 AM   #71
Weitz
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Exp:
Default

My buddy was telling me that they list the prices of the cars there in USD to make them appear cheaper. Craziness.
Weitz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2015, 12:07 PM   #72
Ozy_Flame

Posted the 6 millionth post!
 
Ozy_Flame's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Exp:
Default

One thing that really made me mad with the Tesla store in Toronto (Yorkdale Mall) was their "list" price was after the fuel savings you'll have using a Tesla. The actual list price of the car was listed in the small print below. Really GMG.
Ozy_Flame is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2015, 02:49 AM   #73
combustiblefuel
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Nanaimo
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sliver View Post
What are you rockin for an ebike? I've been looking at them and it seems you're spending $2k if you want something decent. Are there any deals to be had anywhere? I'd want a fast one...
2 custom made one off choppers I built and a old school Dyno beach cruiser. 2k is the baseline just for decent electronics. 800 -1000 (50v to 72v) 400 to 600 (36v -48v) for a battery pack 100-250 for controller and 300-800 for a good (not a clone) motor. I will never need to replacethe motor. The controller is unlikely to go bad and typically ( If you know how to properly take care of a battery pack 4-7 years.


If your going to go with a $2000 dollar complete ebike prepare for trouble. Batteries are usually made from cheap b and c grade pouch cells. They either have problems with the bms, multiple cells lagging or cells that puff out. Motors are cheap clones and controllers burning out. Even if they use grade a 18650 cells the ahr rating is not what they tell you it is.

There are many great part companys who made a name for them selves thru endless-sphere.com
These are the only 3 I would ever trust for batteries .
Em3ev.com( hands down THE BEST WORLDWIDE)
Ebikes.ca
Lunacycles.com

Always make sure you check out ebike restrictions tho. Like in Alberta they require a motorcycle helmet. Here in B.C they don't.

Last edited by combustiblefuel; 12-01-2015 at 02:56 AM.
combustiblefuel is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to combustiblefuel For This Useful Post:
Old 12-01-2015, 02:59 AM   #74
combustiblefuel
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Nanaimo
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ernie View Post
Saw several Tesla's when i was in Stockholm for a week in September. Gorgeous cars. Just can't afford them.
There are 4 guys here in Victoria that have them. They are so gorgeous. There the only car I don't mind sitting behind on me Evs because I don't have to smell ####ing burning fumes.
combustiblefuel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2015, 06:39 AM   #75
Northendzone
Franchise Player
 
Northendzone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Exp:
Default

i wonder how long it is until tesla moves into the building that the lamborghini dealership currently occupies as i am assuming it has likely been a while since they sold anything at the lambo store
__________________
If I do not come back avenge my death
Northendzone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2015, 08:50 AM   #76
Ozy_Flame

Posted the 6 millionth post!
 
Ozy_Flame's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Northendzone View Post
i wonder how long it is until tesla moves into the building that the lamborghini dealership currently occupies as i am assuming it has likely been a while since they sold anything at the lambo store
Talked to the owner of that place at the end of September. He had sold 21 since the opening in May. Either he's lying through his teeth or people refuse to believe we're in a recession.

Also remember that his location serves Edmonton and all of Alberta (and likely Saskatchewan) as well.
Ozy_Flame is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2015, 10:32 AM   #77
polak
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Exp:
Default

People who can afford a Lambo probably don't give a #### about this recession. The only people who aren't buying them anymore are the ones who probably shouldn't have in the first place.
polak is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to polak For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:21 AM.

Calgary Flames
2023-24




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021