Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: Best prospect from the following list?
Bruce 0 0%
Carroll 2 0.77%
Culkin 7 2.70%
Dube 30 11.58%
Falkovsky 0 0%
Fox 75 28.96%
Hamilton 1 0.39%
Harrison 0 0%
Hathaway 27 10.42%
Kanzig 1 0.39%
Karnaukhov 0 0%
Lindstrom 0 0%
Mattson 0 0%
Morrison 2 0.77%
Ollas Mattsson 10 3.86%
Phillips 2 0.77%
Pollock 53 20.46%
Rafikov 0 0%
Rittich 0 0%
Schneider 0 0%
Smith 3 1.16%
Tuulola 46 17.76%
Voters: 259. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-26-2016, 10:47 AM   #21
TheIronMaiden
Franchise Player
 
TheIronMaiden's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: ATCO Field, Section 201
Exp:
Default

Maybe this is derailing but this might be an interesting time to consider this. Of the five upcoming RFA’s participating in this poll:

Morrison, Kenney
Rittich, David
Culkin, Ryan
Kulak, Brett
Hathaway, Garnet

Only 1 has cracked the top 15.


Of the RFA’s let go this year Only Bill Arnold cracked the top 15

http://forum.calgarypuck.com/showthr...hlight=Ranking

Will our upcoming RFA’s suffer a similar fate or has our prospect pool gotten deeper?


http://stats.nhlnumbers.com/teams/CGY?year=2017
TheIronMaiden is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2016, 10:53 AM   #22
transplant99
Fearmongerer
 
transplant99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Wondering when # became hashtag and not a number sign.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root View Post
I consider both. And also likelihood of making it.

A small, 18 year old 2nd round pick has more upside than Hathaway, but Hathaway is already an NHLer, and he is a very good 4th liner.

Conversely, the 2nd rounder has a 10-20% chance of being an NHLer.

Sure, if he makes it, a top 6er is far more valuable. But I factor down that value by the probability of making it.

Kylington: has shown progress, and sublime skating skills. So his stock is very high.

Fox is a 5'10" 18 year old. I look at his value as a top 6er x 10% (likelihood). He has to show me some progression before he's worth more than Hathaway in my mind.
He is?

he has a total of 14 games on his resume...how do you come to the conclusion that is very good?

Dont get me wrong as i like what i saw at the end of the year but that was garbage time for the whole team and there was little to no pressure on any of them to draw conclusions from.

I would say that with a new coaching staff and lots of competition for lower line spots being acquired, he is at best a 50/50 guy to stick all season.

Not meaning to derail things here but it seems like there a few guys that we all need to see a lot more of before anointing them anything but fringe NHL'ers.
__________________
transplant99 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to transplant99 For This Useful Post:
Old 07-26-2016, 10:54 AM   #23
VaporTrail
Draft Pick
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Default

So finally - Fox at #16. Shame if you ask me.
VaporTrail is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2016, 11:04 AM   #24
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by transplant99 View Post
He is?

he has a total of 14 games on his resume...how do you come to the conclusion that is very good?

Dont get me wrong as i like what i saw at the end of the year but that was garbage time for the whole team and there was little to no pressure on any of them to draw conclusions from.

I would say that with a new coaching staff and lots of competition for lower line spots being acquired, he is at best a 50/50 guy to stick all season.

Not meaning to derail things here but it seems like there a few guys that we all need to see a lot more of before anointing them anything but fringe NHL'ers.
I think he is (my opinion).

I liked what I saw in Stockton, and I liked what I saw of him on the Flames. He brings much more to the 4th line than Jooris, for example.

A lot of people would say that he was better than Bouma last year, who is a clear NHLer. I personally think that Bouma just had an off year, but the point remains.
Enoch Root is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2016, 11:08 AM   #25
JoelOtto29
Backup Goalie
 
JoelOtto29's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Detroit
Exp:
Default

I voted Pollock. He’s big and plays a power game. Upward progression each year. Interested to see how he does in Stockton.
JoelOtto29 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2016, 11:12 AM   #26
GranteedEV
Franchise Player
 
GranteedEV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

I agree that Hathaway is an NHLer. Whether he can beat NHL goalies with that NERF wrister remains to be seen but his overall game is NHL level. The skating, the defensive positioning, the forechecking, the strength on the puck, he is not only a good fourth liner but almost an ideal one.

However I still have Ollas-Mattsson, Dube, and Fox ahead of him. In fairness, I think that speaks more to the quality of our prospect depth than any knock on Hathaway. I just think the upside on these three is too high.

The next tier for me is Hathaway and Phillips. The guy with the high chance and the minimal upside and the guy with the extremely low chance and the maximum upside.

Last edited by GranteedEV; 07-26-2016 at 11:28 AM.
GranteedEV is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to GranteedEV For This Useful Post:
Old 07-26-2016, 11:16 AM   #27
Gaskal
Franchise Player
 
Gaskal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Exp:
Default

Hathaway should be a solid NHL 4th liner - however, I think what you see is what you're gonna get with him, and that's why I ranked him much lower than the others.
__________________
Until the Flames make the Western Finals again, this signature shall remain frozen.
Gaskal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2016, 11:23 AM   #28
doctajones428
First Line Centre
 
doctajones428's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Fort St. John, BC
Exp:
Default

Pollock for the (1) time in a row
doctajones428 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2016, 11:26 AM   #29
Point Blank
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Point Blank's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Exp:
Default

The results so far show why the loser of runoffs don't win the next round immediately.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hockey Fan #751 View Post
The Oilers won't finish 14th in the West forever.

Eventually a couple of expansion teams will be added which will nestle the Oilers into 16th.
Point Blank is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Point Blank For This Useful Post:
Old 07-26-2016, 11:35 AM   #30
Textcritic
Acerbic Cyberbully
 
Textcritic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: back in Chilliwack
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Point Blank View Post
The results so far show why the loser of runoffs don't win the next round immediately.

Not at this point. The last couple of run offs have featured players who each received less than 1/4 of the total votes cast. It shouldn't be a surprise that well more than half of posters have other players on their own lists.
__________________
Dealing with Everything from Dead Sea Scrolls to Red C Trolls

Quote:
Originally Posted by woob
"...harem warfare? like all your wives dressup and go paintballing?"
"The Lying Pen of Scribes" Ancient Manuscript Forgeries Project
Textcritic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2016, 12:03 PM   #31
Parallex
I believe in the Jays.
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IgiTang View Post
Will likely be on the big club come the season opener and it his spot to lose at this point.
Will he? I dunno... I think he's got maybe a 50% to make the team out of camp.
Parallex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2016, 12:08 PM   #32
MikeMc
Scoring Winger
 
MikeMc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Voted Carroll, I just really like his game and have hopes for him (no real other reason). Also Hathaway should either be off the list as an NHLer or way higher on this list. I'm saying he's an NHLer (and please replace Bollig).

Shiney new toys get alot of love as usual.
MikeMc is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to MikeMc For This Useful Post:
Old 07-26-2016, 02:03 PM   #33
IgiTang
Self-Retired
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Parallex View Post
Will he? I dunno... I think he's got maybe a 50% to make the team out of camp.
3 posters (EV, Enoch and myself) believe he is an NHL'er with a spot to lose at this point.

I'm not saying he remains, as someone younger and better could take his spot. But as of now, his most recent action was in the NHL and was consistently in the lineup to finish off the season.

Nothing is a sure bet, but I feel it is his spot to lose. For this reason, I am very confused how a player in the NHL is still considered a prospect if he's made the jump full-time.

I get that he could as easily be playing in the A this season, but that would be because someone took his spot or he stopped doing what got him there. Neither would, in my opinion, indicate he's back to being a "prospect".

My whole point is, I don't think he belongs on that list is all.. I'm just making conversation over a really boring off season.

Last edited by IgiTang; 07-26-2016 at 02:05 PM.
IgiTang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2016, 02:09 PM   #34
MrMastodonFarm
Lifetime Suspension
 
MrMastodonFarm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Hathaway's grouped in with a plethora of wingers looking for a spot this fall. He definitely doesn't have a spot to lose.
MrMastodonFarm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2016, 03:53 PM   #35
Vulcan
Franchise Player
 
Vulcan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Sunshine Coast
Exp:
Default

I see two spots open with Tkachuk, Shinkaruk, Vey, Hathaway as favourites and maybe a couple of vets are also vulnerable. I'd guess Tkachuk and Shinkaruk need to win regular positions while the others could take on the 13th and 14 spots.
Vulcan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2016, 04:08 PM   #36
Calgary4LIfe
Franchise Player
 
Calgary4LIfe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Exp:
Default

I think Hathaway is a favorite to push a vet off the 4th line. I don't think he is penciled-into the lineup just yet. I do think he plays a lot this year, but he is still very much a bubble player. I really like him and feel he will become a good 4th liner for the next few seasons at least on the Flames, but there are other guys who I still think have a pretty chance of cracking the lineup and being more valuable pieces.

People just vote how they feel is right. I personally can't vote a prospect (even with a good look at the NHL the prior season) who has 4th line upside and say he is definitively better than a prospect who has less of a chance to make the show, but has top 6 or top 4 potential.

I wouldn't trade a Fox (who just broke a points record for defencemen), or any of the goalies who all have shown varying degrees of promise, or even a guy like Tuulola who could very well become a better scoring Hathaway capable of playing 3rd line.

I can understand how some like to rank according to the percentages of a prospect making it, and one bird in the hand is worth two in the bush, but I don't personally subscribe to that notion. I do factor in how likely a prospect is to play in the NHL given what I have seen and know about a prospect, but it means little difference to me if a player is ready this year vs 2 years from now. I am ranking based on who I think will be the most valuable players for the Flames long-term, and though I really love guys like Hathaway (I really do!), I can't say with a straight face that they are not easily replaceable.

Now, if Hathaway had some softer mitts, he would shoot up my rankings so fast, but I just think he is rather easily replaceable. Glad he is in the organization, but wouldn't lose sleep if he wasn't re-signed.

Guys like Ollas-Mattsson, Dube, Fox, Lindstrom, and a few others are all ahead of him for me, as I think that even though they may be slightly longer shots to make the NHL, they will have a much greater impact on helping the Flames win if they do.
Calgary4LIfe is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Calgary4LIfe For This Useful Post:
Old 07-26-2016, 04:48 PM   #37
Bingo
Owner
 
Bingo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Calgary4LIfe View Post
I can understand how some like to rank according to the percentages of a prospect making it, and one bird in the hand is worth two in the bush, but I don't personally subscribe to that notion. I do factor in how likely a prospect is to play in the NHL given what I have seen and know about a prospect, but it means little difference to me if a player is ready this year vs 2 years from now. I am ranking based on who I think will be the most valuable players for the Flames long-term, and though I really love guys like Hathaway (I really do!), I can't say with a straight face that they are not easily replaceable.
That's how I see it too.

Each NHL club sheds 1/4 of their roster most summers, bottom half players are moving around all the time. You just don't need them to work out as prospects as much as starting goaltenders, top forwards or top 4 D
Bingo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2016, 11:13 PM   #38
Conroy4Mayor
Backup Goalie
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: PL13
Exp:
Default

Am I the only one bothered by the fact that fans have chosen three goalies in the Flames top 15 prospects? That suggests to me that the scouts need to do a better job finding decent skaters.

Has been Fox for me since round 10.
Conroy4Mayor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2016, 11:46 PM   #39
Textcritic
Acerbic Cyberbully
 
Textcritic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: back in Chilliwack
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Conroy4Mayor View Post
Am I the only one bothered by the fact that fans have chosen three goalies in the Flames top 15 prospects? That suggests to me that the scouts need to do a better job finding decent skaters.



Has been Fox for me since round 10.

Some of this has to do with the fact that the Flames have three top prospects that each graduated in their first pro season in successive years, but I don't see how this should be any cause for concern. Beyond Gillies, it looks to me more like the fan base is split between Parsons and McDonald on which is the #2 goalie in the system. This is more a product of the selection process in these polls.
__________________
Dealing with Everything from Dead Sea Scrolls to Red C Trolls

Quote:
Originally Posted by woob
"...harem warfare? like all your wives dressup and go paintballing?"
"The Lying Pen of Scribes" Ancient Manuscript Forgeries Project
Textcritic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2016, 12:00 AM   #40
Calgary4LIfe
Franchise Player
 
Calgary4LIfe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Exp:
Default

Though Schneider doesn't have the pedigree of Parsons or Macdonald, I have been very impressed with him and think he is in that mix as well.
Calgary4LIfe is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:48 PM.

Calgary Flames
2023-24




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021