Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-10-2012, 07:09 AM   #21
Bigtime
Franchise Player
 
Bigtime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by T@T View Post
The Russian answer for the Boeing 737 is a failure as expected,why they feel the need to try and compete is crazy, it cost them 5 times the $$ to develope these junk aircraft then it would to just buy one of the others.
The Superjet is hardly a "pure" Russian aircraft:

Thales (avionics)
Liebherr (with Teploobmennik OJSC and PMZ Voskhod JSC) (Flight Control Systems)
Messier-Dowty (landing gear)
Intertechnique (Zodiac) (fuel system)
BE Aerospace (interior)
Curtiss-Wright Controls (fire protection system)
Honeywell (APU)
IPECO (crew seats)
Parker Hannifin (hydraulic system)
Hamilton Sundstrand (electrical system)
Meggitt Vibro-Meter (engine vibration sensor)
Saint-Gobain Sully (windows)
AeroCell (Nacelles and Thrust Reverser)
SAMCO (Passenger and Cargo doors)
Goodrich Corporation, Aircelle (engine nacelle)


All designed in consultation with Boeing too.

So based on the above your argument of this being a "junk" aircraft could apply to pretty much every production aircraft being made by the big 4 (Boeing, Airbus, Bombardier, Embraer).

Sadly this is looking more and more like controlled flight into terrain with a crew that was not familiar with the area and its dangers at all.

Quote from a pilot very familiar with the area:

Quote:
If they had reached FL150 as reported, they would have had to descend prior to reaching the 30NM mark. Sounds easy enough. BUT, late afternoon in that area is normally not good for flying. I've seen clouds "collapsing down the side of Mt. Salak and spread across and cover the whole pass towards Pangrango before (I turned back... being in an unpressurized prop twin w/ no WXR). Quite often in the mid afternoon, clouds would cover both mountains, and only reveal Pangrango, and Salak is totally covered... looking like a big cumulus over small area undercast... (I used the term, "Cumulus Granitus" a lot after seeing that).

If these guys were only armed with Jepp approach, STAR, and enroute charts, a simple "fly out along R206 to 30NM and turn back", would be fine in VMC, but deadly in IMC and bad localized weather. A simple urge to duck under over there is hard to overcome unless you know the terrain there. The crew was unfamiliar with the area. Last time someone crashed into Mt. Salak, it was an air force C-212 on the way back to Halim from the south coast after some remote sensing equipment testing. Been there, also did the same, test remote sensing equipment down the south coast, heading back, huge temptation to simply press, "Direct to" Halim airport on GPS or FMC.


My crew used to hate me for forcing them to plot a course through the pass on the GPS and Mission console display, added with the instructions "In IMC Do not proceed direct HLM unless west of R-200 HLM and within 20DME HLM. Strict adherence to planned course through the pass in IMC, maintain 6000 above until 20DME. If GPS u/s or unable to maintain 6000, revert to alternative IMC return plan" (which involved a long detour west to avoid terrain over 1hr30 extra on that prop). It wasn't until they went through the pass in IMC did they appreciate the instructions. On a bad day, the pass collects northerly winds like a compressor on the north side, then spews it up the middle and down the sides in an erratic manner. I went through it in IMC once on one of those bad days, I'd rather not go through that again ever. Looking back at it now, even 6000 was probably too low.

Last edited by Bigtime; 05-10-2012 at 07:12 AM.
Bigtime is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Bigtime For This Useful Post:
Old 05-10-2012, 08:39 AM   #22
jeffman
Powerplay Quarterback
 
jeffman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by T@T View Post
The Russian answer for the Boeing 737 is a failure as expected,why they feel the need to try and compete is crazy,it cost them 5 times the $$ to develope these junk aircraft then it would to just buy one of the others.
Its the russian E 190 not 737
jeffman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2012, 12:04 PM   #23
Hilch
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by burn_this_city View Post
3 people died including 2 small children.
Well that makes that video less cool.
__________________
2012.02.24 Hemsky signs a 2 year $10,000,000 contract:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Champion View Post
A lot of character Hemsky has shown. He could have easily got a long term UFA contract. He knows what's brewing up here and wants to be a part of it. It can be contagious.
Hilch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2012, 06:01 PM   #24
HPLovecraft
Took an arrow to the knee
 
HPLovecraft's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Toronto
Exp:
Default

http://www.cnn.com/2012/05/10/world/...html?hpt=hp_t2

They found the jet on the side of a volcano, in pieces. They're opening a criminal probe in case of safety violations.

Edit: Guess it's already been posted.
__________________
"An adherent of homeopathy has no brain. They have skull water with the memory of a brain."
HPLovecraft is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
aviation , aviation nerds , crazy ruskies


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:44 AM.

Calgary Flames
2023-24




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021