Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-28-2017, 07:52 PM   #81
calgaryblood
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Hmmmmmmm
Exp:
Default

This is great news. Engelland is a great guy to have in the room but more importantly on the ice. Such an underrated part of this team.
calgaryblood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2017, 07:53 PM   #82
icarus
Franchise Player
 
icarus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Singapore
Exp:
Default

God I love that Engelland photo. That has got to be one of the best Flames pics ever.

Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk
__________________
Shot down in Flames!
icarus is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to icarus For This Useful Post:
Old 03-28-2017, 07:55 PM   #83
SeanCharles
First Line Centre
 
SeanCharles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Exp:
Default

If we could sign him and Stone to reasonable contracts I would love to keep them. There is a limit however, he's 35 and a bottom pairing guy. I want him back but for less than what he makes now and on, at most, a 2 year deal.

Gio-Hamilton
Brodie-Stone
Kulak-Engelland
Kylington-Andersson

Bartkowski has been a warrior but Treliving even admitted he was primarily brought in for the expansion draft. I don't mind him out there as a number 6 but honestly I'd rather develop a young guy in the 6 spot.

Hickey, Healey and Ollas Mattsson could make a push to get some games in also.

I don't think Culkin, Morisson or Wotherspoon will be retained (maybe Wotherspoon but I'm not sure we should) and Bartkowski is replacement level.

We need to sign two vets to round out our top 7 defenders and Stone and Engelland are my top choices when taking everything into consideration.

Like Treliving said let some young guys compliment the top 5 group.
SeanCharles is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2017, 08:51 PM   #84
Roof-Daddy
Franchise Player
 
Roof-Daddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MrMastodonFarm View Post
Yeah, he's had an off year but he's bounced back in Calgary to re-establish himself in a top four role. 27 years old, UFA, top four blueliners.. he's not going to take a pay cut.
I dunno, there is a big difference between getting a 1 year deal at arbitration's door and getting a multi year deal.

My bet is he's re-signed for 3 or 4 years @ about a $3.5 million cap hit.

Especially if he wants to be in Calgary for family reasons, and even more especially with Treliving sitting at the other end of the negotiating table.
Roof-Daddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2017, 08:59 PM   #85
Vinny01
Franchise Player
 
Vinny01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

2 years at 2M per?

Engellend is solid but not sure I would want him for what the price would be. I see him as more of a 7 going forward.

I want the Flames to secure a number 4 (Stone, Alzner, trade) then look at getting a player or two from Stockton on the big club next year (Kulak and or Andersen). There is room for Engellend but he has to take a paycut. I could see him going to Vegas as he would be a valuable vet and lives there already
Vinny01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2017, 10:00 PM   #86
FlamesAddiction
Franchise Player
 
FlamesAddiction's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

He was a good signing. A little on the expensive side, but he has been good for us, so no complaints. I hope they bring him back, but for a lower cost per season.
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."
FlamesAddiction is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2017, 10:03 PM   #87
Yoho
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: North America
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roof-Daddy View Post
I dunno, there is a big difference between getting a 1 year deal at arbitration's door and getting a multi year deal.

My bet is he's re-signed for 3 or 4 years @ about a $3.5 million cap hit.

Especially if he wants to be in Calgary for family reasons, and even more especially with Treliving sitting at the other end of the negotiating table.
Please no!
Yoho is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Yoho For This Useful Post:
Old 03-28-2017, 10:05 PM   #88
Mass_nerder
Franchise Player
 
Mass_nerder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Barthelona
Exp:
Default

I love what Engelland brings, but unless he's under $1.75, we can't do it.
I'm sure it's already been said a few times, but paying too much for 4th liners and 3rd pairing guys is how you get into trouble.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by snipetype View Post
k im just not going to respond to your #### anymore because i have better things to do like #### my model girlfriend rather then try to convince people like you of commonly held hockey knowledge.
Mass_nerder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2017, 10:19 PM   #89
Bourque's Twin
First Line Centre
 
Bourque's Twin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Section 120
Exp:
Default

There are not many Engelland's around the NHL. How many bottom pairing guys can play top 4 minutes, be a force in front of the net, contribute lots of PK time, and fight any heavy weight in the league? Not many. Because he's such a good fighter he has a bit of a "goon, bottom pairing stigma." However, he's actually a pretty good skater with decent hands too. Remember that breakaway goal he scored this season? He's 6'2 214 lbs but can fight anyone. This shows his strength and stamina. A guy who's made it all the way from the ECHL has tons of determination. Even though he's 35 years old next week, I think he has some good years left.. I think he's earned a 3 x $3M contract and I would be happy if the Flames gave him that. He deserves that money way more than Brouwer does. I hope Vegas ends up with Brouwer so the Flames can sign Engelland.
Bourque's Twin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2017, 10:20 PM   #90
MrMastodonFarm
Lifetime Suspension
 
MrMastodonFarm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yoho View Post
Please no!
For Stone?
That'd be a sweetheart deal.
MrMastodonFarm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2017, 10:22 PM   #91
Textcritic
Acerbic Cyberbully
 
Textcritic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: back in Chilliwack
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yoho View Post
Please no!
$3.5 m is less money than Stone is making on his current deal, and it is an excellent price for a 27-year-old second pairing defenseman. If he signs that contract in Calgary then the city should erect a statue in Brad Treliving's honour.
__________________
Dealing with Everything from Dead Sea Scrolls to Red C Trolls

Quote:
Originally Posted by woob
"...harem warfare? like all your wives dressup and go paintballing?"
"The Lying Pen of Scribes" Ancient Manuscript Forgeries Project
Textcritic is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Textcritic For This Useful Post:
Old 03-28-2017, 10:23 PM   #92
Split98
Franchise Player
 
Split98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Ontario
Exp:
Default

If he's taking 2 years at $1.5M per I'm all in. He really should have been signed at $2-$2.5M in 2014, but we needed to hit the floor remember.

That being said... I'm not going to hit the roof at $2M either. I'd still happily take him back. He's a very solid guy who we're going to love in the post-season.

I know Stone is the priority, but I don't see this being one or the other. I'd bet Stone takes a 1-year at the same salary, and Engelland is taking less.
Split98 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2017, 10:24 PM   #93
Dion
Not a casual user
 
Dion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: A simple man leading a complicated life....
Exp:
Default

Can we afford to bring back both Engelland and Stone?
__________________
Dion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2017, 10:25 PM   #94
Split98
Franchise Player
 
Split98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Ontario
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Textcritic View Post
$3.5 m is less money than Stone is making on his current deal, and it is an excellent price for a 27-year-old second pairing defenseman. If he signs that contract in Calgary then the city should erect a statue in Brad Treliving's honour.
Oop, nvm. Confused with the cap on a traded player.
Split98 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2017, 10:27 PM   #95
Reggie Dunlop
All I can get
 
Reggie Dunlop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Stone will get market price and be worth every penny.
Reggie Dunlop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2017, 10:28 PM   #96
Textcritic
Acerbic Cyberbully
 
Textcritic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: back in Chilliwack
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Split98 View Post
I'm seeing Stone at $2,000,000 this year
The Coyotes are retaining $2.0 m of his one-year $4.0 m deal.
__________________
Dealing with Everything from Dead Sea Scrolls to Red C Trolls

Quote:
Originally Posted by woob
"...harem warfare? like all your wives dressup and go paintballing?"
"The Lying Pen of Scribes" Ancient Manuscript Forgeries Project
Textcritic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2017, 10:29 PM   #97
Yoho
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: North America
Exp:
Default

Sorry I read that money for Deryk...
Yoho is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2017, 10:32 PM   #98
Split98
Franchise Player
 
Split98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Ontario
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dion View Post
Can we afford to bring back both Engelland and Stone?
Depends on what happens in goal, but we are gaining $5,250,000 in Wideman. I'm at a total loss on what it'd take to retain Elliott, but I can't imagine he's going north of $7M (could he?!). So technically, we have $7,750,000 minus Elliotts new contract to play with there.

Between those two, I can't see Stone getting more than $4M he has now or Engelland getting a pay-raise. If anything, we're saving money on Engelland.

Besides Elliott, there's only Ferland to worry about really. Bennett isn't due for a huge raise, and neither is Lazar or Chiasson (if even returning).
Split98 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2017, 10:32 PM   #99
Split98
Franchise Player
 
Split98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Ontario
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Textcritic View Post
The Coyotes are retaining $2.0 m of his one-year $4.0 m deal.
That sunk in for me seconds too late...
Split98 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2017, 10:34 PM   #100
Roof-Daddy
Franchise Player
 
Roof-Daddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yoho View Post
Sorry I read that money for Deryk...
My bad. I should have been more clear in a thread about re-signing Engelland
Roof-Daddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:50 AM.

Calgary Flames
2023-24




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021